<![CDATA[Gawker: Writing]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: Writing]]> http://gawker.com/tag/writing http://gawker.com/tag/writing <![CDATA[ Somebody Please Pun-ch Kenneth Cole. Get It? ]]> Kenneth Cole is not just a middling designer and outspoken advocate for responsible journalism; he's also, for reasons we can't fathom (narcissism), his own advertising copywriter. A bad advertising copywriter. It's not every CEO of a massive fashion brand that's too cheap to hire someone to write his own billboard taglines. But in Kenneth Cole's case, coming up with them only robs him of mere seconds of thought. That's how his poor clothing line ends up with billboards like this one on Houston St.—presumably the balls are there to distract you from the slogan itself:

[via Copyranter]

]]>
Fri, 18 Jul 2008 13:47:30 EDT Hamilton Nolan http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5026737&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Court Victory for Dunne, Reckless Speculation Everywhere ]]> Fantastic news, America—our constitutional right to repeatedly call a man a murderer has been upheld! Former congressmen Gary Condit, who allegedly caused 9/11 (j/k Gary!) sued Vanity Fair scribe Dominick Dunne for defamation, because Dunne kept claiming he knew that Condit knew stuff he wasn't telling about the murder of former Condit intern/paramour Chandra Levy (which Condit is totally responsible for, allegedly). Dunne went on the tee-vee and said "I think he knows more about what did happen than he has ever said," so the judge dismissed the suit becuz "I think" means it was a constitutionally protected statement of opinion, not assertion of fact. Or, as the judge put it, "Dunne does not suggest that his opinion statements are based on any additional facts not known to the public." This is terrible news for everyone, as now we all actually do have to be careful to use those stupid weasel words. Like "allegedly"!

For years, bloggers and other assorted morons have assumed "allegedly" is some sort of magical "get out of libel free" card, when in fact it is just an annoying affection (except when we use it, then it's a funny joke). But if "I think" is now the magical line between defamation and simple innocent speculation, well, consider us hypothetically back on the accused bandwagon!

This is the second lawsuit Condit's lost against Dunne, and Dunne just keeps accusing the never-charged man of "knowing" things about this murder, repeatedly implying that the former congressmen is—as pretty much everyone in America suspects—personally responsible.

Now we can accuse the mildly famous of anything as long as we couch it in tentativeness. We thought we heard that maybe John Mayer supports Robert Mugabe? Oh, and Paul Janka, accused rapist, can't wait to meet all of you guys!

Dominick Dunne Clear of Insinuating Gary Condit is a Creepy Maybe-Murderer [Jossip]
Condit Suit Against Dunne Tossed [Radar]
Judge Dismisses Condit Lawsuit Against Author [ModBee]

]]>
Wed, 09 Jul 2008 11:39:28 EDT Pareene http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5023346&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ AP Stylebook No Longer "Mentally Retarded" ]]> apstylebook.jpegJourno-nerds rejoice: the AP Stylebook has been updated! It's the Bible of all that is considered acceptable in middle American newsrooms, and, like middle America itself, is consistently several years behind the times. So what changes can you look forward to in tomorrow's edition of the Mattoon Journal Gazette? More text messaging, less malarkey, and no more retarded people!


Other new entries include anti-spyware, high-definition, outsourcing, podcast, text messaging, social networking, snail mail and Wikipedia and such sports terms as minicamp and wild card.

Among the outdated words gone from the new spiral-bound Stylebook are barmaid, blue blood, malarkey, milquetoast, Photostat, riffraff and WAC, which is no longer used by the U.S. military but may describe a woman who served in what had been the Women's Army Corps.

Other changes in the A to Z update include the entry for "African-American," which previously indicated that the "preferred term is black." Now, the African-American entry states: "Acceptable for an American black person of African descent. Black is also acceptable. The terms are not necessarily interchangeable."

In another significant revision, "mentally retarded" is no longer the preferred term, replaced by "mentally disabled."

Is "wild card" really a new term? And I still say "riffraff" several times per week. Also missing: Nilla.

[AP]

]]>
Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:04:50 EDT Hamilton Nolan http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=397202&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Copy Editing Cliches ]]> copyedits.jpegA media company identifying itself as "Cond Nast Publications" is in need of a copy editor. Specifically, the ad says, "TheAssociate Copy Editorreviews copyedited text." Urgent, please apply now! Click through for a screengrab of thisjobopportunity.

condnastad.jpeg

]]>
Thu, 29 May 2008 15:03:43 EDT Hamilton Nolan http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=394071&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Method Writer Takes Steroids For Authenticity ]]> mucles.jpgCraig Davidson is a Canadian novelist. He got all bulked up on steroids because, well, the character for the novel he was writing took steroids, he explains in The Guardian. "My character goes down dark roads. For the sake of the book, I thought I'd travel those roads with him. He begins to work out obsessively. I began to work out obsessively... He takes steroids. I took steroids." Method writing at work! It turns out that gearing up, however, is not so simple. It made his life an utter, living hell. By the fourth day: "I appeared to have breasts. Pendulous, malformed breasts." Other bad things happened. To his testicles. To his... prostate.

