<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gawker: Times]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gawker.com/tag/times</link>
		<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://gawker.superfeedr.com/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" />
		<description><![CDATA[Gawker posts tagged Times]]></description>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Brooklynites Blessing the Hudson Valley With Hipness]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Brooklynites Blessing the Hudson Valley With Hipness" href="http://gawker.com/trendwatch/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">trendwatch</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Brooklynites Blessing the Hudson Valley With Hipness" href="http://gawker.com/5828428/brooklynites-blessing-the-hudson-valley-with-hipness" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Brooklynites Blessing the Hudson Valley With Hipness" alt="Click here to read Brooklynites Blessing the Hudson Valley With Hipness" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/08/small_hudson.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				"You can't keep a good creative down," as the old saying goes. When pushed out of their community by <a href="http://gawker.com/5712521/the-guardian-discovers-williamsburg-and-gentrification">covert gentrification</a>, <a href="http://gawker.com/5758165/new-york-times-dispatches-intrepid-explorer-to-mysterious-brooklyn">overt invasion</a>, and other insidiousnesses, good creatives will simply move elsewhere and establish new, even more authentic communities. This is how the Land of NoBro came to pass.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5828428/brooklynites-blessing-the-hudson-valley-with-hipness" title="Click here to read more about Brooklynites Blessing the Hudson Valley With Hipness">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5828428/brooklynites-blessing-the-hudson-valley-with-hipness]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5828428]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[trendwatch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Art]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Beacon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Brooklyn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Carroll]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Dia:beacon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Eckert]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fine]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fort]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gardens]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Greene]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hudson valley]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Main]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[melissa auf der maur]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Millerton]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Moviehouse]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[New]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[New Paltz]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Nobro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Oakhurst]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[On]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Soho nostalgia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Story]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Street]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tony stone' rosedale brooklynization ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[trend]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Woodstock bushwick]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[York]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 06 Aug 2011 19:41:30 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lauri Apple]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5828428&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The New First Date]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read The New First Date" href="http://gawker.com/modern-love/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">modernlove</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read The New First Date" href="http://gawker.com/5579013/the-new-first-date" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read The New First Date" alt="Click here to read The New First Date" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2012/01/small_bed598deb32b714cc0ab68530f60a960.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Is there anything worse than a first date? It's as if a condemned man was forced to eat his last meal with some random girl his friend knows from grad school.  But first dates are getting worse! They're getting quirkier.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5579013/the-new-first-date" title="Click here to read more about The New First Date">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5579013/the-new-first-date]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5579013]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[modern love]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Dating]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Howaboutwe.com]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[New]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tweet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[York]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 03 Jul 2010 13:06:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5579013&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[In Twist of Fate, Fat May Shrink Brains]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read In Twist of Fate, Fat May Shrink Brains" href="http://gawker.com/science/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">science</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read In Twist of Fate, Fat May Shrink Brains" href="http://gawker.com/5343847/in-twist-of-fate-fat-may-shrink-brains" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read In Twist of Fate, Fat May Shrink Brains" alt="Click here to read In Twist of Fate, Fat May Shrink Brains" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2009/08/custom_1251077320511_greenbrain_01.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Fat: it's good for lewd and cruel jokes, but it's not so good for your health - including that of your brains. It eats them!				<a href="http://gawker.com/5343847/in-twist-of-fate-fat-may-shrink-brains" title="Click here to read more about In Twist of Fate, Fat May Shrink Brains">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5343847/in-twist-of-fate-fat-may-shrink-brains]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5343847]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Cintra]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Is]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[more]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Need]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[New]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Of]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[UCLA]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[We]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[what]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wilson]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[York]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 23 Aug 2009 21:28:19 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Belonsky]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5343847&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Unemployed's Newest Enemy: Cheap Credit Reports]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read The Unemployed's Newest Enemy: Cheap Credit Reports" href="http://gawker.com/funemployment/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">funemployment</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read The Unemployed's Newest Enemy: Cheap Credit Reports" href="http://gawker.com/5332119/the-unemployeds-newest-enemy-cheap-credit-reports" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read The Unemployed's Newest Enemy: Cheap Credit Reports" alt="Click here to read The Unemployed's Newest Enemy: Cheap Credit Reports" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2009/08/custom_1249634202406_unemployed-artist_preview.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				As if America's jobless weren't screwed enough &mdash; more employers are running credit checks on potential employees for jobs that involve no financial decisions, so you'd better pay your bills on time even if you don't have a job!				<a href="http://gawker.com/5332119/the-unemployeds-newest-enemy-cheap-credit-reports" title="Click here to read more about The Unemployed's Newest Enemy: Cheap Credit Reports">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5332119/the-unemployeds-newest-enemy-cheap-credit-reports]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5332119]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Funemployment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA['The]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Credit]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[New]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Recessionomics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Reports]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Times"]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[unemployed]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[York]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 07 Aug 2009 04:43:32 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Cajun Boy]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5332119&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Naked Children Terrorizing America's Olds and Gays]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Naked Children Terrorizing America's Olds and Gays" href="http://gawker.com/parenting/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">parenting</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Naked Children Terrorizing America's Olds and Gays" href="http://gawker.com/5315802/naked-children-terrorizing-americas-olds-and-gays" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Naked Children Terrorizing America's Olds and Gays" alt="Click here to read Naked Children Terrorizing America's Olds and Gays" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/11/small_custom_1247723381558_Children_Without_Clothes_-_When_Do_They_Need_a_Fig_Leaf.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Question: How can the children be the future of America when they, the children, yearn to be naked, and their liberal, Obama-loving parents allow them to run around with their little wee-wees and va-jay-jays hanging out all over the place?				<a href="http://gawker.com/5315802/naked-children-terrorizing-americas-olds-and-gays" title="Click here to read more about Naked Children Terrorizing America's Olds and Gays">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5315802/naked-children-terrorizing-americas-olds-and-gays]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5315802]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gays]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Hate]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Kids]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Naked]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[New]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Olds]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Parents' liberals ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[The]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[We]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[York]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Your]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 16 Jul 2009 01:49:12 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Cajun Boy]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5315802&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Was Nick Kristof's Wife a Goldman Sachs Layoff Victim?]