<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gawker: Words]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gawker.com/tag/words</link>
		<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://gawker.superfeedr.com/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" />
		<description><![CDATA[Gawker posts tagged Words]]></description>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[These Words Are Now Banned from the English Language]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read These Words Are Now Banned from the English Language" href="http://gawker.com/language/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">language</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read These Words Are Now Banned from the English Language" href="http://gawker.com/5872102/these-words-are-now-banned-from-the-english-language" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read These Words Are Now Banned from the English Language" alt="Click here to read These Words Are Now Banned from the English Language" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/12/small_a9c29facf1ba6e21378d2c15196a4658.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Every year Lake Superior State University bans a bunch of words and phrases from the English language for good. They just released their list today and, I must say, it is amazing. Oh wait, we can't say "amazing" anymore.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5872102/these-words-are-now-banned-from-the-english-language" title="Click here to read more about These Words Are Now Banned from the English Language">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5872102/these-words-are-now-banned-from-the-english-language]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5872102]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Jargon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lake superior state university]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shutterstock]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 30 Dec 2011 12:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Moylan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5872102&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[There Is No Way These Are the Most Annoying Words of 2011]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read There Is No Way These Are the Most Annoying Words of 2011" href="http://gawker.com/language/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">language</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read There Is No Way These Are the Most Annoying Words of 2011" href="http://gawker.com/5868909/there-is-no-way-these-are-the-most-annoying-words-of-2011" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read There Is No Way These Are the Most Annoying Words of 2011" alt="Click here to read There Is No Way These Are the Most Annoying Words of 2011" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/12/small_8e9d1100f9fea59cfcc27334476fb086.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				The Marist College Institute for Public Opinion has done its annual survey and declared "whatever" the "word or phrase considered to be the most annoying in casual conversation" in 2011. Right. Ummm... sure. I mean... whatever.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5868909/there-is-no-way-these-are-the-most-annoying-words-of-2011" title="Click here to read more about There Is No Way These Are the Most Annoying Words of 2011">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5868909/there-is-no-way-these-are-the-most-annoying-words-of-2011]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5868909]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Annoying]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[irritating]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[whatever]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 16 Dec 2011 16:55:01 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Max Read]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5868909&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[A New Word for 'Bro:' The Final Three]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read A New Word for 'Bro:' The Final Three" href="http://gawker.com/slurs/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">slurs</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read A New Word for 'Bro:' The Final Three" href="http://gawker.com/5867350/a-new-word-for-bro-the-final-three" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read A New Word for 'Bro:' The Final Three" alt="Click here to read A New Word for 'Bro:' The Final Three" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/12/small_421c7320fea7b8a344a57393cc9f8f66.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Seems like it was only last week when we decided that we needed to come up with <a href="http://gawker.com/5866363/we-need-a-new-word-for-bro">a new word for "bro."</a> What a journey it's been.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5867350/a-new-word-for-bro-the-final-three" title="Click here to read more about A New Word for 'Bro:' The Final Three">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5867350/a-new-word-for-bro-the-final-three]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5867350]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[slurs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Biffs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Bros]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Chads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[etymology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Scros]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[slang]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 12 Dec 2011 16:15:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5867350&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[A New Word for 'Bro:' Cast Your Vote Now]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read A New Word for 'Bro:' Cast Your Vote Now" href="http://gawker.com/slurs/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">slurs</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read A New Word for 'Bro:' Cast Your Vote Now" href="http://gawker.com/5866714/a-new-word-for-bro-cast-your-vote-now" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read A New Word for 'Bro:' Cast Your Vote Now" alt="Click here to read A New Word for 'Bro:' Cast Your Vote Now" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/12/small_bde29c7ff66aab1b4445071bacc64667.