I had a misconception that being 'on steroids' involved the ingestion or injection of a single substance, but that was quickly dispelled. Many steroids on their own are either singular of purpose or not terribly effective. This is where 'stacking' comes in: you can put on mass (75mg of testosterone), promote muscle hardness (50mg of Winstrol) and keep water retention to a minimum (50mg of Equipoise).
Then the real fun began!
Then, one sleepless night (the steroids also triggered insomnia) my testicles shrunk. Testicular atrophy is the most well-known side-effect of steroid abuse. It's an inherent irony: here you are trying to turn yourself into an über-man while part of the most obvious manifestation of your manhood dwindles before your eyes... Basically, you pump so much testosterone into your system that you rob your gonads of purpose, they lie dormant for the duration of your steroid cycle. And while I knew this would happen, the physical sensation was beyond horrible. I felt this rude clenching inside my scrotum, like a pair of tiny hands had grasped the spermatic cords and tightened into fists. It happened that fast - like a door slammed shut. 'No more testosterone!' my gonads cried. 'Closed for business!' I sat up, gasping, clutching my testicles to make sure they were still there.
He also got "cranial swelling," meaning a caveman-like size of his brow. His hair—all his hair—fell out. He peed constanttly. And then... the prostate:
The prostate is an organ I associate with old men... Not, in any way, an organ I should be aware of. And yet I was, because the benign little organ had swollen to the point where it felt like a fist-sized balloon pressed against my testicles. This is a fairly common side-effect; some professional bodybuilders get prostatitis to such an extent they require a catheter.
We can all learn from this! Some of us want to suffer for art. Or maybe we want an excuse to suffer, period—which Davidson admits as much: "I persisted in the belief that all suffering on my part was long overdue." Anyway, he's off the 'roids now. Totally.

From Mr. Average... to Superman [Guardian]


]]>
Mon, 19 May 2008 16:29:43 EDT Sheila http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=391801&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ How to Deal With Critics Without Looking Like an Idiot ]]> jay_sherman_critic_1994.jpgWriting is hard, lonely work. At least that's what all the great writers say, so that's the line to stick to at dinner parties. But when your Great American Novel is complete, there's loads of self-congratulations. And after that, praise from friends and family. But then strangers who went to better colleges than you, the critics, come in to eviscerate you in 600 words. How is a writer to a respond? Violence? Sex? Passive-aggressive letters?

One strategy is to lie. Jhumpa Lahiri, whose new book was rightfully lauded twice in the Times, pretends she doesn't read the reviews. In an interview with The Atlantic, she said hasn't read anything about The Unaccustomed Earth:


I feel like I should be more hardened at this point, but in a way I feel more vulnerable. With this book I decided not to look at anything at all. Perhaps in the future I'll ask my editor or someone to show me a few that she thinks could really benefit me somehow.
I'm not going to call J.L. a Jiant Liar, but I will say that it seems unlikely that she's completely unaware of all the praise the book has gotten.

Another tactic is bitterness. Romance writer DeborahAnne MacGillivray harassed an Amazon reader for giving her book three stars.

I am think (sic) you skimmed the book, sitting in an auto place, worry about big bad men sniggering, and didn't bother to see why the characters did things, just took surface reactions. You are keying into Aithinne's POV, which at many times is not accurate to what was really happening.
As much as we love a literary fistfight, responding to Amazon critics should be beneath even a romance novelist.

The most mature (or studiedly immature?) policy is the Keith Gessen method: fuck the haters. Don't write it in the letters page of the paper that dissed you, because as the Columbia Journalism Review points out, you'll only end up looking like an asshole:

But what is good for the letters page isn't necessarily good for a letter's writer. Not only does a complaint resurrect the negative review and present it sensationally to anyone who missed it the first time, but it can reek of sour grapes and suggest the author of the book lacks confidence to let the work stand for itself. To watch these letters unfold is to watch a writer step boldly out to the dueling grounds, only to shoot himself in the foot.
A bitter letter written with great style is the exception. Of course, if you could write with great style, you wouldn't be in this position. See, writing is hard. All we can offer is the Ian Spiegelman method.