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Was Nick Kristof's Wife a Goldman Sachs Layoff Victim?" href="http://gawker.com/sheryl-wudunn/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">sherylwudunn</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Was Nick Kristof's Wife a Goldman Sachs Layoff Victim?" href="http://gawker.com/5101009/was-nick-kristofs-wife-a-goldman-sachs-layoff-victim" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Was Nick Kristof's Wife a Goldman Sachs Layoff Victim?" alt="Click here to read Was Nick Kristof's Wife a Goldman Sachs Layoff Victim?" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/12/wudunn2.jpeg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Tragedy of the elite: we hear that <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheryl_WuDunn">Sheryl WuDunn</a>, the wife of <em>Times</em> columnist <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged NICK KRISTOF" title="Click here to read more posts tagged NICK KRISTOF" href="http://gawker.com/tag/nick-kristof/">Nick Kristof</a>, has been laid off from her job as a private wealth advisor at Goldman Sachs&mdash;a casualty of Goldman's plan to<a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/reuters/2008/10/23/business/OUKBS-UK-GOLDMAN-JOBS.php"> cut 10% of staff</a>. She was a longtime journalist, and wrote for the <em>Times</em>, Reuters, and the WSJ before going into banking. She married Kristof in 1988 and <a href="http://sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Sheryl_WuDunn">won a Pulitzer in 1990 </a>for her reporting in Beijing. Rather ironic that the journalist in the family is now the breadwinner over the banker, no? The lesson here: just when you thought you were getting out of the crappy journalism industry... it PULLS YOU BACK IN! And lays you off at your <em>new </em>job. Care to watch Nick and Sheryl appear together on <em>Charlie Rose</em> back in happier days? Then click through to do so!				<a href="http://gawker.com/5101009/was-nick-kristofs-wife-a-goldman-sachs-layoff-victim" title="Click here to read more about Was Nick Kristof's Wife a Goldman Sachs Layoff Victim?">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5101009/was-nick-kristofs-wife-a-goldman-sachs-layoff-victim]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5101009]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[sheryl wudunn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Rumormonger]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[journalismism]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nick kristof]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Nyt]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[the rich]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:11:30 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5101009&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Bruni Needs Braaiiiinnnnnnssss]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Bruni Needs Braaiiiinnnnnnssss" href="http://gawker.com/frank-bruni/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">frankbruni</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Bruni Needs Braaiiiinnnnnnssss" href="http://gawker.com/5066074/bruni-needs-braaiiiinnnnnnssss" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Bruni Needs Braaiiiinnnnnnssss" alt="Click here to read Bruni Needs Braaiiiinnnnnnssss" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/10/frankbruni2.jpeg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Cosmopolitan<em> Times</em> restaurant critic Frank Bruni: "Taste is personal. For instance, I love the texture and consistency of lamb hearts, and for some reason the idea that they’re hearts doesn't bother me emotionally or intellectually — doesn't give me any pause. I love the custard-like richness of brain, though I admit that for some reason I have to make a bit of an effort to edit out my consciousness (and I’m not making a cute joke here) that it’s brain I’m eating." Fine, just put down the knife and we'll bring you whatever you want. [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/20/business/media/20askthetimes.html?pagewanted=all">NYT</a>]				<a href="http://gawker.com/5066074/bruni-needs-braaiiiinnnnnnssss" title="Click here to read more about Bruni Needs Braaiiiinnnnnnssss">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5066074/bruni-needs-braaiiiinnnnnnssss]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5066074]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Frank Bruni]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Critics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Restaurants]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:20:27 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5066074&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Great For The Thrifty Klansman]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Great For The Thrifty Klansman" href="http://gawker.com/pic-of-the-day/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">picoftheday</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Great For The Thrifty Klansman" href="http://gawker.com/5065024/great-for-the-thrifty-klansman" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Great For The Thrifty Klansman" alt="Click here to read Great For The Thrifty Klansman" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/10/KKKhouse.jpeg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				The <em>Times</em> shows us "<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/15/greathomesanddestinations/15gh-what.html">What You Get for...$1.2 Million</a>": a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2008/10/14/greathomesanddestinations/20081014_WYG_SLIDESHOW_2.html"> house </a>on six acres in Massachusetts with four bedrooms, four bathrooms, and "KKK" posted above the back door. Click to enlarge.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5065024/great-for-the-thrifty-klansman" title="Click here to read more about Great For The Thrifty Klansman">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5065024/great-for-the-thrifty-klansman]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5065024]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Pic Of The Day]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Houses]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Kkk]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wtf]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 17 Oct 2008 11:03:43 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5065024&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[We're Sorry For Making You Quit The New York Times, Sharon Waxman]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read We're Sorry For Making You Quit The &lt;em&gt;New York Times&lt;/em&gt;, Sharon Waxman" href="http://gawker.com/sharon-waxman/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">sharonwaxman</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read We're Sorry For Making You Quit The &lt;em&gt;New York Times&lt;/em&gt;, Sharon Waxman" href="http://gawker.com/5060244/were-sorry-for-making-you-quit-the-new-york-times-sharon-waxman" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read We're Sorry For Making You Quit The &lt;em&gt;New York Times&lt;/em&gt;, Sharon Waxman" alt="Click here to read We're Sorry For Making You Quit The &lt;em&gt;New York Times&lt;/em&gt;, Sharon Waxman" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/10/sharonwaxman.jpeg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Sharon Waxman is a former <a href="http://gawker.com/news/escape-from-l%27a%27/new-york-times-reporter-sharon-waxman-to-leave-hollywood-265247.php">NYT reporter</a> who quit the paper to go to LA and <a href="http://gawker.com/5002186/sharon-waxman-has-left-the-building">make her way </a>on the wild World Wide Web, which has "endlessly rich tools to pursue our craft," etc. She sent out an email today to her Trusted Friends and Colleagues telling them that <a href="http://gawker.com/5035543/every-print-diva-must-have-a-website">The Wrap News</a>, "which will have a fresh approach on reporting news in the entertainment industry" (!) and will be a "multi-platform source," etc., is all set to launch in January, and by the way please take a survey. And who will the world have to thank for Waxman's new "news and community resource for entertainment professionals?" Heartless Gawker, which made her quit her <em>real </em>job, allegedly!:				<a href="http://gawker.com/5060244/were-sorry-for-making-you-quit-the-new-york-times-sharon-waxman" title="Click here to read more about We're Sorry For Making You Quit The New York Times, Sharon Waxman">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5060244/were-sorry-for-making-you-quit-the-new-york-times-sharon-waxman]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5060244]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[sharon waxman]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Journalismism]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Bloggers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Reporters]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[The Wrap News]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:19:22 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5060244&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Emily Brill Will Not Allow You To Eat Yourself To Death]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Emily Brill Will Not Allow You To Eat Yourself To Death" href="http://gawker.com/emily-brill/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">emilybrill</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Emily Brill Will Not Allow You To Eat Yourself To Death" href="http://gawker.com/5054215/emily-brill-will-not-allow-you-to-eat-yourself-to-death" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Emily Brill Will Not Allow You To Eat Yourself To Death" alt="Click here to read Emily Brill Will Not Allow You To Eat Yourself To Death" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/09/emilybrill4.jpeg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Media heiress and <a href="http://gawker.com/5052453/emily-brill-will-not-go-gentle-into-that-good-night">urban prose stylist</a> Emily Brill used to be overweight, which is <a href="http://gawker.com/381582/emily-brill-ex+fattie-i-do-feel-like-a-cancer-survivor">worse than cancer</a>. She heroically <a href="http://gawker.com/5036629/mtv-seeks-ex+fatties-offends-emily-brill">slimmed down</a>, and is now compelled to weigh in, ha, on weighty public health issues. So when she saw a week-old <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/17/dining/17diet.html?ex=1379476800&en=26bd5ae7bb74c794&ei=5124&partner=permalink&exprod=permalink"><em>Times</em> story</a> about the decline of calorie-counting, she could not conscientiously keep quiet! "Mind if I add my two cents?" she <a href="http://www.essentiallyemily.com/?p=1087#more-1087">writes</a>. "I did manage to lose some weight over the past year or two..."				