<![CDATA[Gawker: wwd]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: wwd]]> http://gawker.com/tag/wwd http://gawker.com/tag/wwd <![CDATA[Faux Charity Fashion's Night Out Only Raised Imaginary Money]]> Girl, we're still in recovery from Fashion's Night Out. Too bad the charitable arm of Anna Wintour's Make-People-Like-Me Tour 2009 didn't translate into cash for retailers. But nobody cares because the party was that fierce.

It's kind of like waking up in a strange man's bed with white powder all over your nose, but not really caring about your lost dignity because you managed to weasel your way into the Jane Hotel and hobnob with famous people. WWD reports that traffic to stores in Manhattan was up 50 percent thanks to the parties and celebrity appearances, even though the amount of revenue taken in wasn't up all that much.

Some consumers sought to connect, if not transact, with the designers making store appearances; others came to socialize and grab a drink, while a minority did actually shop. Several retailers told WWD that Fashion's Night Out, during which more than 700 stores stayed open until 11 p.m. and offered events, celebrities and designers, did lift the day's business. However, most emphasized the main purpose was to bring fun to the stores.

That's right. Since no one has any money anymore, stores are no longer for shopping, they are for getting drinks from Olsen twins, spotting Posh Spice, and watching André Leon Talley lounge around in his latest tent and host a game show. We can now close all the nightclubs, we have stores!

Our favorite quote is from Brooks Brothers bigwig Claudio Del Vecchio:

We do a lot of events, and we generally don't get a lot of business from them...The best thing about Fashion's Night Out is that a lot of people came out and are still looking at shopping in a positive way, even if they didn't shop.

Isn't that like discharging an anorexic from the hospital and saying, "well, she now has a positive view of food, even if she's still not eating." Everyone has a positive view of shopping. Who doesn't love shopping? We'd do it every day, if we could. The problem isn't that people don't like shopping, it's that they have no fucking money! No matter how many times you trot Oscar de la Renta out to sing with Barbara Walters, Bette Midler, and Sarah Jessica Parker, we're still not going to be able to afford the socks at his store. Until everyone can do something about that, all Fashion's Night Out is going to be is just what the fashion world doesn't need—another excuse to get drunk.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5359020&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Barbara Corcoran, Classic New York Broad]]> The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.Barbara Corcoran, founder of the Corcoran Group and the Today Show's resident real estate expert person, is sort of a living legend in New York. Everyone knows her name. But do you know the secret to her success? Dick jokes!

Corcoran, whose track record in her two years as a real estate analyst for NBC is almost as horrendous as Jim Kramer's is as a financial analyst, is the subject of a Women's Wear Daily profile that revealed some somewhat surprising tidbits about Corcoran's penchant for potty-mouthery, something she claims has helped her get ahead in business.

"I got a complaint yesterday for using foul language in a speech I gave," Corcoran says. "I said, ‘holy s—t.' I mean, what other word can you use? There's no other word you can substitute for that. People loved my language. I usually get compliments on it. It makes them trust me. They say ‘She tells it like it is.'"

In fact, there are dozens of phrases one can substitute for holy s—t starting with "oh my gosh," but Corcoran avoids them when possible because they do not fit as readily within her media persona.

She tells dirty jokes, uses bad words, and makes vaguely inappropriate comments about your physical appearance less because she's a different kind of real estate broker than because she's selling you the idea of a different kind of real estate broker. By being ever so slightly inappropriate (more PG-13 than R rated) she says, "I'm your friend, not your salesperson." It's smart, another way to close the deal.

And naturally, Corcoran isn't shy about infusing her game with a little girly fliration.

"She was constantly telling her brokers how attractive they were," recalls a former Corcoran underling. "The first time I was in the office she felt my butt and said something like, ‘Welcome to the office.' Or she'd squeeze a guy's arm and say ‘You're so muscular.' She's not hitting on you, she's selling you. It usually works."

We suppose this all shouldn't be too surprising. After all, this is the same Barbara Corcoran who dropped her pants in the Central Park Boathouse to show off her ass to John Stossel and a group of her friends two years ago.

All told, we have to admit—We've kind of got a bit of a "Mrs. Robinson" crush on Barbara Corcoran. She'd probably destroy us though. Sigh.