]]>
Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:14:26 EDT rebecca http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=381087&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Best Paragraph? More Like Third Quartile! ]]> Freaknomics author Stephen Dubner says this is "The Best Paragraph You'll Read All Week." Really, Stephen Dubner? Perhaps you could use some more varied reading materials. Am I missing the genius in this standard-issue "I used to be a geek" narrative? Click to enlarge the graf (an intro to a column in the FT), which the superstar economist says is amazing and I, who took six years to finish my bachelor's degree, say is rather pedestrian. [Freakonomics]

]]>
Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:21:08 EDT Hamilton Nolan http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=380149&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Neal Pollack: Just Not Much Of A Writer ]]> nealpollack2.jpegThe preponderance of outstanding evidence has finally and inexorably built up to the point that no reasonable person can avoid coming to the conclusion that "Alternadad" author Neal Pollack, who enjoys both chronicling and defending his decision to chronicle his young child, is just not much of a writer at all. Despite his background as a professional writer with the Chicago Reader, McSweeney's, Vanity Fair, GQ, and other respected outlets—as well as his ability to convince publishing houses to pay him money in order to write books—it is now impossible to deny the fact that Pollack is just not cut out for this whole writing thing. The scale-tipping work is his new Men's Journal profile of Woody Harrelson, in which the sheer lack of insight, or even cleverly redeeming turns of phrase, has us vowing never to read anything by this fucker again.

In this article—much like his recent diarrhea-soaked paean to Josh Brolin—Pollack manages to phone in thousands of words about spending quality time with a celebrity without even making an attempt to do anything except to confirm the most simplistic version of the conventional wisdom about said celebrity. It is also badly written. We find out, therefore, that Woody Harrelson is "a guy fully at ease with himself, but still unique, even deeply strange."

Woody's decision to "hang with the fam" was the "Best decision I ever made."

How does he like his home in Maui? "I'm sure glad I found it."

Woody greets a woman "as if he's known her his whole life."

A friend reveals that Woody is "an affable character."

The lone possibility of an intriguing passage emerges when Pollack touches on Woody's father, who was a contract killer who died in prison. Pollack kills it.

"He was asked to do some special things for the government. The wanted to know if he really wanted to serve his country," [says Harrelson].

"What are you referring to?"

"Let's leave a little ambiguity there."

This is obviously a source of deep discomfort for Woody, who is normally open to talking about anything.

So does Woody think his dad was a government assassin? We don't know. What Pollack does tell us is: Woody Harrelson is smart enough to know when he meets the cool folks. Here are the final two sentences of Pollack's story, and hopefully the last of his we will ever see:

When I get home there's a text message from Woody, my new best friend, waiting for me on my cell phone.

"Pleasure hangin' bro," it says.

]]>
Sun, 09 Mar 2008 11:00:29 EDT Hamilton Nolan http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=365611&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Moving To Brooklyn Won't Turn You Into Jonathan Safran Foer (Thank God) ]]> Brooklyn_Bridge_SnSt_3847.jpgNo matter what borough you live in, how much you pay in rent or who your neighbors are, being a writer still sucks. Nouns and verbs are hard to come up with. Even Brooklyn, with all its just-as-good-as-Manhattan verve, can't change that for you. If anything, as Colson Whitehead, author of the revered Apex Hides the Hurt, reports in the Sunday Book Review, it's harder. All the shrinks are still in Manhattan and reading friends' unpublished books is boring. And even a dip in the Gowanus Canal can't cure writers block. Of course, Brooklyn writers hating the Brooklyn writers' scene is a trend as old as metrosexuals.

Sara Gran, author of Dope and Brooklynite by birth, wrote a similar essay also for the New York Times two and a half years ago. As she put it: "There's a rumor going around that Brooklyn is some kind of heaven on earth for writers. ... I think they've been a little too optimistic."

Her essay pondered the reading material choices on the F train. Whitehouse makes an analogy between writing in Brooklyn and The Warriors.

But thank god the Times still needs to explain that whole "people live in other boroughs" thing to its target demo, 'cause outer borough hipsters gotta eat.

"I Write in Brooklyn. Get Over It." [NYT]
"Call It Booklyn" [NYT]

]]>
Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:19:22 EST rebecca http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=362635&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Great Movies About Writers ]]> chimp_at_typewriter2.jpgEntertainment Weekly ran a feature today showing 14 of their favorite films about writers, in honor of the WGA strike ending. It's a pretty good sampling we think, and have decided to go one step further and dredge up some clips. We were able to find 12 of the 14 films listed, so we've included two bonuses: a clip from Curtis Hanson's Wonder Boys, and a touching video of aspiring poet Vada Sultenfuss reciting a sad poem in the groundbreaking 1991 film My Girl. (We tried to find the ice cream poem, but alas were foiled.) What films did they miss?