<a href="http://gawker.com/5054215/emily-brill-will-not-allow-you-to-eat-yourself-to-death" title="Click here to read more about Emily Brill Will Not Allow You To Eat Yourself To Death">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5054215/emily-brill-will-not-allow-you-to-eat-yourself-to-death]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5054215]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Emily brill]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Diets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Eating]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[workouts]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 24 Sep 2008 12:53:52 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5054215&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Dexter Filkins' War Story]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Dexter Filkins' War Story" href="http://gawker.com/dexter-filkins/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">dexterfilkins</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Dexter Filkins' War Story" href="http://gawker.com/5041083/dexter-filkins-war-story" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Dexter Filkins' War Story" alt="Click here to read Dexter Filkins' War Story" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/08/dexterfilkins.jpeg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Dexter Filkins spent four years covering the Iraq War for the <em>New York Times</em>. Today, the paper's magazine has an excerpt of his upcoming book, <em>The Forever War</em>. Filkins is a beautiful writer, which only serves to enhance the enormous sadness of his story. The piece pulses not with political outrage, but with weariness over a steady diet of death. After the jump, one small excerpt: Filkins tells how his desire for a photo of a dead insurgent ended with a Marine shot and killed:				<a href="http://gawker.com/5041083/dexter-filkins-war-story" title="Click here to read more about Dexter Filkins' War Story">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5041083/dexter-filkins-war-story]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5041083]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[dexter filkins]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Snark break]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Death]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Reporters]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 24 Aug 2008 16:11:22 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5041083&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Times Shamefully Downplays Importance Of Hipster Kickballers]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;Times&lt;/em&gt; Shamefully Downplays Importance Of Hipster Kickballers" href="http://gawker.com/hipster-kickball/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">hipsterkickball</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;Times&lt;/em&gt; Shamefully Downplays Importance Of Hipster Kickballers" href="http://gawker.com/5041063/times-shamefully-downplays-importance-of-hipster-kickballers" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;Times&lt;/em&gt; Shamefully Downplays Importance Of Hipster Kickballers" alt="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;Times&lt;/em&gt; Shamefully Downplays Importance Of Hipster Kickballers" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/08/hipsters2.jpeg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				It's about time that the paper of record started covering the happenings in McCarren park, the ragged dirt patch that is home to the <a href="http://gawker.com/search/hipster%20kickball/">Brooklyn Hipster Kickball League</a>, that den of sociological intrigue so ably chronicled by our own Sheila McClear. What with the<a href="http://gawker.com/393325/hipster-kickballer-arrested-for-brandishing-a-sword-in-macys"> legal drama</a> and <a href="http://gawker.com/393666/hipster-kickballer-distracted-by-missed-connection-cutie">fundamental instances of human love </a>associated with the hipster kickballers, it's no stretch to say that they are the demographic group most worthy of media coverage in NYC or anywhere else. But in <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/24/nyregion/thecity/24mcca.html">an article</a> today that is lightly reported to a comical degree, the <em>Times </em>attempts to deny the BHKL-ers their rightful place at the top of our minds!:				<a href="http://gawker.com/5041063/times-shamefully-downplays-importance-of-hipster-kickballers" title="Click here to read more about Times Shamefully Downplays Importance Of Hipster Kickballers">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5041063/times-shamefully-downplays-importance-of-hipster-kickballers]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5041063]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[hipster kickball]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Shut up, brooklyn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Hipsters]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[journalismism]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 24 Aug 2008 14:47:34 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5041063&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Allen Salkin Finds Trends Where Lesser Reporters See Only Bullshit]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Allen Salkin Finds Trends Where Lesser Reporters See Only Bullshit" href="http://gawker.com/allen-salkin/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">allensalkin</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Allen Salkin Finds Trends Where Lesser Reporters See Only Bullshit" href="http://gawker.com/5035634/allen-salkin-finds-trends-where-lesser-reporters-see-only-bullshit" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Allen Salkin Finds Trends Where Lesser Reporters See Only Bullshit" alt="Click here to read Allen Salkin Finds Trends Where Lesser Reporters See Only Bullshit" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/08/salkin.jpeg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Allen Salkin is the <em>Times</em>' designated kitschy trend specialist and author of <a href="http://gawker.com/news/setting-the-record-straight/everything-you-think-you-know-about-jessica-seinfeld-is-pretty-much-true-318817.php">a book about fake holiday Festivus</a>, which sums up his sensibility very well. When we last encountered him he was<a href="http://gawker.com/5027416/let-allen-salkin-fill-you-in-on-the-crazy-life-of-allen-salkin"> sending out email blasts </a>looking for travel companions to the Olympics, dinner companions to a barbecue joint, and sources for a story about ukeleles. You'll be happy to know that his aggressive pursuit of ukulele players has paid off! But you've tipped your hand, Salkin. <em>We're onto you</em>:				<a href="http://gawker.com/5035634/allen-salkin-finds-trends-where-lesser-reporters-see-only-bullshit" title="Click here to read more about Allen Salkin Finds Trends Where Lesser Reporters See Only Bullshit">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5035634/allen-salkin-finds-trends-where-lesser-reporters-see-only-bullshit]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5035634]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[allen salkin]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Journalismism]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Oversharers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[trendwatch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Ukeleles]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:28:59 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5035634&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Brazilian Lottery Mystery]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read The Brazilian Lottery Mystery" href="http://gawker.com/brazilian-lottery-winner/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">brazilianlotterywinner</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read The Brazilian Lottery Mystery" href="http://gawker.com/5032039/the-brazilian-lottery-mystery" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read The Brazilian Lottery Mystery" alt="Click here to read The Brazilian Lottery Mystery" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/08/monopoly.jpeg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Did you hear the rumor about the Brazilian lottery winner? Supposedly a Brazilian immigrant bought a winning $126 million lottery ticket in Newark, but couldn't cash it in because they were illegal, so they passed it on to somebody else, now rumors are flying from here to South America, and nobody knows who has it, but everybody is so obsessed with looking for it, the media on two different continents is on the case, but maybe the whole thing is false. It's all a product of the ease with which the world communicates in this digital age, as well as a powerful statement on immigrants yearning for the American dream. One new clue is this actual sentence from a <a href="http://www.kktv.com/news/headlines/26176494.html">KKTV story</a> about the Montauk Monster: "According to the Huffington Post, Gawker has raking in eleven billion page views since the picture came out Tuesday." So aren't we all really "lottery winners," in a way? [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/01/nyregion/01jackpot.html?ref=nyregion">NYT</a>]				<a href="http://gawker.com/5032039/the-brazilian-lottery-mystery" title="Click here to read more about The Brazilian Lottery Mystery">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5032039/the-brazilian-lottery-mystery]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5032039]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Brazilian Lottery Winner]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Good Luck With Your Lottery Demons]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Convoluted Things]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Mysteries]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 01 Aug 2008 12:52:11 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5032039&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Vicious Cycle Of Publicity Stunts]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read The Vicious Cycle Of Publicity Stunts" href="http://gawker.com/advertising/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">advertising</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read The Vicious Cycle Of Publicity Stunts" href="http://gawker.com/5031908/the-vicious-cycle-of-publicity-stunts" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read The Vicious Cycle Of Publicity Stunts" alt="Click here to read The Vicious Cycle Of Publicity Stunts" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/08/wonderbra.jpeg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Summer is not just an excruciatingly slow time of year for actual news; it's also an excruciatingly slow time for manufactured news. It's not like ad agencies can just <a href="http://gawker.com/367138/wow-quick">riff </a>off all the interesting<a href="http://gawker.com/370671/ad-people-see-potential-in-this-whole-spitzer-affair"> scandals </a>in the news, when there <em>are </em>no scandals in the news. What does that mean for you, the consumer? A shitload of <a href="http://gawker.com/tag/publicity-stunts/">publicity stunts</a>, in which advertisers try to create some interest out of nothing. What does that mean for advertising reporters? Stories about these very stunts—sometimes even a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/01/business/media/01adco.html?ref=business">trend story</a>, to give the appearance of being something more than just a roundup of items from <a href="http://adrants.com/">Adrants</a>. See, the system works! Although that doesn't mean any of these stunts are necessarily <em>good</em>: 				<a href="http://gawker.com/5031908/the-vicious-cycle-of-publicity-stunts" title="Click here to read more about The Vicious Cycle Of Publicity Stunts">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5031908/the-vicious-cycle-of-publicity-stunts]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5031908]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Publicity Stunts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Summertime]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[trendwatch]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:26:33 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5031908&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[David Carr Potato Metaphor Scandal!]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read David Carr Potato Metaphor Scandal!" href="http://gawker.com/david-carr/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">davidcarr</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read David Carr Potato Metaphor Scandal!" href="http://gawker.com/5028225/david-carr-potato-metaphor-scandal" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read David Carr Potato Metaphor Scandal!" alt="Click here to read David Carr Potato Metaphor Scandal!" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/07/davidcarr.jpeg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<a href="http://gawker.com/5026569/times-reporter-i-was-a-fat-thug-who-beat-up-women-and-sold-bad-coke">Crackhead-</a>turned <em>Times </em>reporter success story David Carr is loved by media types for being a cool guy, and is basking in the generally positive public attitude towards his <a href="http://gawker.com/5027026/doing-crack-with-david-carr">upcoming memoir</a>. But everything is not well in Carr's world. Oh no. Just as Carr has found the strength to open up to the world about his past drug use, an even bigger scandal threatens to <em>overwhelm</em> him: his incurable fondness for potatoes. 				