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Yesterday we asked you, the professional etymologists that make up the vast bulk of the Gawker readership, <a href="http://gawker.com/5866363/we-need-a-new-word-for-bro">to suggest a new word to replace "bro,"</a> so that we may be freed from the yoke of having to called people "bro," as we do now on a regular basis.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5866714/a-new-word-for-bro-cast-your-vote-now" title="Click here to read more about A New Word for 'Bro:' Cast Your Vote Now">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5866714/a-new-word-for-bro-cast-your-vote-now]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5866714]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[slurs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Bros]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[etymology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gettypic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Masculinity]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Men]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 09 Dec 2011 14:55:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5866714&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[We Need a New Word for 'Bro']]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read We Need a New Word for 'Bro'" href="http://gawker.com/slurs/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">slurs</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read We Need a New Word for 'Bro'" href="http://gawker.com/5866363/we-need-a-new-word-for-bro" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read We Need a New Word for 'Bro'" alt="Click here to read We Need a New Word for 'Bro'" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/12/small_dff326431e25b80c5a1d4fb47ec8224d.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Bros. <a href="gawker.com/5863027/the-unstoppable-rise-of-the-american-bro">They're here</a>. They're bros. <a href="gawker.com/5865571/bros-and-the-search-for-perpetual-childhood">Get used to it</a>. They're not, however, poetic. "Bro." It sounds like an Eastern European cough. Can you think of a better word for these creatures? <!-- %JUMP:More &raquo;% -->				<a href="http://gawker.com/5866363/we-need-a-new-word-for-bro" title="Click here to read more about We Need a New Word for 'Bro'">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5866363/we-need-a-new-word-for-bro]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5866363]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[slurs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Ask The Reader]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Bros]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[etymology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Men]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 08 Dec 2011 14:05:51 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5866363&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[One Man's Quest to Tweet Every Word in the English Language]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read One Man's Quest to Tweet Every Word in the English Language" href="http://gawker.com/the-internet/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">theinternet</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read One Man's Quest to Tweet Every Word in the English Language" href="http://gawker.com/5854314/one-mans-quest-to-tweet-every-word-in-the-english-language" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read One Man's Quest to Tweet Every Word in the English Language" alt="Click here to read One Man's Quest to Tweet Every Word in the English Language" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/10/small_1028_word1.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Since late 2007, an obscure Twitter account has been automatically tweeting a single word every half an hour. The ultimate goal: to tweet every word in the English language. We spoke to the guy behind Everyword. <!-- %JUMP:More &raquo;% -->				<a href="http://gawker.com/5854314/one-mans-quest-to-tweet-every-word-in-the-english-language" title="Click here to read more about One Man's Quest to Tweet Every Word in the English Language">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5854314/one-mans-quest-to-tweet-every-word-in-the-english-language]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5854314]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[The Internet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Adam parish]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[EveryWord]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 28 Oct 2011 15:36:40 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5854314&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[What We Talk About When We Talk About 9/11]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read What We Talk About When We Talk About 9/11" href="http://gawker.com/9%5c11/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">911</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read What We Talk About When We Talk About 9/11" href="http://gawker.com/5839065/what-we-talk-about-when-we-talk-about-911" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read What We Talk About When We Talk About 9/11" alt="Click here to read What We Talk About When We Talk About 9/11" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/09/small_wordcloudfinal.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				How do talk about 9/11, ten years later? What stories do we tell? What ideas grab us? We made a word cloud of editorials from 15 prominent local and national papers to see what came up.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5839065/what-we-talk-about-when-we-talk-about-911" title="Click here to read more about What We Talk About When We Talk About 9/11">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5839065/what-we-talk-about-when-we-talk-about-911]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5839065]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Editorials]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[word clouds]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 11 Sep 2011 10:00:48 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Max Read]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5839065&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA['ZOMG' Is Now an Official Word or Something]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read 'ZOMG' Is Now an Official Word or Something" href="http://gawker.com/words/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">words</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read 'ZOMG' Is Now an Official Word or Something" href="http://gawker.com/5808349/zomg-is-now-an-official-word-or-something" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read 'ZOMG' Is Now an Official Word or Something" alt="Click here to read 'ZOMG' Is Now an Official Word or Something" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/06/small_shutterstock_74593420.