A Face In the Crowd, 1957:

The Front, 1976

In A Lonely Place, 1950

Permanent Midnight, 1998

Barton Fink, 1991

The Dying Gaul, 2005

8 1/2, 1963

My Favorite Year, 1982

The TV Set, 2006

Adaptation, 2003

Sunset Boulevard, 1950

Leaving Las Vegas, 1995

Wonder Boys, 2000

My Girl, 1991

]]>
Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:30:19 EST Richard http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=356227&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ More Death, Less Cuddling on the New Meaner 'Animal Planet' ]]> One doesn't need to look far to see that we prefer seeing things fall apart, tear up, tear asunder and eventually decay leaving only a bleached carcass lying on the windswept beach of what was once a lush forrest of our malevolent interest. (woah! Wha?) I mean, we like watching pain! It took E!, OK! and Tolstoy! about two seconds to realize this but it took Animal Planet nearly 11 years.
The 11-year-old channel, owned by Discovery Communications, is one of the best-known brands on cable, but its ratings have stagnated for several years. On Feb. 3 the channel will start programming specifically for adults, scrapping its previous “something for everyone” style. “It made us unimportant to everyone,” said Marjorie Kaplan, who became general manager of Animal Planet last year.
So that's it, then? No more cuddly wolf-and-lamb PG-13 omniscient third-person narrations of peaceful wildlife tableaux? Nope! Shit's gonna eat shit and we're gonna watch!
[T]he new Animal Planet will emphasize predation programming (a friendlier term for animal death action), pet shows and immersive storytelling. “Escape to Chimp Eden” will feature chimpanzee rescues in Africa; “Groomer Has It” will test amateur and professional animal groomers; and “Whale Wars” will cover the controversial practice of Antarctic whaling.
Ooo, can't wait until the episode when Dr. Phil visits the bonobo with a Klonopin problem in a jungle hut in Kenya. RATINGS!!! After Ratings Slip, Animal Planet Turns To Its Wild Side [NYT] ]]>
Mon, 14 Jan 2008 05:10:44 EST Joshua Stein http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5002219&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Phil Knight Partying, Growing With Stanford Coeds ]]> knight.jpgThe one creepy old dude in your undergrad creative writing course? Maybe it's Nike founder Phil Knight, who's secretly been attending classes at Stanford, learning to bare his soul through fiction. Knight isn't enrolled at Stanford, but $105 million donations have a way of opening doors.

Interviews conducted by the Wall Street Journal with classmates suggest that Knight, like John McCain and a million other aging "successful" dudes, has an adolescent Hemingway crush. He's working on a novel that will probably be about a misunderstood, hard-charging corporate exec fighting for what he believes in against weak-willed naysayers and child-loving labor activists.

Also, he's on Facebook! "He appears in a photo posted there," according to the Wall Street Journal, his arms around two undergraduates, with a third student holding what appears to be a drained margarita." Someone want to send that in?

Ironically, Knight's financial gifts to the school are going to develop the "Knight Management Center" at Stanford's business school, where each year hundreds of fresh-faced future CEOs will be subject to the burning resentment and scorn of Knight's English student peers.

Stanford Mystery: Who's the Old Guy In the White Nikes? [WSJ]

]]>
Mon, 03 Dec 2007 15:50:48 EST Pareene http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=329270&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The 'El Quijote' Sandwich Is As Disappointing As A Terrible Foodblogger Book Deal ]]> sandwich.jpgPublishers Marketplace is reporting that Nosheteria.com blogger Adrienne Kane has sold her first book, to be titled 'Cooking and Screaming,' to Simon & Schuster imprint Simon Spotlight Entertainment. We'd never heard of this blog, but we like eating food, so we decided to check it out. Of a recently purchased handful of satsumas and persimmons, Adrienne writes, "Soon the fruit beckoned to me, and it told me it wanted to play with that lonely endive in the fridge. And play they did, quite beautifully, together on the chartreuse salad plate. I love a salad with fruit, not a fruit salad mind you (though they are stupendous as well), but a salad that has the mystical interplay between sweet and savory, and that is what this salad had." She's a regular Danyelle Freeman! As Josh and I ate lunch at our desks, we wondered: how hard could it be to write about food in the style of these ladies?

I pondered this as I took my first mouthful of Despaña's 'El Quijote' sandwich or "bocadillo." Its name, a reference to the hero of Miguel de Cervantes's famous novel 'Don Quijote de la Mancha,' seems to indicate that this sandwich might be inclined to tilt at windmills, eg, attempt to surmount seemingly impossible challenges. While the challenge of 'being delicious' is not actually insurmountable, this sandwich might make you think otherwise.

While it may be true, as Cervantes writes, that "A father may have a child who is ugly and lacking in all the graces, and the love he feels for him puts a blindfold over his eyes so that he does not see his defects but considers them signs of charm and intelligence and recounts them to his friends as if they were clever and witty," it's hard to imagine that even this sandwich's creator could love it. The bread is chewy, like a piece of chewing gum. This chewiness makes it tough to bite into: tough, like a tough piece of overcooked meat or a fruit leather or something else with a hard, chewy texture.

The sandwich's contents are delicious, though: salty cured pork loin and manchego cheese contrasting with sweet quince paste like light and dark, black and white, weak and strong, hot and cold, loose and tight, or peace and war. Like old and young, or men and women, or good and evil, basically. The two things played off each other well. The cheese and meat was the yin to the quince paste's yang, or possibly vice versa.

Still, overall, I thought this sandwich could've been better.