<a href="http://gawker.com/5028225/david-carr-potato-metaphor-scandal" title="Click here to read more about David Carr Potato Metaphor Scandal!">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5028225/david-carr-potato-metaphor-scandal]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5028225]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[David Carr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[It seemed like fun at first]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Addiction]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[david blum]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[journalismism]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Metaphors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[NY Press]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Potatoes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Reporters]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Scandals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:09:39 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5028225&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[T Magazine Makes Will Ferrell Stop Clowning Around]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;T&lt;/em&gt; Magazine Makes Will Ferrell Stop Clowning Around" href="http://gawker.com/t-magazine/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">tmagazine</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;T&lt;/em&gt; Magazine Makes Will Ferrell Stop Clowning Around" href="http://gawker.com/5027485/t-magazine-makes-will-ferrell-stop-clowning-around" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;T&lt;/em&gt; Magazine Makes Will Ferrell Stop Clowning Around" alt="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;T&lt;/em&gt; Magazine Makes Will Ferrell Stop Clowning Around" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/07/willferrell.jpeg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Oh, <em>New York Times </em>"<em>T</em>" fashion magazine: we will never understand you. We know the glossy mag brings in a ton of advertising dollars for the paper. But beyond that, its editorial mission is too rarefied for us to grasp. There's the odd <a href="http://gawker.com/365935/indie-rockers-as-fashion-icons">indie rock fashion spread</a> or <a href="http://gawker.com/5005955/t-wouldnt-miss-standards-editor">child porn dustup</a>, but <em>what for</em>? Today we were informed by a marketing person that the magazine has launched a series of celebrity "screen test" videos on <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/indexes/2008/06/19/style/t/index.html">its website</a>. As far as we can tell, they're the first people to succeed in editing a five-minute long Will Ferrell interview in such a way that it is <em>not funny at all</em>. Beyond that, we're not sure what they were trying to accomplish. Watch the clip below, and take your own guess:				<a href="http://gawker.com/5027485/t-magazine-makes-will-ferrell-stop-clowning-around" title="Click here to read more about T Magazine Makes Will Ferrell Stop Clowning Around">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5027485/t-magazine-makes-will-ferrell-stop-clowning-around]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5027485]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[T Magazine]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Celebrity science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Celebrities]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Comedians]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Mystifying things]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Will Ferrell]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:19:02 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5027485&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Let Allen Salkin Fill You In On The Crazy Life Of Allen Salkin]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Let Allen Salkin Fill You In On The Crazy Life Of Allen Salkin" href="http://gawker.com/allen-salkin/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">allensalkin</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Let Allen Salkin Fill You In On The Crazy Life Of Allen Salkin" href="http://gawker.com/5027416/let-allen-salkin-fill-you-in-on-the-crazy-life-of-allen-salkin" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Let Allen Salkin Fill You In On The Crazy Life Of Allen Salkin" alt="Click here to read Let Allen Salkin Fill You In On The Crazy Life Of Allen Salkin" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/07/allensalkin2.jpeg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Look, we have another entrant to the <a href="http://gawker.com/378892/the-compulsive-oversharers-of-the-internet-a-field-guide">oversharers hall of fame</a>! This guy doesn't <a href="http://gawker.com/5011281/worst-overshare-anywhere-ever">post pictures of cum on his face</a>, or go on and on about his <a href="http://gawker.com/news/the-sins-of-the-fathers/elijah-pollack-is-going-to-be-a-horror-304568.php">four-year-old's cheese preferences</a>. But considering that this man is a reporter for the <em>New York Times</em>, we're going to hold him to a slightly higher standard. Anyhow, is everyone in for the barbecue excursion next week with Allen Salkin?				<a href="http://gawker.com/5027416/let-allen-salkin-fill-you-in-on-the-crazy-life-of-allen-salkin" title="Click here to read more about Let Allen Salkin Fill You In On The Crazy Life Of Allen Salkin">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5027416/let-allen-salkin-fill-you-in-on-the-crazy-life-of-allen-salkin]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5027416]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[allen salkin]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Oversharers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Barbecue]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Reporters]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:49:50 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5027416&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Consumers Bored With This Whole 'Save The Earth' Thing]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Consumers Bored With This Whole 'Save The Earth' Thing" href="http://gawker.com/advertising/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">advertising</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Consumers Bored With This Whole 'Save The Earth' Thing" href="http://gawker.com/5026635/consumers-bored-with-this-whole-save-the-earth-thing" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Consumers Bored With This Whole 'Save The Earth' Thing" alt="Click here to read Consumers Bored With This Whole 'Save The Earth' Thing" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/07/greenad250.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Well, it's been a year or two since the corporate world started its "green" advertising revolution, and it's worked. The problem is solved! The problem being the fickle consumer's desire to hear companies talk about how "green" they are. “After 18 months, levels of concern on any issue tend to drop off,” <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/18/business/media/18adco.html?_r=1&ref=business&oref=slogin">explains</a> one marketing wizard. Now we can all sit back and feel good about what we've accomplished! The earth is still destined for environmental ruin, but at least we'll be subjected to less marketing bastardization like this:				<a href="http://gawker.com/5026635/consumers-bored-with-this-whole-save-the-earth-thing" title="Click here to read more about Consumers Bored With This Whole 'Save The Earth' Thing">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5026635/consumers-bored-with-this-whole-save-the-earth-thing]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5026635]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Autos]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[corporate america]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Environmentalism]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Flackery]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 18 Jul 2008 09:42:45 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5026635&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Iran Gets 33% Scarier With Photoshop Retouching]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Iran Gets 33% Scarier With Photoshop Retouching" href="http://gawker.com/photoshop/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">photoshop</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Iran Gets 33% Scarier With Photoshop Retouching" href="http://gawker.com/5023846/iran-gets-33-scarier-with-photoshop-retouching" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Iran Gets 33% Scarier With Photoshop Retouching" alt="Click here to read Iran Gets 33% Scarier With Photoshop Retouching" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/07/ae/d2/aed2d0e1ce048d27225f60af596794df.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Iran has tested missiles! Not just one or two or even three missiles, but four missiles! Our crack intelligence agencies know this, because the Iranian military's propaganda arm helpfully provided the media with a photo showing—count 'em—<em>four whole missiles</em> blasting off into the sky. You'll regret the decision to build only three missile shelters, Israel! The scary, quadri-missiled photo of terror was splashed across front pages nationwide. Too bad it's a big phony!				<a href="http://gawker.com/5023846/iran-gets-33-scarier-with-photoshop-retouching" title="Click here to read more about Iran Gets 33% Scarier With Photoshop Retouching">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5023846/iran-gets-33-scarier-with-photoshop-retouching]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5023846]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Photoshop]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Hoaxes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fakes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Missiles]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Weapons]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:41:46 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5023846&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Fox News Plays Nice With Times Reporters It Hasn't Yet Smeared]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Fox News Plays Nice With &lt;em&gt;Times&lt;/em&gt; Reporters It Hasn't Yet Smeared" href="http://gawker.com/fox-news/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">foxnews</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Fox News Plays Nice With &lt;em&gt;Times&lt;/em&gt; Reporters It Hasn't Yet Smeared" href="http://gawker.com/5023425/fox-news-plays-nice-with-times-reporters-it-hasnt-yet-smeared" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Fox News Plays Nice With &lt;em&gt;Times&lt;/em&gt; Reporters It Hasn't Yet Smeared" alt="Click here to read Fox News Plays Nice With &lt;em&gt;Times&lt;/em&gt; Reporters It Hasn't Yet Smeared" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/07/e7/dd/e7dd3db9955fc6bb67b120a68a94577f.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Is the Fox News PR machine trying to get back in the good graces of the <em>New York Times</em>—and slyly drive a wedge between reporters there at the same time? The network's <a href="http://gawker.com/tag/irena-briganti/?i=5022962&t=the-case-against-crazy-irena-briganti-from-those-who-know-her-best">famously vicious</a> media relations operation was ravaged in a David Carr <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/07/business/media/07carr.html?ref=business">column</a> in the <em>Times</em> on Monday. But now that they've let Bill O'Reilly take his<a href="http://gawker.com/tag/bill-o.reilly/?i=5022815&t=bill-oreilly-falsely-accuses-times-of-caricature"> obligatory on-air shot</a> at the paper, the network seems to have decided to play nice with <em>Times</em> reporters—at least, with some of them.