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				The Oxford Dictionaries Online <a href="http://digitallife.today.com/_news/2011/06/03/6778320-nsfw-zomg-and-twittersphere-added-to-dictionary">has apparently added</a> the popular internet exclamation "ZOMG" (short for Zak Orth's Mating Grounds) to its big list of words. They've also included "NSFW" (Nudie Sex Fisting Women) and "Twittersphere." Oh brother.  I mean, they're citing them as abbreviations and informal words and stuff, not actual King's English, but still. What an age we live in!				<a href="http://gawker.com/5808349/zomg-is-now-an-official-word-or-something" title="Click here to read more about 'ZOMG' Is Now an Official Word or Something">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5808349/zomg-is-now-an-official-word-or-something]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5808349]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Dictionaries]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shutterstock]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ZOMG]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 03 Jun 2011 15:24:46 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5808349&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA['Sexting' and Other Technological Gibberish Now Official Words]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read 'Sexting' and Other Technological Gibberish Now Official Words" href="http://gawker.com/language/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">language</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read 'Sexting' and Other Technological Gibberish Now Official Words" href="http://gawker.com/5770550/sexting-and-other-technological-gibberish-now-official-words" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read 'Sexting' and Other Technological Gibberish Now Official Words" alt="Click here to read 'Sexting' and Other Technological Gibberish Now Official Words" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/02/small_dictionarylady.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #oxforddictionaries" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #oxforddictionaries" href="http://gawker.com/#!oxforddictionaries/">Oxford Dictionaries</a> Online have added a "buttload" of new words, many of which are related to the internet and texting. Yes, "buttload" is one. So is "sexting." Now we're never going to get rid of that horrible word. There are more.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5770550/sexting-and-other-technological-gibberish-now-official-words" title="Click here to read more about 'Sexting' and Other Technological Gibberish Now Official Words">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5770550/sexting-and-other-technological-gibberish-now-official-words]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5770550]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Oxford dictionaries]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sexting]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shutterstock]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Vocabulary]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 25 Feb 2011 15:59:25 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Moylan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5770550&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Only Important Part of Obama's Speech Was a Salmon Joke]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read The Only Important Part of Obama's Speech Was a Salmon Joke" href="http://gawker.com/words/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">words</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read The Only Important Part of Obama's Speech Was a Salmon Joke" href="http://gawker.com/5744056/the-only-important-part-of-obamas-speech-was-a-salmon-joke" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read The Only Important Part of Obama's Speech Was a Salmon Joke" alt="Click here to read The Only Important Part of Obama's Speech Was a Salmon Joke" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/01/small_sotuwordcloud.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				How did President Obama rally the nation last night with his <a href="http://gawker.com/5743844/barack-obama-stole-his-empty-state-of-the-union-slogan-from-newt-gingrich">Newt Gingrich-lifted slogan,</a> "Winning the Future"? Are inspired 12-year-olds across the nation already building electric cars from algae? Perhaps. But mostly, people just remember Obama's "salmon" joke.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5744056/the-only-important-part-of-obamas-speech-was-a-salmon-joke" title="Click here to read more about The Only Important Part of Obama's Speech Was a Salmon Joke">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5744056/the-only-important-part-of-obamas-speech-was-a-salmon-joke]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5744056]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Jokes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Salmon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Speeches]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[State Of The Union]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[word clouds]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 26 Jan 2011 14:39:16 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Newell]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5744056&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Most Glorious Apology of Our Time: Chris Brown's 'Fallaciloquences']]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Most Glorious Apology of Our Time: Chris Brown's 'Fallaciloquences'" href="http://gawker.com/apologies/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">apologies</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Most Glorious Apology of Our Time: Chris Brown's 'Fallaciloquences'" href="http://gawker.com/5732758/most-glorious-apology-of-our-time-chris-browns-fallaciloquences" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Most Glorious Apology of Our Time: Chris Brown's 'Fallaciloquences'" alt="Click here to read Most Glorious Apology of Our Time: Chris Brown's 'Fallaciloquences'" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/01/small_rickyromance.