]]>
Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:30:15 EST Emily Gould http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=325005&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Foxy Brown Won't Leave Rikers! And Neither Will You. ]]> foxyIt is almost the weekend, praise be! And no matter what your weekend threatens to bring, remember that it's surely gonna be better than that of imprisoned BlackBerry-hurling former rap star Foxy Brown, who is so stewed that she won't even get on the bus from Rikers Island (New York's real sixth borough!) for her arraignment. She's had it up to here! So wherever you go, remember this lone woman's spirit of resistance. Yes. Whether you rot in your own personal jail of an apartment, or venture out in the big bad City to be judged by officers of the law and those that impersonate them, you are all Foxy Brown.

Foxy Brown won't get on bus for court [AP]

]]>
Fri, 12 Oct 2007 17:54:13 EDT Choire http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=310467&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Graffiti in the bathroom of the hotsy-totsy ... ]]> Graffiti in the bathroom of the hotsy-totsy gallerist Gavin Brown's soon-to-close bar Passerby: "I make a living scraping the coke off the floor at Passerby. Thanx Gavin!"

]]>
Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:40:39 EDT Joshua Stein http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=304465&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ We're adding "Ted Turner's publicist" to ... ]]> We're adding "Ted Turner's publicist" to the list of jobs we could not be paid enough to take. Says Ted to his minder during an interview: "I DON'T NEED YOU FOR THAT! YOU'RE JUST AN OLD PUSSY! YOU'RE JUST AN OLD PUSSY! YOU'RE JUST A LITTLE MOTHER HEN. [in falsetto] "WE'VE GOTTA DO THIS! WE'VE GOTTA DO THAT!" [back to regular voice] THIS IS IMPORTANT! THIS IS MORE IMPORTANT!" Wow, he kisses Robert Olen Butler's ex-wife with that mouth? [HuffPo]

]]>
Thu, 20 Sep 2007 09:20:28 EDT abalk http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=301802&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ A Night Out With Me, About Me, By Me ]]> A Drunk Finally Gets A Chance To Whine
NEW YORK

LAST night found Alex Balk, "blogger," drinking with his cock, My Cock, at Old Town, a classic tavern in the Union Square neighborhood here. Half the bar was shrouded in shadow, but Mr. Balk was illuminated by the red glow from the neon sign overhead. This seemed fitting, given that Mr. Balk had just turned red after reading a New York Times "A Night Out With" about writer Stacey Grenrock Woods, erroneously described, as the photos here show, by the paper's website as being written (in the third person) by Stacey Grenrock Woods.

The article's tone was both knowing and earnest, using standard self-deprecation in an attempt to deflect the charges of self-aggrandizement that the bizarre arrangement was sure to elicit.

"What the fuck," said Mr. Balk, an appallingly grizzled 34-year-old, as he knocked back shot after shot of Wild Turkey. "Are they fucking kidding with the shit? Is it supposed to be post-modern? Does she know someone there?"

Bitter disappointment on the agenda this evening: Mr. Balk hadn't eaten all day, and was making progressively less sense.

"I see you've got a little vomit on your shirt," said Mr. Cock, a shaggy phallus, noting his host's disheveled appearance.

"No chunks, at least," Mr. Balk said with a hiccup. He had emerged from the restroom with a familiar token of minor weekend inebriation: a large trail of toilet paper stuck to his shoe. He delicately—inasmuch as anyone with hands trembling the way his were—pulled it off and offered it to Mr. Cock.

"Here, Cock," Mr. Balk said. "Wipe yourself with it the next time you get excited." Mr. Cock recoiled as if the paper contained naked photos of Ann Coulter.

Over drinks, Mr. Cock reminded Mr. Balk of another literary annoying aspect of Grenrock Woods' self-penned PR piece: Her not-so-subtle suggestion that people might want to read the July issue of Playboy, which has some nude shots of her in it.

"Raza deal wizzat," Mr. Balk retorted. "Y'neverd see naked piczures a me." ("Who would want to?" asked Mr. Cock. The question hung in the air, until Mr. Balk's stomach materialized atop the bar.)

Afterward, the group was escorted to a street corner, where Mr. Balk found a few comrades sitting around a half pint of Georgi vodka. In an slow, deliberate attempt at sounding sober, Mr. Balk said: "Sip, please?"

A few rounds later Mr. Balk was beckoned home by another impending day at the blog office, and the emptiness of the bottle. His streetmates asked what kinds of hopeless posts he'd phone in the coming month. "Cause your whole fucking July was all Murdoch, Murdoch, Murdoch," one noted.

Mr. Balk slouched. "No fucking clue," he said. "Probably will make some crappy parody of the Stacey Grenrock Woods thing in the Times. And who knows? Maybe new job come soon." Puking copiously, he admitted, "More posts by My Cock."

"Blearrragh," he added.

Mr. Cock stood silently at attention, a single tear dripping down his cheek.

A Star Finally Gets to Shine [NYT]

[Update: No really! It's just that the website said she wrote it! The paper has the real author's byline and all, no need to crucify her. Jeez, MONDAYS.]