For Barbara Corcoran, the Housing Crisis is a Glass Half Full
[WWD]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5311619&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Women's Wear Daily Horns In On Our Dirty Headlines]]> "Hey, why should Gawker be the only ones to use inappropriate and suggestive headlines? We can do it, too!" [WWD]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5102174&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Conde Nast Folds DNR]]> Conde Nast is folding DNR, the men's fashion trade magazine. It's also shuttering its website, DNRNews.com. The feeble spin is that WWD will pick up the slack by launching "comprehensive, round-the-clock men’s fashion and retail coverage." [#2 of the ">four ways to kill a magazine, for those keeping track]. Points to the PR department for attempting to create an upside. But it's clear that this is evidence of weakness in the fashion category specifically, and more momentum for the scary Great Magazine Die-off in general. The company hasn't announced how many layoffs will go along with DNR's death, but departing staffers with more details can email us.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5095103&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[WWD Staff In Uproar Over Being Made To Write Advertorial Fluff]]> "Fashion Rocks" is Conde Nast's big advertorial extravaganza pegged to Fashion Week, when the magazine company can sell extra ad space to all its fashion advertisers in a fluffy, profile-heavy special supplements. But we hear that the staff of the Conde-owned WWD is currently embroiled in a mini-revolt, after they were ordered to write the copy for the 48-page Fashion Rocks supplement that went out with yesterday's issue. There's no reason an editorial staff should ever be made to write advertorial copy. The most egregious line-crossing of all: a full-page interview in the supplement with Richard Beckman, Conde Nast's own head of marketing.

Beckman, of course, would be the mastermind of the entire Fashion Rocks campaign, so what the hell is a fluff interview of him doing in a WWD-penned special supplement, posing as legit editorial copy? Staffers there are asking themselves the same thing. They feel that Mary Berner, who formerly led Fairchild and WWD before it was all absorbed into Conde Nast, would never have stood for such a thing.

On MediaPost yesterday, Ari Rosenberg decried the whole ongoing degeneration of the advertising/ editorial line. "Today's media-buying demand for a 'big idea' required to earn a media commitment, combined with a softer and more competitive environment, all driven by a sales force that has no idea who Henry Luce is, have publishers doing things not done before," he wrote.

Which leads to this:

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5046124&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Corrections Of The Week: Stalkers, Affairs And WWD]]> Sosorry

The unfortunate forgot-you-were-dead San Antonio Express-News wasn't the only one screwing up this week.

*WWD landed a scoop a couple of days ago, with the news that Portfolio had hired away Newsweek's fashion correspondent, Dana Thomas (and for quite the chunk of change, is the rumor!) Unfortunately, the item had an error or two. Or three. Today the fashion Bible runs a correction that's almost as long as the original piece, but only after what we hear were two days of wrangling between Thomas and the magazine. "I simply wanted to hold up the good standards of journalism imparted to me by Ben Bradlee: 'Get It Right,'" Thomas told us. [WWD]

*Newsday wants to make sure you know exactly where a man charged with stalking lives, so in Tuesday editions, they corrected his house number, which they got wrong the first time around. Happy hunting! [Newsday]

*The Los Angeles Times is no homewrecker: "A Critic's Notebook in Sunday's Arts &#38; Music section said that the late pianist and composer Ervin Nyiregyh&#225;zi probably had an affair with the wife of conductor Artur Rodzinski. He did not." Good to know! [LAT]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5002795&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA['Portfolio' Snags 'Newsweek' Fashion Guru, MemoPad Gets Confused]]> In yet another example of Portfolio's tossing around their coin, the flagging Conde Nast title has now snagged Dana Thomas, the Paris-based Newsweek fashion correspondent. Thomas is the author of Deluxe, an inside look at the decline of the luxury brand, the bestseller of which we were big fans. We're guessing Thomas herself wasn't a huge fan of the errors in the WWD MemoPad item about her big move today. Her upcoming book tour is headed to Australia, not Argentina, and if luxury execs have complained about the book's inaccuracies, they're only talking to WWD.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=350600&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Fibby 'Interview' Flack Says Editor Sischy Is Quitting After All]]> WWD is reporting that editor Ingrid Sischy is leaving Interview magazine. Funny that, because 14 days ago, when we reported the rumor that Sischy was on her way out, whopper-master and Interview spokeslady Rachna Shah said this to the Observer: "The Gawker item is absolutely not true." WWD got a tetch hissy with us via email. "You guys jumped the gun on that," they wrote. Goodness. WWD's long piece today on Sischy's life and times at Andy Warhol's Interview doesn't mention their original story. To be fair, it's possible that Shah's bosses might have given the flack false information. Not uncommon, but always uncommonly silly. Whoops! The renowned Sischy is leaving the paper after a 23-year tenure, citing partner Sandra Brant's decision to sell her interest in Brant Publications, Interview's parent company. After the jump, Interview's press release on Sischy's departure. At least, that's what we think it is. UPDATE: From a partner at consulting firm HLGroup: "Neither the client nor the publicist involved passed on incorrect information. When the question was asked 14 days ago, Ingrid Sischy was in fact on holiday in South Africa. She had not resigned, nor was her intention at that time to resign."