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				After <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #chrisbrown" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #chrisbrown" href="http://gawker.com/tag/chrisbrown/">Chris Brown</a> <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2010/12/29/chris-brown-raz-b-feud-racial-homophobic-slurs-in-twitter-feud/">called</a> <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #razb" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #razb" href="http://gawker.com/tag/razb/">Raz B</a>  a "butplugged" "homothug," Raz's brother <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #rickyromance" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #rickyromance" href="http://gawker.com/tag/rickyromance/">Ricky Romance</a> <a href="http://www.worldstarhiphop.com/videos/video640.php?v=wshh8ZFp1OUX6evSNt13&set_size=1">threatened</a> Chris with murder. Now Ricky's burying the hatchet, and his <i>Jabberwock</i>-like <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2011/01/12/ricky-romance-apology-chris-brown-nanocephalos-raz-b-b2k-humgruffin/">apology</a>&mdash;featuring words like "fallaciloquences," "eclaircise," and "humgruffin"&mdash;is a work of art.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5732758/most-glorious-apology-of-our-time-chris-browns-fallaciloquences" title="Click here to read more about Most Glorious Apology of Our Time: Chris Brown's 'Fallaciloquences'">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5732758/most-glorious-apology-of-our-time-chris-browns-fallaciloquences]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5732758]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Apologies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Chris Brown]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fallaciloquences]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[homophobia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Humgruffin]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[open letters]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[raz b]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Ricky Romance]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tweetg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 13 Jan 2011 12:06:47 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maureen O'Connor]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5732758&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA['Austerity' Is America's Most Looked-Up Word]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read 'Austerity' Is America's Most Looked-Up Word" href="http://gawker.com/words/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">words</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read 'Austerity' Is America's Most Looked-Up Word" href="http://gawker.com/5715429/austerity-is-americas-most-looked+up-word" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read 'Austerity' Is America's Most Looked-Up Word" alt="Click here to read 'Austerity' Is America's Most Looked-Up Word" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2010/12/small_dictionary.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Merriam-Webster.com <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/austerity_ranked_as_word_of_the_AWYDWLXyw5luy1PhMjvHYK?CMP=OTC-rss&FEEDNAME=">announced today</a> that austerity was their most looked-up word in 2010, ahead of pragmatic, moratorium, and, gasp!, socialism.  Fitting that people are looking for austerity in these penny-pinched times.  "With great austerity, Sarah Palin boundered across the Alaskan tundra..."				<a href="http://gawker.com/5715429/austerity-is-americas-most-looked+up-word" title="Click here to read more about 'Austerity' Is America's Most Looked-Up Word">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5715429/austerity-is-americas-most-looked+up-word]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5715429]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Austerity]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Dictionaries]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[merriam-webster]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 20 Dec 2010 17:30:27 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5715429&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Oxford English Dictionary Uses 9,400 Words for 'Information' Entry]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
									</div>
				The word <a href="http://preview.oed.com/viewdictionaryentry/Entry/95568">"information"</a> got a very long <a href="http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2010/dec/08/information-palace/">overhaul in the latest Oxford English Dictionary</a> revision.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5710108/oxford-english-dictionary-uses-9400-words-for-information-entry" title="Click here to read more about Oxford English Dictionary Uses 9,400 Words for 'Information' Entry">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5710108/oxford-english-dictionary-uses-9400-words-for-information-entry]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5710108]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Information]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Oxford English Dictionary]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 09 Dec 2010 07:13:10 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Neumann]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5710108&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[NYC School Teacher Fined and Suspended for Saying 'Coño']]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read NYC School Teacher Fined and Suspended for Saying 'Coño'" href="http://gawker.com/linguistics/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">linguistics</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read NYC School Teacher Fined and Suspended for Saying 'Coño'" href="http://gawker.com/5700621/nyc-school-teacher-fined-and-suspended-for-saying-coo" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read NYC School Teacher Fined and Suspended for Saying 'Coño'" alt="Click here to read NYC School Teacher Fined and Suspended for Saying 'Coño'" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2010/11/small_spanish_dictionary.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #newyork" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #newyork" href="http://gawker.com/tag/newyork/">New York</a> City high school teacher <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=131646958">Carlos Garcia was suspended and fined $15,000</a> for saying "coño" in his class &mdash; a Spanish word that can be taken <a href="http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/co%C3%B1o">several very different ways</a>. He's suing the city and denies saying it.