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5023425/fox-news-plays-nice-with-times-reporters-it-hasnt-yet-smeared" title="Click here to read more about Fox News Plays Nice With Times Reporters It Hasn't Yet Smeared">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5023425/fox-news-plays-nice-with-times-reporters-it-hasnt-yet-smeared]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5023425]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Public relations]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[David Carr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Flackery]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Jacques Steinberg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Reporters]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 09 Jul 2008 13:40:07 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5023425&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch Inspires Yet Another Evil Mogul]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Rupert Murdoch Inspires Yet Another Evil Mogul" href="http://gawker.com/books/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">books</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Rupert Murdoch Inspires Yet Another Evil Mogul" href="http://gawker.com/5021806/rupert-murdoch-inspires-yet-another-evil-mogul" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Rupert Murdoch Inspires Yet Another Evil Mogul" alt="Click here to read Rupert Murdoch Inspires Yet Another Evil Mogul" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/07/a8/e3/a8e3a1236db3cf8050e132bbf5ac9c66.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				A <em>deliciously bitter</em> ex-NYT reporter named <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged JOHN DARNTON" title="Click here to read more posts tagged JOHN DARNTON" href="http://gawker.com/tag/John-Darnton/">John Darnton</a>, who worked at the paper for more than 30 years, has a book coming out called <em><a href="http://www.randomhouse.com/catalog/display.pperl/9780307267528.html">Black and White and Dead All Over</a></em>, which is murder mystery set at a thinly veiled version of the <em>Times</em>. The terribly-titled (but maybe well-written!) volume features a bunch of <a href="http://www.portfolio.com/views/blogs/mixed-media/2008/07/02/ny-times-editor-murdered-in-fiction">obvious allusions </a>to real <em>Times</em> people, including a standards editor who gets murdered (take that, standards). Droopy-faced News Corp. overlord <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged RUPERT MURDOCH" title="Click here to read more posts tagged RUPERT MURDOCH" href="http://gawker.com/tag/rupert-murdoch/">Rupert Murdoch</a> figures prominently as an ominous character named "Lester Moloch." But this isn't the first time Murdoch has been flogged in fictional works. Oh no!				<a href="http://gawker.com/5021806/rupert-murdoch-inspires-yet-another-evil-mogul" title="Click here to read more about Rupert Murdoch Inspires Yet Another Evil Mogul">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5021806/rupert-murdoch-inspires-yet-another-evil-mogul]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5021806]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[John Darnton]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Listicles]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Moguls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 03 Jul 2008 09:49:39 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5021806&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Times Incorrectly Portrays Bonnie Fuller As Sympathetic Figure]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;Times&lt;/em&gt; Incorrectly Portrays Bonnie Fuller As Sympathetic Figure" href="http://gawker.com/bonnie-fuller/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">bonniefuller</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;Times&lt;/em&gt; Incorrectly Portrays Bonnie Fuller As Sympathetic Figure" href="http://gawker.com/397458/times-incorrectly-portrays-bonnie-fuller-as-sympathetic-figure" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;Times&lt;/em&gt; Incorrectly Portrays Bonnie Fuller As Sympathetic Figure" alt="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;Times&lt;/em&gt; Incorrectly Portrays Bonnie Fuller As Sympathetic Figure" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/06/small_bonniefuller-thumb.jpeg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<a href="http://gawker.com/assets/resources/2008/06/bonniefuller.jpeg"></a>For unclear reasons, the <em>Times </em>felt compelled to hand a huge chunk of its Sunday Business section over to a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/29/business/media/29bonnie.html?pagewanted=1&sq=bonnie%20fuller&st=cse&scp=1">profile</a> of Bonnie Fuller&mdash;the woman most responsible for creating our nation's soul-destroying cast of powerful celebrity magazines&mdash;<a href="http://gawker.com/tag/breaking/?i=5008884&t=the-witch-is-dead">who was recently axed </a>from her multimillion-dollar gig as editorial chief of American Media. A sympathetic profile! The news peg, purportedly: Bonnie Fuller is doing some vague new project on the internet. For women! With specifics to be determined! Color us skeptical. The Fuller that the <em>Times </em>describes does not sound like the woman who was so despised by her assistants that they <a href="http://gawker.com/tag/editors-from-hell/?i=5009037&t=bullied-assistant-put-snot-in-bonnie-fullers-mini-souffl">put snot in her food</a>. What's the major malfunction here?				<a href="http://gawker.com/397458/times-incorrectly-portrays-bonnie-fuller-as-sympathetic-figure" title="Click here to read more about Times Incorrectly Portrays Bonnie Fuller As Sympathetic Figure">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/397458/times-incorrectly-portrays-bonnie-fuller-as-sympathetic-figure]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-397458]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Bonnie Fuller]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Corrections]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Celebrities]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[celebrity magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Corrections]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[David Carr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[journalismism]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Mistakes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Self Awareness]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:38:15 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=397458&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Doctors On YouTube May Be Shadier Than They Appear]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Doctors On YouTube May Be Shadier Than They Appear" href="http://gawker.com/youtube/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">youtube</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Doctors On YouTube May Be Shadier Than They Appear" href="http://gawker.com/5019883/doctors-on-youtube-may-be-shadier-than-they-appear" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Doctors On YouTube May Be Shadier Than They Appear" alt="Click here to read Doctors On YouTube May Be Shadier Than They Appear" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/06/64/10/64107fec7d5e7f75513f43928f8d36f4.jpg"/>
						<span class="play_icon"></span>					</a></div>
									</div>
				If you ever selected a plastic surgeon or LASIK doctor based on a random YouTube video, it's probably apt that that video only happened as a result of an under-the-table payment and the doctor was really incompetent and now you walk around blind and ugly. But what about the victims of the future? Plenty of doctors have gone right ahead and offered patients rebates or huge discounts in exchange for <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/26/fashion/26SKIN.html?pagewanted=1&ref=fashion">posting glowing videos</a> about their procedures online, although something like that would be patently unethical in the "regular" media. Docs are like, "Huh, rules, really? I just thought it would be nice!" Patients are like, "Sweet, cheap surgery!" The loser is you, the affluent, narcissistic consumer. A couple of typical videos are after the jump; just because "a famous celebrity (name undisclosed for privacy)" gets LASIK from Dr. Feinerman doesn't mean you have to, too:				<a href="http://gawker.com/5019883/doctors-on-youtube-may-be-shadier-than-they-appear" title="Click here to read more about Doctors On YouTube May Be Shadier Than They Appear">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5019883/doctors-on-youtube-may-be-shadier-than-they-appear]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5019883]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Beauty]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Botox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[doctors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Surgery]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:06:24 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5019883&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Mad? Buy Things!]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Mad? Buy Things!" href="http://gawker.com/advertising/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">advertising</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Mad? Buy Things!" href="http://gawker.com/5019842/mad-buy-things" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Mad? Buy Things!" alt="Click here to read Mad? Buy Things!" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/06/f3/24/f32402416db880fe18d4f8a12aee9768.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				People today: they're all angry! There's taxes, politics—hell, the little man is getting screwed left and right! Corporate America understands and empathizes with your anger, and would like to encourage you to channel it into the constructive area of commerce. “On some fundamental level everyone’s sick of everything, economically, politically,” <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/26/business/media/26adco.html?pagewanted=2&ref=business">says </a>one ad agency exec. Fortunately, skilled advertisers are able to take this vague and unsubstantiated insight into your psyche and put it to use by making just the type of ads that you want to see: angry ones! Just look:				<a href="http://gawker.com/5019842/mad-buy-things" title="Click here to read more about Mad? Buy Things!">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5019842/mad-buy-things]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5019842]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Anger]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[corporate america]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 26 Jun 2008 09:26:56 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5019842&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA["Our descendants may look at us and say, 'God, these were the most gullible people who ever lived.'"]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read &quot;Our descendants may look at us and say, 'God, these were the most gullible people who ever lived.'&quot;" href="http://gawker.com/advertising/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">advertising</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read &quot;Our descendants may look at us and say, 'God, these were the most gullible people who ever lived.'&quot;" href="http://gawker.com/5018768/our-descendants-may-look-at-us-and-say-god-these-were-the-most-gullible-people-who-ever-lived" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read &quot;Our descendants may look at us and say, 'God, these were the most gullible people who ever lived.'&quot;" alt="Click here to read &quot;Our descendants may look at us and say, 'God, these were the most gullible people who ever lived.'&quot;" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/06/42/62/small_4262cbaf2f9e0ae8cb67cc56c3a4637f.