]]>
Mon, 06 Aug 2007 10:44:52 EDT abalk http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=286326&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ "Hot Chicks With Douchebags" Sells ]]> douchetwins.jpgIf a website with pictures of hot ladies and fug dudes in shiny shirts isn't enough to sate your appetite for that stuff, well, good news!
NON-FICTION: HUMOR
Jay Louis's HOT CHICKS WITH DOUCHEBAGS: Deconstructing the Unholy Wrongness of Hottie/Douchey Coupling and How to Recover from the Douchebag Plague, based on the website HotChickswithDouchebags.com, to Jeremie Ruby-Strauss at Simon Spotlight Entertainment, by Michael Harriot at Vigliano Associates (world).
Seriously, thank God. It's hard to appreciate insights like "I would love ambiguous Russian Minx hotties in a massive tsarist bacchanal complete with grapes, goblets and a fey lute player for bemusement while resting between bouts of coitus. Then I would feed the Doublemint Douche Twins to the lions while reading Tolstoy to the Noxema Girl Hottie and sipping from the Samovar" on the screen. The printed page is where they belong!

]]>
Tue, 22 May 2007 12:49:45 EDT Emily Gould http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=262520&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ West Coast Sweeps Journo Food Awards ]]> beard.jpgLast night the James Beard foundation recognized outstanding food journalists. (Tonight's the big night for chefs and restaurants.) These Pulitzers of the Palate, the Ellies of the Edible, the Man Bookers of the Pressure Cookers, were notable for at least one reason—what a surprise it was how few of the winners, especially among the newspaper category, hail from New York. In a largely West Coast sweep, the San Francisco Chronicle took home the best newspaper section, Rebekah Denn of the Seattle Post-Intelligencer won best review—and Los Angeles magazine's Jesse Katz took to his West Coast home the MFK Distinguished Writing Awards. This is clearly ridiculous and impossible, as the Other Coast has nothing to offer whatsoever in terms of culture. Do they even eat food out there without throwing it up?

James Beard Journalism Award Winners

]]>
Mon, 07 May 2007 12:39:13 EDT Joshua Stein http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=258241&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Career Advice From Psycho Peter Braunstein ]]> braunsteinFresh news from the trial of former WWD writer Peter Braunstein, who's up on charges of kidnapping and sexual assault. Yesterday, prosecutors argued that Braunstein's demeanor at the time of the attack indicated that he knew exactly what he was doing: Five days prior to the incident he rented a storage facility in which to keep his "souvenirs" of the assault, and hours after he left the victim's apartment he showed up at a part-time job to collect some money he was owed. Jose Ramirez, a rental agent at the storage unit, noted that he was "friendly" and "talkative." In fact, he was something of a counselor:
Mr. Ramirez said he asked Mr. Braunstein about getting a book published. Mr. Braunstein told him that nonfiction sold better than fiction, and that The Village Voice (where Mr. Braunstein got his start) was a good place to nurture his writing career, Mr. Ramirez said.
Well, not bad advice actually! Of course this was before the Tony Ortega editorship era; we understand they're a lot less forgiving over at the Voice now.

At Trial of Suspect in Sexual Attack, Lawyers Debate Meaning of 'Normal' [NYT]

]]>
Thu, 03 May 2007 12:27:04 EDT abalk2 http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=257426&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Yale Prof: Alec Baldwin Did Not Seduce "Audrey" ]]> alec%20baldwin.jpgLast night we heard from Yale Associate Professor of English Bill Deresiewicz (affectionately known in these parts as "Cockmaster D"), who was upset that we'd posted two assignments from his class on "Reportage" the other day. (Assignment: "Report on a person or event in such a way as to include your presence as a narrator.") His students wrote about Alec Baldwin's visit to the Yale campus, and Baldwin's flirtation with a girl who was named "Audrey."

While we feel that Prof. Deresiewicz should have been more concerned with the quality of his students' writing, he was upset that we'd inadvertently caused grief for all girls on the Yale campus named Audrey, or at least one. Turns out his student had changed the girl's name and it wasn't "Audrey" at all! Since he apparently thinks in loco parentis somehow extends to adult students, he wrote to us:

I'm the teacher of the class for which the pieces you posted were written. Now I understand that a woman named Audrey in the class is being hounded by media people and others asking for her story. In fact, the writer of the piece changed the name of the woman in question; it isn't Audrey at all. In the interests of sparing this innocent young woman further trouble, could you please post a note to that effect on your site?
We spoke to Audrey, too, and she confirmed that she wasn't the one upon whom Alec Baldwin laid his lascivious eyes. Unsurprisingly, the real student, not an "Audrey," would like to remain anonymous and declined an invitation to comment.