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5700621/nyc-school-teacher-fined-and-suspended-for-saying-coo" title="Click here to read more about NYC School Teacher Fined and Suspended for Saying 'Coño'">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5700621/nyc-school-teacher-fined-and-suspended-for-saying-coo]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5700621]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[linguistics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Harsh]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[NYC]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[School]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Teachers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 28 Nov 2010 12:56:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Neumann]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5700621&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Is Boston Really Gonzo?]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Is Boston Really Gonzo?" href="http://gawker.com/lexicography/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">lexicography</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Is Boston Really Gonzo?" href="http://gawker.com/5696482/is-boston-really-gonzo" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Is Boston Really Gonzo?" alt="Click here to read Is Boston Really Gonzo?" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2010/11/small_gonzo.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Where did Hunter S. Thompson get the word "gonzo?" The accepted story's always been that it was a bit of Boston slang that a Boston newspaper editor first hung on Thompson. But&mdash;suck it Boston&mdash;that <a href="http://www.boston.com/yourtown/cambridge/articles/2010/11/21/historian_casts_doubt_on_origin_of_gonzo_label/?page=full">may be </a>a myth!				<a href="http://gawker.com/5696482/is-boston-really-gonzo" title="Click here to read more about Is Boston Really Gonzo?">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5696482/is-boston-really-gonzo]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5696482]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Lexicography]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[disputes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gonzo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hunter s thompson]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Hunter Thompson]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 22 Nov 2010 15:23:17 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5696482&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[This Inspirational Mashup About Words Will Make You Smile]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read This Inspirational Mashup About Words Will Make You Smile" href="http://gawker.com/words/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">words</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read This Inspirational Mashup About Words Will Make You Smile" href="http://gawker.com/5679898/inspirational-mashup-will-make-you-smile" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read This Inspirational Mashup About Words Will Make You Smile" alt="Click here to read This Inspirational Mashup About Words Will Make You Smile" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/13242/2010/11/small_vtno87hdgqm.jpg"/>
						<span class="play_icon"></span>					</a></div>
									</div>
				This beautiful video of sounds and pictures is super pretty and made entirely of found YouTube video clips. It comes to us as a <a href="http://tv.gawker.com/5662237/words-defined-without-the-use-of-words">follow-up to their original "Words" video</a>. One man's trash is another man's mashup.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5679898/inspirational-mashup-will-make-you-smile" title="Click here to read more about This Inspirational Mashup About Words Will Make You Smile">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5679898/inspirational-mashup-will-make-you-smile]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5679898]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 03 Nov 2010 10:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kate Castellana]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5679898&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Definitive List of Words Google Thinks Are Naughty]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read The Definitive List of Words Google Thinks Are Naughty" href="http://gawker.com/word-police/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">wordpolice</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read The Definitive List of Words Google Thinks Are Naughty" href="http://gawker.com/5649635/the-definitive-list-of-words-google-thinks-are-naughty" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read The Definitive List of Words Google Thinks Are Naughty" alt="Click here to read The Definitive List of Words Google Thinks Are Naughty" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/11/small_6ea61ee020c6926c9b68e636b15a8693.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				The new Google Instant <a href="http://gawker.com/5633000/google-is-now-on-crack">tries to guess</a> what you're searching for while you type. But not if it thinks your search is dirty. Some enterprising people have compiled an exhaustive list of words and phrases Google Instant won't auto-search for.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5649635/the-definitive-list-of-words-google-thinks-are-naughty" title="Click here to read more about The Definitive List of Words Google Thinks Are Naughty">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5649635/the-definitive-list-of-words-google-thinks-are-naughty]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5649635]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Word police]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Google Instant]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Lists]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Search engines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tweet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Valleywag]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 28 Sep 2010 03:05:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5649635&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Please Call Your Vagina Tattoo a 'Twattoo,' Not a 'Vatoo']]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Please Call Your Vagina Tattoo a 'Twattoo,' Not a 'Vatoo'" href="http://gawker.com/requests/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">requests</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Please Call Your Vagina Tattoo a 'Twattoo,' Not a 'Vatoo'" href="http://gawker.com/5617400/please-call-your-vagina-tattoo-a-twattoo-not-a-vatoo" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Please Call Your Vagina Tattoo a 'Twattoo,' Not a 'Vatoo'" alt="Click here to read Please Call Your Vagina Tattoo a 'Twattoo,' Not a 'Vatoo'" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2012/01/small_0ba36d0936be46008ed799df0f59882f.jpg"/>