Renowned Editor of Interview Magazine Ingrid Sischy Resigns After 18 Years



NEW YORK, Jan. 23 /PRNewswire/ — Ingrid Sischy today announced her resignation as Editor-in-Chief of Interview Magazine. "I have had the honor of editing one of the most unique titles in magazine publishing and working with tremendously talented people in our industry. With Sandra Brant's decision to sell her interest in Brant Publications, it is only appropriate that I resign at this time. Sandy and I have worked together as a team, and that has been a huge part of the fun of it. While it is difficult to contemplate being away from this extraordinary experience, the time is right and Interview is firmly positioned for even greater success," Sischy commented.

Over Ms. Sischy's tenure she has built Interview into an internationally recognized title that covers the world of art, fashion, entertainment and pop culture. During her more than 18 year tenure as Editor-in-Chief the circulation of the magazine has grown significantly and has become a mainstay vehicle for marketers around the world who are interested in reaching a discerning, culturally aware audience.

"When I was first drafted as editor after Andy Warhol's death I thought I'd stay a few years, devote myself to helping the magazine find its post-Warhol life, and then get back to my writing. Although leaving the magazine and wonderful staff behind is difficult, it is the right decision and one that will allow the new owners to establish their own editorial stamp on the magazine. I am now more than ever, eager to get back to my writing and have several big projects in front of me that need my attention"

"Managing such an important part of Andy Warhol's legacy has been a huge responsibility and I am proud of what Sandy and my editorial team have accomplished in terms of content and growth. I wish everyone the best of luck and hope this great American magazine will continue to flourish," Sischy concluded.

"Ingrid has done a masterful job of making Interview successful. When she first arrived here after Andy's death the future of the magazine was in question and there was an enormous amount of anxiety. She not only moved us through that period but has taken the magazine to a level of success and recognition that is beyond anything we thought possible. Her leadership, thoughtfulness, journalistic expertise and editorial vision have been critical," Sandra Brant commented.

Ms. Sischy started her career at Artforum Magazine in 1979 and is a widely published author on a range of cultural subjects. She has contributed to a broad range of magazines, including The New York Times, and has been the fashion and photography critic for The New Yorker. In 1996 she was the Artistic Director of the first Florence Fashion Biennale, conceiving and organizing the exhibition which occupied 26 museums throughout Florence, Italy and its outskirts. Part of this exhibition was subsequently presented at the Guggenheim Museum. Sischy has been a contributing editor for Vanity Fair since 1997. A graduate of Sarah Lawrence College, she received an honorary PhD in the humanities from the Moore College of Art in 1987.
]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5002521&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The Harper's Bazaar Pictures Of Hillary Clinton In A Fancy Frock]]> Before Hillary Clinton showed us that she really does wear her heart on her sleeve (and it's a ladylike sleeve!) she backed out of a Vogue photo shoot because she was afraid of looking too feminine. Editor Anna Wintour was irked. But the Democratic candidate is featured in a February issue of Harper's Bazaar, along with six of the other running candidates. She is not, despite earlier reports, wearing a miniskirt and heels. After the jump, see the pictures of Clinton in all her high couture glory.

prices.jpg Arianna Huffington pens the accompanying story, in which she touts Hillary's "evolving styles (including her Oscar de la Renta pantsuits, which she pays for herself)." Maybe so, but wearing $12,369 on your person being photographed with ladies (sorry Senator!) wearing $12,000 between them (on left, CBS Newser Hannah Storm) while you go around being oh-so vague about how you're going to pay for that universal healthcare plan doesn't really fly right. Also in the spread—Michael Bloomberg! Who is totally not running for anything at all.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=348047&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Panty-Clad Anna Wintour!]]> WWD notes that Stardolls has added a Vogue editor Anna Wintour doll to their digital collection—and Jeff Bercovici at Portfolio notes that she is basically naked. We are going to be Photoshopping outfits on her ALL DAY LONG. (Wintour's doll is much prettier than Perez's!)