Earlier: Alec Baldwin's Trip to Yale
Earlier: Reading About Reading: Cockmaster D Revealed

]]>
Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:38:09 EDT Doree Shafrir http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=255837&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Alec Baldwin's Trip To Yale ]]> alec%20baldwin.jpgAlec Baldwin doesn't spend all his time on the phone in New York City, it turns out. Last week, he visited Yale to give a "master's tea" but also took some time to get acquainted with his surroundings. Fortunately, two of the university's creative writing students encountered Mr. Baldwin while he was there—and they recorded their impressions.

From the first student:

As everyone knows, you never forget meeting celebrities. Encounters with the famous leave glowing fingerprints on our lives, as if we have been touched by something fiery and celestial. That's why I'll always cherish my encounter with Alec Baldwin:

Alec: Pardon me, I need to make a phone call.
Me: [Stepping out of his way] Sorry, sorry.

That day, Alec gave a talk at Yale in a lecture hall which seated 175. A hundred more people were turned away when a wrathful fire marshal arrived to crack down on those hoping to loiter in the aisles or stand in the back. One woman, claiming to be "a grad student at the med school here" and to have "a reserved seat," punched the student guarding the door, bolted past him to the lecture hall, and then, when the police came to detain her, escaped down the street. Understandable: physical assault and possible arrest are token prices to pay for a glimpse of Alec Baldwin.

The post-talk dinner with Alec was an even hotter ticket: students lobbied for days in advance to earn a seat at the table. One girl, having won her place, arrived for dinner wearing a curvy summer dress and a full complement of makeup. She immediately set her purse down in a chair at the center of the long table, across from where she anticipated Alec would be, to mark the territory. (I would be hanging in the corner, balancing my plate on my lap.) Ten minutes before eight, Alec rose from dinner with an extravagant thank-you and left to see a play, accompanied by his friend David Blank and by the girl in the summer dress. The rest of us kicked ourselves for not having thought to wear makeup.

Or dressing up like Kim Basinger in Boxing Helena! He probably would have enjoyed that. Anyway, here is the second student's piece:
It's a birthday party at Caf Bottega and everyone is excused in advance. The girls' tops are starting to slip as they dance in private circles, the boys in a parody of stealth sidling up behind them and arhythmically grazing against their hips and asses. Everyone's singing or screaming—it's hard to tell who's doing what.
The more forward ones are already pairing off: they're trading phone numbers and tequila shots, or they have their arms draped around each other's necks and waists, and their heads are bowed, and they dance slow.
Audrey's sitting at the bar. There's a group loosely affiliated with her standing and ordering drinks. "I just don't know how not to be single," one girl's noisily telling a boy. He seems understanding. "Now that I'm in a relationship," she says, "I just keep seeing all these people I should have fucked when I had the chance."
"I wanted him so much," Audrey says.
"Who?" I ask as I sit down.
"I'm at the dinner for Alec Baldwin. I'm wearing this low-cut dress and I'm like he's not going to talk to me but I want to look nice. And Sam, he's locked into me the entire time." She grabs my neck and pulls me towards her. "He's looking at me like this and them he says, what are you doing after this? And I say I'm going to see Lulu at the Rep—I have a friend in it—so he comes with me and he sits through this shit play for two hours and, Sam, he's got his arm around me the whole time."
"Was he sleazy?"
"No, he was charming. I've never met anyone that charming. He asked me if I had a boyfriend and I told him all about Psycho Jeff and what he did when we broke up, and he started telling me all about Kim Basinger and how she was bipolar and we connected. But he's old. He kept asking me how old I was, if I was sure I was 20."
"That's charming."
"And then he walks me back to my dorm"
"Did you sleep with him."
"No, he gave me his number. I should have. He asked me if I wanted to come to New York with him for the weekend. I said I was busy and he gavbe me his number. He told me to call him whenever I'm in New York."
"That's awesome," I say and we hug each other. "Careful Aud," I say, laughing. "I've seen how full of yourself you get when something like this happens. I won't be able to talk to you for weeks."
"I know," she says. She's smiling broadly. "All I want is to go to New York. I don't care about anybody else. Fuck you all," she shouts at the dance floor, although the music's so loud that nobody turns. "Fuck you all," she tries again, "Alec Baldwin wants me."
Audrey, honey, darling. Seriously, call us. We'd like you to begin saving your voicemails.

UPDATE: It wasn't Audrey.

]]>
Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:05:49 EDT Doree Shafrir http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=255306&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Christie Brinkley Likes Loud Noises, Bright Lights ]]> christie brinkleyIn an attempt to claw back some of its eroding market share from viewers of televised women's lacrosse and fishing-with-dynamite enthusiasts, the National Hockey League has turned to the advertisers' favorite option for product promotion: Celebrities. Luminaries such as Christie Brinkley, Lil John, and one of the guys from "Brothers & Sisters" will "write exclusive blogs and provide original video content to offer fans a unique perspective of the Stanley Cup Playoffs." Ooh, famous people and interactivity! Let's see how it's going! From Brinkley's blog:

I feel like there is so much skill here. They're doing the most amazing things and they're on the slippery ice doing it! It's so exciting. I can't help it, I'm hooked. It was incredible action. These giants that become so graceful on the ice, they're all pure macho grace - amazing speed, lightning turns, and their size is amazing. But if you step away from the action and look around, you really get a treat. The arena itself is so alive; every inch of the volume of the interior is full of action and sound. Whether it's the flashing lights, the horns, the giant car floats that go through the air, or the fans themselves who are all so fun and friendly, it's just a huge loud 'fun.' Every inch of that arena is a spectacle. The game brings the entire place to life. And I've lived in that {Nassau} Coliseum for a long time. I've been there for all different kinds of events, but the way hockey fills it up, there is nothing like it.
Not a Billy Joel concert, that's for goddamned sure.