						<span class="play_icon"></span>					</a></div>
									</div>
				I am pleased to announce that vagina tattoos are officially mainstream, with a how-to <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jr4yPNGHy_4&feature=player_embedded">video</a> on YouTube and blog posts <a href="http://jezebel.com/5616894/vatooing-your-vagina-a-how+to-video">here</a>, <a href="http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/archives/2010/08/vatooing_anothe.php">here</a>, and <a href="http://www.theluxuryspot.com/2010/08/09/vatooing-your-vagina-because-vajazzling-is-obsolete/">here</a>. Unfortunately, the internet keeps calling it a "vatoo," when the superior term is clearly "<a href="http://gawker.com/5588325/meet-your-new-vagina-decorating-trend-twattoos">twattoo</a>."				<a href="http://gawker.com/5617400/please-call-your-vagina-tattoo-a-twattoo-not-a-vatoo" title="Click here to read more about Please Call Your Vagina Tattoo a 'Twattoo,' Not a 'Vatoo'">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5617400/please-call-your-vagina-tattoo-a-twattoo-not-a-vatoo]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5617400]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Requests]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lexicon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[slang]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tattoo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tattoos]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[twats]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Twattoo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Twattoos]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Vaginas]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 20 Aug 2010 13:34:08 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maureen O'Connor]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5617400&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[What Should We Call Movies That Aren't in 3D?]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read What Should We Call Movies That Aren't in 3D?" href="http://gawker.com/linguistics/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">linguistics</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read What Should We Call Movies That Aren't in 3D?" href="http://gawker.com/5508466/what-should-we-call-movies-that-arent-in-3d" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read What Should We Call Movies That Aren't in 3D?" alt="Click here to read What Should We Call Movies That Aren't in 3D?" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2010/04/glasses.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<em>Clash of the Titans</em> is finally open! But friends and <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/entertainment/movies/titans_from_page_2tL3W3LX82UvY6PEJsilAP">reviewers</a> told me that the 3D version is a rip off. But what about the "regular" version? Well, I might check it out if it had a better name.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5508466/what-should-we-call-movies-that-arent-in-3d" title="Click here to read more about What Should We Call Movies That Aren't in 3D?">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5508466/what-should-we-call-movies-that-arent-in-3d]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5508466]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[linguistics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[2D]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3D]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Defamer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gettypic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 02 Apr 2010 17:38:27 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Moylan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5508466&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Your New Hipster Slur: Fauxhemians]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Your New Hipster Slur: Fauxhemians" href="http://gawker.com/winners/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">winners</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Your New Hipster Slur: Fauxhemians" href="http://gawker.com/5500197/your-new-hipster-slur-fauxhemians" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Your New Hipster Slur: Fauxhemians" alt="Click here to read Your New Hipster Slur: Fauxhemians" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2012/01/small_37df5ab9d061f6a1c825b9a624e45508.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<a href="http://gawker.com/5496566/we-need-a-new-word-for-hipster">Hipsters are dead</a>. Long(?) live Fauxhemians.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5500197/your-new-hipster-slur-fauxhemians" title="Click here to read more about Your New Hipster Slur: Fauxhemians">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5500197/your-new-hipster-slur-fauxhemians]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5500197]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Winners]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fauxhemian]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fauxhemians]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Hipsters]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[New slurs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[slurs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Sure to be popular things]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:58:48 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5500197&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[A New Word for 'Hipster:' The Final Vote]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read A New Word for 'Hipster:' The Final Vote" href="http://gawker.com/polls/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">polls</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read A New Word for 'Hipster:' The Final Vote" href="http://gawker.com/5499153/a-new-word-for-hipster-the-final-vote" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read A New Word for 'Hipster:' The Final Vote" alt="Click here to read A New Word for 'Hipster:' The Final Vote" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2012/01/small_d75e2b98837662c31ca38e0440ac69d1.