Anna Wintour as You've Never Seen Her [Portfolio]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=330740&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Reporter Jeff Bercovici, who got his start...]]> Reporter Jeff Bercovici, who got his start (as far as we're concerned!) at WWD, is leaving Radar for... wait for it... Portfolio! To BLOG. Enjoy blogging, blogsy! Blog it up! Though he'll stay at Radar as a contributing editor.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=283406&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[You've got to hand it to the Post: Buried...]]> You've got to hand it to the Post: Buried at the bottom of this item about Marc Jacobs (who, we're told, once was some kind of designer or something?) is this classic disclaimer: "We didn't call Jacobs for comment because the last time we did, his rep leaked the story to WWD." [NYP]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=282653&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA['WWD' Stands By Story, Won't Run It Again]]> This editor's note concerning a recent Jacob Bernstein profile of Hollywood gossip Nikki Finkke ran in today's Women's Wear Daily. According to Keith Kelly, WWD won't repost the story because "there is a legal question about whether one blanket 'yes you can tape [the conversation]' covered all subsequent follow-up interviews." Our immediate reaction was on what planet? But the planet is California. So we guess it's a cautionary tale for New Yorkers interviewing Californians. Or anyone interviewing Nikki Finke. Update: The whole story is online elsewhere.

Ironic [NYP]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=279619&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Us Weekly's Brand Is Truth]]> A two-page spread in this week's Us Weekly calling out other magazines for fabricating stories has their competitors scoffing. "I find it amusing that Us Weekly and [editor in chief] Janice Min thinks they are above all else in the celebrity category of weekly gossip magazines. How can she point fingers when Page Six had to run a retraction from picking up her stories in the last year?" a Star spokesman asked WWD today. "We don't say that we don't make mistakes; that is the nature of any news gathering operation. What we don't do is wholesale fabricate stories to sell magazines," a Wenner spokesman responded. No, never! But fabricating controversy is another story, apparently, as a peek at the 2-page spread in question, headlined "Creative Writing: All The News That's Fake!" reveals.

For starters, all the "fake" stories that Us is refuting are stories that it has reported, with perhaps a slightly more conservative spin, in recent issues. Sure, Life&Style maybe went out on a limb by implying that Brad and Angelina were "living separate lives." But in this same issue of Us, Angelina is reported as having given Olivier Martinez a "lap dance." Just as hollow is Us's refutation of last week's Star Tom and Katie "Divorce!" cover: "Troubles? Yes. But divorce? Not in discussion... Pal Jenna Elfman told Us... 'they're together.'" Oh, okay, as long as Jenna Elfman says so!

Calling out OK! for predicting the demise of J. Lo's marriage prematurely was, of course, a safe bet. But the critique of In Touch's "Surprise Boob Jobs" cover is the story's most toothless, since the article in question didn't actually allege that anyone besides Heidi Montag had one, and that is just sort of like "duh!" Also, Us's rebuttal ("The Truth") begins,"A rep for Simpson, 26, denied that the D-cup singer got a lift or implants." Well, as everyone knows, publicists never lie. And neither does Us Weekly.

Taking Shots
[WWD]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=257733&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Does Cindy Adams Hate Rupert Murdoch?]]> Rosie O'Donnell's raunchy emceeing had the ladies at the N.Y. Women in Communications luncheon hiding under their tables in homophobic, offended shame! Either that, or she had everyone in stitches. It depends whether you ask Richard Johnson or Cindy Adams. The Page Six overlord made sure to mention the "17 sweet-faced high school girls who won scholarships to pursue their dreams of careers in media," whose virgin ears were ostensibly traumatized when Rosie "concluded a rant about Donald Trump by grabbing her crotch and shouting, 'Eat me!'" But his gossiping colleague Cindy had a different take: "In elegant clothes instead of her usual sweatshirt, newly smart-looking Rosie O'Donnell emceed. Hilarious." How to make sense of it all? Well, WWD mentions that "emcee Rosie O'Donnell skewer[ed] Rupert Murdoch, who presented an award to Cindy Adams, and the New York Post at every opportunity." Hot! Cindy Adams is a dangerous dissident trying to take down the Post from within!