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Celebrities: they're in ads! That's because celebrities tend to sell stuff to people, according to the <em>New York Times</em>, which broke this story wide open with an <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/22/business/media/22celeb.html?pagewanted=1&ref=media&adxnnlx=1214226124-wSORfPT6x%20HGFZFbFjEKBw">epic piece in yesterday's paper</a>. There are three clear points that you, the educated consumer, must understand: Companies are run by starry-eyed celebrity hound white guys who will pay any price to hang out with a cool rapper or have their umbrella endorsed by Rihanna; many celebrities are themselves sheep, convinced that their endorsement deal is a meaningful attempt by a corporation to plumb the depths of their soul (it's really not! surprisingly); and finally, all of this is the fault of dirty gossip websites just like this one!				<a href="http://gawker.com/5018768/our-descendants-may-look-at-us-and-say-god-these-were-the-most-gullible-people-who-ever-lived" title="Click here to read more about "Our descendants may look at us and say, 'God, these were the most gullible people who ever lived.'"">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5018768/our-descendants-may-look-at-us-and-say-god-these-were-the-most-gullible-people-who-ever-lived]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5018768]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Celebrities]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Celebvertising]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Consumerist]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Ellen Degeneres]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gossip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Investigations]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Jay-Z]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Pimps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Puffy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rihanna]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Websites]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 23 Jun 2008 09:37:23 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5018768&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Are Consumers Ready For A Cartoon Edgier Than Charlie Brown?]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Are Consumers Ready For A Cartoon Edgier Than &lt;em&gt;Charlie Brown&lt;/em&gt;?" href="http://gawker.com/family-guy/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">familyguy</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Are Consumers Ready For A Cartoon Edgier Than &lt;em&gt;Charlie Brown&lt;/em&gt;?" href="http://gawker.com/5017523/are-consumers-ready-for-a-cartoon-edgier-than-charlie-brown" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Are Consumers Ready For A Cartoon Edgier Than &lt;em&gt;Charlie Brown&lt;/em&gt;?" alt="Click here to read Are Consumers Ready For A Cartoon Edgier Than &lt;em&gt;Charlie Brown&lt;/em&gt;?" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/06/57/eb/small_57eb9e5f1305e5573eae6436029f61f9.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Is it a mark of progress that our national ads can now feature characters that are far more foul-mouthed and offensive to white bread America than in times past? I'm inclined to say yes. The <em>Times</em> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/18/business/media/18adco.html?ref=business">considers </a>the rise of <em>Family Guy</em> characters as beloved ad icons, even for wholesome brands like Coke and Subway. But hey, sometimes they say things on that show that are funny! Times are changing, you see, and these cartoon characters are just acceptable enough to squeeze into the mainstream under the rubric of "edgy." Since this is a hugely popular TV show on the Fox Network that is just the next in a long line of "edgy" cultural moments, you could correctly call this an antiquated discussion (even for the olds). The real question is: will Americans stand for a fat, ignorant cartoon father telling them how to eat their meat?				<a href="http://gawker.com/5017523/are-consumers-ready-for-a-cartoon-edgier-than-charlie-brown" title="Click here to read more about Are Consumers Ready For A Cartoon Edgier Than Charlie Brown?">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5017523/are-consumers-ready-for-a-cartoon-edgier-than-charlie-brown]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5017523]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Family Guy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Cartoons]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Edginess]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Old Ideas]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:31:43 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5017523&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[How Not To Charm A Restaurant Critic]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read How Not To Charm A Restaurant Critic" href="http://gawker.com/frank-bruni/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">frankbruni</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read How Not To Charm A Restaurant Critic" href="http://gawker.com/395856/how-not-to-charm-a-restaurant-critic" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read How Not To Charm A Restaurant Critic" alt="Click here to read How Not To Charm A Restaurant Critic" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/06/small_frankbruni-thumb.jpeg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<a href="http://gawker.com/assets/resources/2008/06/frankbruni.jpeg"></a>Frank Bruni is pissed! The <em>New York Times'</em> omnipotent restaurant critic (pictured) today reviews a new Tribeca restaurant named Ago, which is owned in part by actor Robert De Niro. And Bruni's experience there is proof for the entire restaurant business that no matter how popular, expensive, or exclusive your place is, it is still quite possible to receive a terrible review <em>if you act like an idiot.</em> Please: Learn some lessons from Ago's fiasco. Here is what <strong>not</strong> to do when your restaurant is being reviewed: 				<a href="http://gawker.com/395856/how-not-to-charm-a-restaurant-critic" title="Click here to read more about How Not To Charm A Restaurant Critic">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/395856/how-not-to-charm-a-restaurant-critic]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-395856]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Frank Bruni]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Not afraid to be servicey]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Ago]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Ago Restaurant]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Critics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[How-to]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Listicles]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Mistakes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[not afraid to be servicey]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Restaurant]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:51:38 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=395856&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Times Rips Off Yet Another WSJ Story Idea]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;Times&lt;/em&gt; Rips Off Yet Another &lt;em&gt;WSJ&lt;/em&gt; Story Idea" href="http://gawker.com/this-thing-is-like-that-thing/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">thisthingislikethatthing</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;Times&lt;/em&gt; Rips Off Yet Another &lt;em&gt;WSJ&lt;/em&gt; Story Idea" href="http://gawker.com/395175/times-rips-off-yet-another-wsj-story-idea" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;Times&lt;/em&gt; Rips Off Yet Another &lt;em&gt;WSJ&lt;/em&gt; Story Idea" alt="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;Times&lt;/em&gt; Rips Off Yet Another &lt;em&gt;WSJ&lt;/em&gt; Story Idea" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/06/small_nytrip-thumb.jpeg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<a href="http://gawker.com/assets/resources/2008/06/nytrip.jpeg"></a>Does the <em>New York Times</em> have an intern who just reads copies of the <em>Wall Street Journal</em> from last year and suggests <a href="http://gawker.com/tag/rewrites/?i=393759&t=times-miracle-fruit-story-is-a-ripoff-of-last-years-wsj-article">story ideas to steal</a>? Has our <a href="http://gawker.com/tag/how-things-work/?i=394822&t=the-complete-guide-to-stealing-news-stories">explanation of the rules for stealing news stories </a>legitimately had no impact on <em>Times </em>whatsoever? (No). Yesterday Anemona Hartocollis wrote a story for the <em>Times</em> about family-style therapy, largely focusing on the work of a Beth Israel treatment center. That's....<em>been done</em>:				<a href="http://gawker.com/395175/times-rips-off-yet-another-wsj-story-idea" title="Click here to read more about Times Rips Off Yet Another WSJ Story Idea">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/395175/times-rips-off-yet-another-wsj-story-idea]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-395175]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[this thing is like that thing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Breaking the rules]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[journalismism]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rewrites]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Ripoffs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Theft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wsj]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 05 Jun 2008 15:24:53 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=395175&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Wal-Mart PR Machine Plays Well With Others]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read The Wal-Mart PR Machine Plays Well With Others" href="http://gawker.com/public-relations/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">publicrelations</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read The Wal-Mart PR Machine Plays Well With Others" href="http://gawker.com/395089/the-wal+mart-pr-machine-plays-well-with-others" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read The Wal-Mart PR Machine Plays Well With Others" alt="Click here to read The Wal-Mart PR Machine Plays Well With Others" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/06/small_wmbad2-thumb.jpeg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<a href="http://gawker.com/assets/resources/2008/06/wmbad2.jpeg"></a>Back in 2005, two activist groups&mdash;Wake Up Wal-Mart and Wal-Mart Watch&mdash;launched campaigns to kick Wal-Mart's ass in the media. Which they did quite successfully for a while. The soulless retailer spent untold millions on a huge, political-style PR campaign <a href="http://gawker.com/tag/rejoinder/?i=356731&t=edelman-is-a-soulless-wal+mart-shilling-firm-that-shouldnt-lecture-about-ethics">from our friends at Edelman </a>to fight back against the criticisms of them for everything from poor health care to union busting. But the <em>Times </em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/05/business/05walmart.html?ref=business">reports today</a> that Edelman's Wal-Mart <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/04/02/070402fa_fact_goldberg?currentPage=1">war room </a>shut down months ago, and the torrent of news stories about the company's flaws has died down. Why? Because Wal-Mart has adopted a philosophy of working with critics, and made their enemies their friends. This is either evidence of progress, or cause for despair. Since the company is still a horrible union buster, we'll go with "despair." 				<a href="http://gawker.com/395089/the-wal+mart-pr-machine-plays-well-with-others" title="Click here to read more about The Wal-Mart PR Machine Plays Well With Others">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/395089/the-wal+mart-pr-machine-plays-well-with-others]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-395089]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Public Relations]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[corporate america]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Edelman]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Flackery]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Retailing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Spin]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wal-Mart]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 05 Jun 2008 10:30:05 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=395089&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New Yorker Accused Of Ripping Off Sleazeball Profile]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;New Yorker&lt;/em&gt; Accused Of Ripping Off Sleazeball Profile" href="http://gawker.com/plagiarism%3f/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">plagiarism?