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				The thoroughly unwarranted level of interest in <a href="http://gawker.com/5496566/we-need-a-new-word-for-hipster">finding word to replace "hipster"</a> has reached a fever pitch! We gave you <a href="http://gawker.com/5497514/vote-for-the-new-word-for-hipster">20 options</a> to choose from. The top five vote-getters are below. This vote will determine <strong>everything</strong>. So, vote.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5499153/a-new-word-for-hipster-the-final-vote" title="Click here to read more about A New Word for 'Hipster:' The Final Vote">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5499153/a-new-word-for-hipster-the-final-vote]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5499153]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Doucheoisie]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fauxhemians]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Hipsters]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Lexicography]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Pabstsmears]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Probos]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[slurs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Trendsluts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:50:03 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5499153&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Vote For the New Word for 'Hipster']]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Vote For the New Word for 'Hipster'" href="http://gawker.com/polls/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">polls</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Vote For the New Word for 'Hipster'" href="http://gawker.com/5497514/vote-for-the-new-word-for-hipster" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Vote For the New Word for 'Hipster'" alt="Click here to read Vote For the New Word for 'Hipster'" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2012/01/small_cbae8c7e82d18b0ced447c3126d655a8.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				You hipsters really came through. We asked for a new slur to replace "hipster," and <a href="http://gawker.com/5496566/we-need-a-new-word-for-hipster">nearly a thousand of you (presumably unemployed) commenters made suggestions</a>. Jesus. We've narrowed it down to 20. Cast your vote below.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5497514/vote-for-the-new-word-for-hipster" title="Click here to read more about Vote For the New Word for 'Hipster'">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5497514/vote-for-the-new-word-for-hipster]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5497514]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Crowd participation]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Hipster]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Lexicography]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[slurs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:24:02 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5497514&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[We Need a New Word for 'Hipster']]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read We Need a New Word for 'Hipster'" href="http://gawker.com/slurs/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">slurs</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read We Need a New Word for 'Hipster'" href="http://gawker.com/5496566/we-need-a-new-word-for-hipster" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read We Need a New Word for 'Hipster'" alt="Click here to read We Need a New Word for 'Hipster'" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2012/01/small_dac0dcc7ec3b84a02a71873cfb02e60d.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<a href="http://nycthe.tumblr.com/post/453370981/im-confused-it-seems-no-one-likes-the-word">Okay</a>. <a href="http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/archives/2010/03/is_the_medias_h.php">Yes</a>. We said we were <a href="http://gawker.com/5431331/who-is-the-hipster-of-the-decade">going to ban</a> the god damn word "hipster," but we have<a href="http://gawker.com/5494769/if-only-fake-issues-could-solve-our-real-problems"> lapsed</a>. <em>Mea culpa</em>, and shit. The real problem is that there's not a pithy replacement word. That's where you come in.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5496566/we-need-a-new-word-for-hipster" title="Click here to read more about We Need a New Word for 'Hipster'">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5496566/we-need-a-new-word-for-hipster]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5496566]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[slurs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Crowd participation]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Hipsters]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Kids These Days]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Lexicography]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[slang]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:57:13 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5496566&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Is Jules Kirby a Racist Homophobe or Does She Just Play One on TV?]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Is Jules Kirby a Racist Homophobe or Does She Just Play One on TV?" href="http://gawker.com/mysteries/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">mysteries</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Is Jules Kirby a Racist Homophobe or Does She Just Play One on TV?" href="http://gawker.com/5492211/is-jules-kirby-a-racist-homophobe-or-does-she-just-play-one-on-tv" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Is Jules Kirby a Racist Homophobe or Does She Just Play One on TV?" alt="Click here to read Is Jules Kirby a Racist Homophobe or Does She Just Play One on TV?" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/11/small_4aa2c5cc18a50ae5f5b8228e837d0b25.png"/>
						<span class="play_icon"></span>					</a></div>
									</div>