Christie Brinkley's confusing-to-navigate blog [NHL.com]

]]>
Mon, 09 Apr 2007 17:35:50 EDT abalk2 http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=250845&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ How to Improve 'Times' Writing: A Novella ]]> 20060508nytwriting.jpgTimesman Rick Berke was promoted in January to become the paper's assistant managing editor for news. In that capacity, as Bill Keller noted in the memo announcing the move, Berke would count among his duties supervising "a serious conversation about the quality of writing at the paper." So, pray tell, what do you think would increase the quality of writing in the Times? We'd suggest starting with the lengths of stories — and Berke says he agrees. Which is why it's quite so amusing that the first fruits of that "serious discussion" — released at the very end of the day Friday, which a serious newsman like Berke would no doubt find a curious time for a major organization to be releasing information — is a memo that runs to 29 pages (including the lovely MSWord-designed cover, above right).

After the jump, the one-page cover note to the 29-page memo. And then the full memo — PDFed for your convenience — is here.

From:
To: newsroom@nytimes.com
Sent: Fri, 5 May 2006 17:17:20 -0400
Subject: A Note from Rick Berke

To The Staff:

We are embarking on a newsroomwide effort to make the best-written newspaper even better written.

The effort began with an exercise last November, when Bill and Jill and I asked an assortment of reporters and editors to examine the writing in every Page One article over a 10-day period and to then file a memo. (We will focus on writing throughout the paper, but figured that A-1 is a good place to start, and most of the same lessons apply.)

The results (in memos excerpted below) were loud and clear: While The Times is a daily showcase of amazing writing, we can do even better. Some of the memos are particularly short because we excised some direct critiques.

We hope that these observations will be enlightening and encourage everyone to think more about writing. From all the different perspectives, the following themes emerged from the memos:

— We have too many anecdotal leads and often don't think creatively about other approaches.

— Stories don't get to the point soon enough, and they run on too long.

— We pack too much material into ledes.

— We often don't lace breaking news stories with enough drama or sense of the moment.

As Bill Keller said of these memos: "One of the most salient points that people made was that we have this habit of saving the good writing for the features, whereas most of what we do is news stories, and people don't feel the same obligation or desire to write those stories. Those are the stories, you've got them by the throat most of the time because news happens. Something blew up, something happened. Those are the stories where we really need the writing most. I'd like a lot more unorthodox approaches to conventional news stories."

We know it's not always possible to meet these goals. First, there are deadline pressures. Second, there are the interminable demands from editors about making sure certain points are moved higher. Then there are the demands that articles be cut.

But the central point is that writing does matter. We see these memos as a starting point. We will continue this conversation during lunches we are having with editors and reporters throughout the paper.

In the meantime, take a look at these memos, which offer eye-opening insights and wise tips about framing stories.

Rick

Writing for The New York Times [PDF]
































]]>
Mon, 08 May 2006 15:15:02 EDT Jesse http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=172281&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ How to Have a Sulzbergerian Career ]]> 20060223brown.jpgIt's damned hard to find decent, interesting writing jobs these days, as we all know. And it's even hard for recent graduates of prestigious Ivy League schools.

That's why two enterprising Brown undergrads are today holding a "Writing Beyond Brown" symposium on their Providence campus. The best way to learn about the "writing business," these organizers say, "is by hearing the stories of alums who found their way into the world of writing after Brown." And to that end they've corralled an impressive lineup: a Wall Street Journal columnist, the Mr. and Mrs. Smith screenwriter, a novelist, a Times stringer. But the panelist we'd be most interested in learning from is a recent grad who stuck around and made good at the local paper: "Just two years after graduating from Brown, Arthur Sulzberger '04 writes for the Providence Journal."

However did he get that great gig? If you're reading us on College Hill right now, and if you've got some time to spare, head on over to Petterutti Lounge for the symposium, which runs from 4 to 6 o'clock. We'd love to learn how someday we can get on the same career path as young Arthur Sulzberger.

(Really, we would love to know about, from someone up there. Anonymity will be protected, as always — unless you don't want it to be.)

The Write Stuff [Brown Daily Herald]

]]>
Thu, 23 Feb 2006 15:46:58 EST Jesse http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=156640&view=rss&microfeed=true