</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;New Yorker&lt;/em&gt; Accused Of Ripping Off Sleazeball Profile" href="http://gawker.com/394985/new-yorker-accused-of-ripping-off-sleazeball-profile" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;New Yorker&lt;/em&gt; Accused Of Ripping Off Sleazeball Profile" alt="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;New Yorker&lt;/em&gt; Accused Of Ripping Off Sleazeball Profile" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/06/small_rogerstone2-thumb.jpeg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<a href="http://gawker.com/assets/resources/2008/06/rogerstone2.jpeg"></a>Now that the <a href="http://gawker.com/tag/how-things-work/?i=394822&t=the-complete-guide-to-stealing-news-stories">rules for stealing news stories </a>have been revealed, people are seeing stolen stories everywhere! At the <em>National Review</em>, they're <a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NTkyYjA2NmMyZTU3NzM5ZDY5YjZiMzYwZWEwMTgxMzc">accusing</a> the<em> New Yorker</em>'s Jeff Toobin of ripping off the <em>Weekly Standard</em>'s profile last year of Nixon-loving political hit man <a href="http://gawker.com/tag/roger-stone/">Roger Stone</a>. We guess that's true, if you consider it plagiarism to quote the well-rehearsed quotes of a veteran quote whore:				<a href="http://gawker.com/394985/new-yorker-accused-of-ripping-off-sleazeball-profile" title="Click here to read more about New Yorker Accused Of Ripping Off Sleazeball Profile">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/394985/new-yorker-accused-of-ripping-off-sleazeball-profile]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-394985]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[plagiarism?]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[journalismism]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[New Yorker]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Ripoffs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[roger stone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Stealing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Weekly Standard]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:30:07 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=394985&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Billionaire Financial Firms Losing PR Battle To The Poors]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Billionaire Financial Firms Losing PR Battle To The Poors" href="http://gawker.com/public-relations/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">publicrelations</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Billionaire Financial Firms Losing PR Battle To The Poors" href="http://gawker.com/394922/billionaire-financial-firms-losing-pr-battle-to-the-poors" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Billionaire Financial Firms Losing PR Battle To The Poors" alt="Click here to read Billionaire Financial Firms Losing PR Battle To The Poors" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/06/small_seiu-thumb.jpeg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<a href="http://gawker.com/assets/resources/2008/06/seiu.jpeg"></a>Super-rich guys who work in private equity may be the masters of the universe, but it's remarkably easy to get under their skin. All it takes is some crappy "street theater" mocking them as mean, heartless wealthy elites, and they run back into their corner offices and cry into their monogrammed handkerchiefs. The huge union SEIU has, for the last year, been staging little theatrical protests of the private equity industry's greed, featuring puppets and megaphones and whatnot. Which you would think would be as effective as sitting across the street from the White House with a "No Nukes" sign. But it really gets the rich guys worked up! Now the SEIU is <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/04/business/worldbusiness/04union.html?_r=1&ref=business&oref=slogin">taking their campaign international</a>, with help from grumpy comedian Lewis Black, and it's making the titans of finance so upset they want to run out and buy the Kleenex Corporation. It's not fair!				<a href="http://gawker.com/394922/billionaire-financial-firms-losing-pr-battle-to-the-poors" title="Click here to read more about Billionaire Financial Firms Losing PR Battle To The Poors">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/394922/billionaire-financial-firms-losing-pr-battle-to-the-poors]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-394922]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Public Relations]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Comedians]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[conflicts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Lewis Black]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[private equity]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Propaganda]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 04 Jun 2008 09:35:06 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=394922&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Complete Guide To Stealing News Stories]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read The Complete Guide To Stealing News Stories" href="http://gawker.com/how-things-work/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">howthingswork</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read The Complete Guide To Stealing News Stories" href="http://gawker.com/394822/the-complete-guide-to-stealing-news-stories" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read The Complete Guide To Stealing News Stories" alt="Click here to read The Complete Guide To Stealing News Stories" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/06/small_robber-thumb.jpeg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<a href="http://gawker.com/assets/resources/2008/06/robber.jpeg"></a>The media has lots of unwritten rules. Many of them are followed more closely than the written rules. After the <em>Times</em> <a href="http://gawker.com/tag/rewrites/?i=393759&t=times-miracle-fruit-story-is-a-ripoff-of-last-years-wsj-article">ripped off a year-old <em>Wall Street Journal</em> story with no credit last week</a>, we realized the need for a complete explanation of the powerful rules governing a time-honored and fundamental practice: Stealing stories. Every media outlet in the world does it&mdash;after all, there's much more space to fill every day than there are exclusives. Done the right way, it's perfectly acceptable; done the wrong way, it can be the start of an undercover war. After the jump, we explain everything you need to know to be an honorable, thieving hack. Memorize it:  				<a href="http://gawker.com/394822/the-complete-guide-to-stealing-news-stories" title="Click here to read more about The Complete Guide To Stealing News Stories">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/394822/the-complete-guide-to-stealing-news-stories]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-394822]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[how things work]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[journalismism]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Theft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[this thing is like that thing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wsj]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Jun 2008 14:26:33 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=394822&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New 'Green' Cable Network Lets You Save The World By Watching]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read New 'Green' Cable Network Lets You Save The World By Watching" href="http://gawker.com/media/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">media</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read New 'Green' Cable Network Lets You Save The World By Watching" href="http://gawker.com/394549/new-green-cable-network-lets-you-save-the-world-by-watching" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read New 'Green' Cable Network Lets You Save The World By Watching" alt="Click here to read New 'Green' Cable Network Lets You Save The World By Watching" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/06/small_green-thumb.jpeg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<a href="http://gawker.com/assets/resources/2008/06/green.jpeg"></a>Discovery is launching a new cable network called "Planet Green" that will offer round-the-clock "green" programming. The standard assumption is that his network signals a further mainstreaming of environmentalism, and therefore will somehow be good for the environment. This assumption is incorrect. Rather, it signals that environmentalism&mdash;a brand of activism that actually means something&mdash;has been transformed into "green," a vague lifestyle term that means nothing. What revolutionary do-good messengers will Planet Green bring to the public? General Motors, Tommy Lee, and "earth-conscious celebrities":				<a href="http://gawker.com/394549/new-green-cable-network-lets-you-save-the-world-by-watching" title="Click here to read more about New 'Green' Cable Network Lets You Save The World By Watching">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/394549/new-green-cable-network-lets-you-save-the-world-by-watching]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-394549]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Cable]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Environmentalism]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Meaningless things]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Planet Earth]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 02 Jun 2008 11:03:39 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=394549&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Also, Some Of Their Best Friends Are Black]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Also, Some Of Their Best Friends Are Black" href="http://gawker.com/media/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">media</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Also, Some Of Their Best Friends Are Black" href="http://gawker.com/394311/also-some-of-their-best-friends-are-black" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Also, Some Of Their Best Friends Are Black" alt="Click here to read Also, Some Of Their Best Friends Are Black" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/05/small_bike-thumb.jpeg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<a href="http://gawker.com/assets/resources/2008/05/bike.jpeg"></a>After commenters attacked the <em>Times</em>' Jennifer 8. Lee for her rather asinine, haughty story questioning how convenient bicycle commuting really is, her editor stepped in to defend her: "Readers, Since some of you seem to be seeking disclosures... Jennifer 8. Lee, a native New Yorker, has never owned a car. Nor do most writers and editors on the blog's staff. Indeed, several of us are avid cyclists." Proving cyclists can write dumb articles about cycling, too. [<a href="http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/05/29/some-reasons-the-bike-always-wins/">City Room </a>via <a href="http://animalnewyork.com/news/2008/05/cityroom-pisses-off-cyclists-r.php">Animal NY</a>]				<a href="http://gawker.com/394311/also-some-of-their-best-friends-are-black" title="Click here to read more about Also, Some Of Their Best Friends Are Black">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/394311/also-some-of-their-best-friends-are-black]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-394311]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Bicycles]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 30 May 2008 14:24:35 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=394311&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Hey! Edit This!]