Great Eights Get Coveted Awards [Cindy]
Rosie Grosses Out Media Elite [Page Six]
Women of Honor [WWD]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=254772&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Marc Jacobs Back In Rehab]]> Designer and tastemaker Marc Jacobs flew directly to a drug and alcohol rehabilitation facility in Arizona the day after showing his Louis Vuitton collection in Paris, WWD reports. "Marc made the right decision," said Jacobs' longtime business partner Robert Duffy "He'd been sober for seven years. When he relapsed, he wanted to deal with it right away ... Obviously, our prayers are with him." "Great, now the bags are going to be even more expensive," a stylish friend of ours ... um, prayed.

Marc Jacobs In Rehab [WWD]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=243573&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Bill Keller Explains His New Passion For Fashion]]> Okay, so Times executive editor Bill Keller doesn't really fetishize Nicolas Ghesqui re's inventive prints. "I'm a fan of blue jeans and T-shirts," he told WWD yesterday. So what was he doing in the front row at Balenciaga? Something to do with "a new level of editorial marketing amid stiff competition for readers and ad dollars," WWD surmises. Keller addressed Times critic Cathy Horyn's recent banning from Dolce & Gabbana (and her rumored pending ban from Vera Wang): "I always think that's self-defeating when they shut out the journalists." Well put, sir! He'll be wearing a deconstructed feathered corset by the end of the week, we just know it. This is just like his Baghdad tour, only less dangerous!

Paper Chase [WWD]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=240681&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Gillian Hearst-Shaw Is Nepotastic!]]> What do you do when your sister got all the model-pretty genes and your 'socialite' reality show never got produced? Well, if you're Gillian Hearst-Shaw, you go into the family business. According to WWD, the socialite has been "quietly working" as an editorial assistant at Town & Country's semiannual wedding and quarterly travel magazines—her family has an ownership stake in, natch—since early January. "Not only do I get to learn and work, I also get to learn and work at a family company," Hearst-Shaw cooed to WWD. But will her assistanting duties get in the way of her wedding plans? (Hearst was given a "blindingly huge diamond engagement ring" last weekend in the Berkshires by her lawyer boyfriend Christian Simonds). We hope not! She tells WWD that charges of nepotism just make her want to "work that much harder" to prove that she deserves her job. You go, girl!

All in the Family [WWD]
Ready to Wed [NYP]
Earlier: Debutard Derby: 'Social' Reality Show?

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=239145&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA['Stuff' Lagerfeld Joke Offends Chunkies, Cat People]]> karlskinny.jpgNewish Stuff editor Dan Bova's first editor's letter is a sendup of Chanel designer/vampire-grampy Karl Lagerfeld. According to WWD, Bova "wrote the editor's letter of his first full issue in the supposed voice of Karl Lagerfeld, focusing mostly on what Bova fabricates is the designer's taste for eating cats." We suppose this is what Dan is getting at when he says that Stuff is making a "concerted effort to go upscale," but we're unconvinced. We're talking about the author of the Karl Lagerfeld Diet here, the man who once said that his "only ambition in life" is to fit into size 28 jeans. You think he'd really be caught dead ingesting a calorie-crammed, full-fat feline?

Let Them Eat Cats
[WWD]

Karl Lagerfeld, Boy Prince of Fashion
[NYMag]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=236956&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[How Is This Socialite Different From All Other Socialites?]]> claire%20bernard.jpgOur feverish excitement about Fash Week has led us to peek into some darker nooks and crannies of the internet than usual; here's a nugget we turned up about socialite Claire Bernard, who mingled with the 'Tinz et al at that One Scottsdale/Vogue Italia party last night.
Meanwhile, One Scottsdale, the latest luxury mega-mall, celebrated Fashion Week far from its Arizona home—like any good tourist—with drinks at Amy Sacco's Bette. Amongst the crowd, co-hosts Tinsley Mortimer and Theodora Richards greeted friends like Annie Churchill and Claire Bernard (taking a night off from doing homework for her MFA at Columbia).
We flipped through the student directory, and sure enough, Claire's on her way to becoming a bona fide Writer with a capital W! We can only hope that she'll heed Cary Tennis's words of wisdom, and not rely on her writing to support her.

Fashion On Site
[WWD]

Earlier:Breaking: Creative Writing MFA Student Unconvinced Of Own Brilliance

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=233626&view=rss&microfeed=true