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Hey! Edit &lt;i&gt;This&lt;/i&gt;!" href="http://gawker.com/how-things-work/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">howthingswork</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Hey! Edit &lt;i&gt;This&lt;/i&gt;!" href="http://gawker.com/394056/hey-edit-this" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Hey! Edit &lt;i&gt;This&lt;/i&gt;!" alt="Click here to read Hey! Edit &lt;i&gt;This&lt;/i&gt;!" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/05/small_editing.png"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Do you ever feel that your editor is making a mockery out of your work? Sometimes they just don't understand. The Raleigh <a href="http://blogs.newsobserver.com/zane/index.php?title=the_art_of_editing&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1">News &  Observer</a> sends up an imagined editing of a recent <i>NYT</i> story. [<b>Which NYT story? Specify!</b>]				<a href="http://gawker.com/394056/hey-edit-this" title="Click here to read more about Hey! Edit This!">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/394056/hey-edit-this]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-394056]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[how things work]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA['New]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Editing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Times"]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[York]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 29 May 2008 14:43:21 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheila]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=394056&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Wired Drug Writer Has His Own Drug Expertise]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;Wired&lt;/em&gt; Drug Writer Has His Own Drug Expertise" href="http://gawker.com/disclosure/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">disclosure</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;Wired&lt;/em&gt; Drug Writer Has His Own Drug Expertise" href="http://gawker.com/393992/wired-drug-writer-has-his-own-drug-expertise" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;Wired&lt;/em&gt; Drug Writer Has His Own Drug Expertise" alt="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;Wired&lt;/em&gt; Drug Writer Has His Own Drug Expertise" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/05/small_coke-thumb.jpeg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<a href="http://gawker.com/assets/resources/2008/05/coke.jpeg"></a>Remember that <em>Wired </em><a href="http://www.wired.com/medtech/health/magazine/16-05/gs_05drugs">article </a>about the various pluses and minuses of drug use that got the <em>Times</em>' panties <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/19/business/media/19wired.html?partner=rssnyt&emc=rss">all in a bunch </a>about whether it would actually "promote drugs?" It was a <a href="http://gawker.com/tag/drugs/?i=5009641&t=meth-advocacy-in-wired-gets-the-times-all-uptight">stupid controversy </a>over a relatively innocuous drug story. The <em>Wired </em>piece didn't deserve criticism for its content, but it might have been served by some disclosure; the author of it, Mathew Honan, is a reformed cokehead. That fact didn't appear in <em>Wired</em>, but on Honan's own <a href="http://emptyage.honan.net/mth/2008/05/does-the-new-yo.html">blog</a>: 				<a href="http://gawker.com/393992/wired-drug-writer-has-his-own-drug-expertise" title="Click here to read more about Wired Drug Writer Has His Own Drug Expertise">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/393992/wired-drug-writer-has-his-own-drug-expertise]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-393992]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Disclosure]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Coke]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Controversies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[journalismism]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Meth]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Swinging dicks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wired]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 29 May 2008 12:38:18 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=393992&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Times' 'Miracle Fruit' Story Is A Ripoff Of Last Year's WSJ Article]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;Times&lt;/em&gt;' 'Miracle Fruit' Story Is A Ripoff Of Last Year's WSJ Article" href="http://gawker.com/rewrites/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">rewrites</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;Times&lt;/em&gt;' 'Miracle Fruit' Story Is A Ripoff Of Last Year's WSJ Article" href="http://gawker.com/393759/times-miracle-fruit-story-is-a-ripoff-of-last-years-wsj-article" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;Times&lt;/em&gt;' 'Miracle Fruit' Story Is A Ripoff Of Last Year's WSJ Article" alt="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;Times&lt;/em&gt;' 'Miracle Fruit' Story Is A Ripoff Of Last Year's WSJ Article" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/05/small_WSJcomposite-thumb.jpeg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<a href="http://gawker.com/assets/resources/2008/05/WSJcomposite.jpeg"></a>It's come to our attention that the <em>Times</em>' story today about <a href="http://gawker.com/393653/everybody-hopped-up-on-wacky-fruit">the "miracle fruit" that makes everything taste sweet </a>is&mdash;to use a technical journalism term&mdash;a big ripoff of a <em>Wall Street Journal </em>story from a year ago. A Page One <em>WSJ</em> story, at that. And it's not just that the <em>Times</em> wrote a piece on the same topic, which is common enough; they used a bunch of the same sources, and made the many of the same points in the same way. With not even a nod to the original! This is a semi-gotcha&mdash;it could have been solved by simply giving a little credit. It's not plagiarism, but it <em>is</em> enough to mightily piss off a fellow reporter. Check out the similarities: 				<a href="http://gawker.com/393759/times-miracle-fruit-story-is-a-ripoff-of-last-years-wsj-article" title="Click here to read more about Times' 'Miracle Fruit' Story Is A Ripoff Of Last Year's WSJ Article">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/393759/times-miracle-fruit-story-is-a-ripoff-of-last-years-wsj-article]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-393759]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rewrites]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Citations]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Credit where credit is due]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[journalismism]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Miracle Fruit]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wsj]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 28 May 2008 16:10:13 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=393759&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Everybody Hopped Up On Wacky Fruit]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Everybody Hopped Up On Wacky Fruit" href="http://gawker.com/drugs/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">drugs</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Everybody Hopped Up On Wacky Fruit" href="http://gawker.com/393653/everybody-hopped-up-on-wacky-fruit" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Everybody Hopped Up On Wacky Fruit" alt="Click here to read Everybody Hopped Up On Wacky Fruit" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/05/small_miraclefruit-thumb.jpeg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<a href="http://gawker.com/assets/resources/2008/05/miraclefruit.jpeg"></a>Wild urban youngsters these days are all <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/28/dining/28flavor.html?_r=2&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss&oref=slogin&oref=slogin">eating magic fruit </a>and guzzling Tabasco sauce, and there's really nothing you or the authorities can do about it. Internet-savvy hipsters flock to Long Island City rooftop <a href="http://flavortripping.wordpress.com/">parties</a> where a dealer/ guru named "Supreme Commander" hands them crazy berries to chew on, sending them into blissful fits of uncontrolled food-sampling. If it spreads, this "flavor tripping" phenomenon threatens to destroy the traditional notion of exotic seasonings that hip chefs in hip restaurants in hip neighborhoods have worked so hard to achieve. Because, let's face it: these magic berries sound awesome: 				<a href="http://gawker.com/393653/everybody-hopped-up-on-wacky-fruit" title="Click here to read more about Everybody Hopped Up On Wacky Fruit">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/393653/everybody-hopped-up-on-wacky-fruit]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-393653]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fruit]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Miracles]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Parties]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Phenomenons]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Restaurants]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tasting sweetness]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[trendwatch]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 28 May 2008 10:48:24 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=393653&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Non-Racist Whites Simply Don't Like Obama's Race]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Non-Racist Whites Simply Don't Like Obama's Race" href="http://gawker.com/debates/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">debates</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Non-Racist Whites Simply Don't Like Obama's Race" href="http://gawker.com/393306/non+racist-whites-simply-dont-like-obamas-race" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Non-Racist Whites Simply Don't Like Obama's Race" alt="Click here to read Non-Racist Whites Simply Don't Like Obama's Race" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/05/small_mcwdebate-thumb.jpeg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<a href="http://gawker.com/assets/resources/2008/05/mcwdebate.jpeg"></a>John McWhorter&mdash;<a href="http://gawker.com/392351/john-mcwhorter-sees-a-little-bill-buckley-in-himself">Bill Buckley-esque </a><em>NY Sun </em>columnist and <a href="http://gawker.com/356419/blackness-explained-bizarrely">bizarre racial thinker</a>&mdash;has taken his bizarre racial thinking act over to the <em>New York Times</em> for a day, presumably because conservative black academic columnists are hard to come by in New York City on a holiday weekend. In a video debate on the <em>Times</em>' website, McWhorter advances the novel theory that Barack Obama doesn't have to worry about <em>racism</em>; just his <em>race</em>. Here's an example of a statement that he says is <em>not </em>racist: "I won't vote for a black person because he's a radical type and would bring in Farrakhan." And hey, how come black people can hang around each other and it's okay, but white people can't? It's because "white people aren't allowed to be diverse." Okay! The other guy is, frankly, no match for McWhorter's secret redefinitions of words that negate their own meaning. The baffling debate, after the jump. 				<a href="http://gawker.com/393306/non+racist-whites-simply-dont-like-obamas-race" title="Click here to read more about Non-Racist Whites Simply Don't Like Obama's Race">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/393306/non+racist-whites-simply-dont-like-obamas-race]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-393306]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Debates]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Columnists]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[John McWhorter]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[journalismism]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[theories]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 27 May 2008 09:21:06 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=393306&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