				 Remember <i>High Society</i>?  It's that <a href="http://gawker.com/5491132/high-society--the-blinding-of-a-socialite">Tinsley Mortimer</a> reality show that's most notable for Jules Kirby, a drunken partygirl who says bad things about blacks, Jews, and gays.  Now she's claiming that the CW put those words in her mouth.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5492211/is-jules-kirby-a-racist-homophobe-or-does-she-just-play-one-on-tv" title="Click here to read more about Is Jules Kirby a Racist Homophobe or Does She Just Play One on TV?">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5492211/is-jules-kirby-a-racist-homophobe-or-does-she-just-play-one-on-tv]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5492211]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Mysteries]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[high society]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jules kirby]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Reality TV]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[The Cw]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:44:45 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5492211&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Please Stop Saying These Words!]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Please Stop Saying These Words!" href="http://gawker.com/dicktionary/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">dicktionary</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Please Stop Saying These Words!" href="http://gawker.com/5480270/please-stop-saying-these-words" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Please Stop Saying These Words!" alt="Click here to read Please Stop Saying These Words!" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2012/01/small_293c7271220a041189136b4af32ec016.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				While we're fine with people using the word "retard" liberally, there are some words, phrases, and linguistic constructions that are so tired and lazy they need to be ended. Here are a few things that drive us mad.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5480270/please-stop-saying-these-words" title="Click here to read more about Please Stop Saying These Words!">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5480270/please-stop-saying-these-words]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5480270]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Dicktionary]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fail]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Listicle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[not afraid to be servicey]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[The Rules]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:26:46 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Moylan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5480270&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The World's Worst Opinion Section Takes on Bad Words]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
									</div>
				"Retard." It is still legal to say it. <a href="http://wonkette.com/413714/washington-post-opiners-debate-what-about-retards">But <i>should it be?</i></a>				<a href="http://gawker.com/5472368/the-worlds-worst-opinion-section-takes-on-bad-words" title="Click here to read more about The World's Worst Opinion Section Takes on Bad Words">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5472368/the-worlds-worst-opinion-section-takes-on-bad-words]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5472368]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Important debates]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[retards]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sarah palin]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:08:49 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pareene]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5472368&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Debate Over the Word 'Retard' Rages On]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Debate Over the Word 'Retard' Rages On" href="http://gawker.com/words/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">words</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Debate Over the Word 'Retard' Rages On" href="http://gawker.com/5464949/debate-over-the-word-retard-rages-on" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Debate Over the Word 'Retard' Rages On" alt="Click here to read Debate Over the Word 'Retard' Rages On" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2010/02/93214037_01.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				First <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #rahmemanuel" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #rahmemanuel" href="http://gawker.com/tag/rahmemanuel/">Rahm Emanuel</a> called a plan he didn't like 'fucking retarded.' Then <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #sarahpalin" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #sarahpalin" href="http://gawker.com/tag/sarahpalin/">Sarah Palin</a> called for his resignation. Then he apologized and made nice. Now a Department of Justice job advertisement welcomes applicants with 'mental retardation'.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5464949/debate-over-the-word-retard-rages-on" title="Click here to read more about Debate Over the Word 'Retard' Rages On">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5464949/debate-over-the-word-retard-rages-on]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5464949]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Rahm Emanuel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[retard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sarah palin]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 05 Feb 2010 07:50:08 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ravi Somaiya]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5464949&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Your New Political Scandal Lexicon]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Your New Political Scandal Lexicon" href="http://gawker.com/sparking-things/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">sparkingthings</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Your New Political Scandal Lexicon" href="http://gawker.com/5312016/your-new-political-scandal-lexicon" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Your New Political Scandal Lexicon" alt="Click here to read Your New Political Scandal Lexicon" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2009/07/custom_1245889800240_AP090403018691.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				What a wonderful summer it has been, for fans of the dragged-out meltdowns of prominent Republican politicians! We should perhaps pause to recognize the contributions <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged JOHN ENSIGN" title="Click here to read more posts tagged JOHN ENSIGN" href="http://gawker.com/tag/john-ensign/">John Ensign</a>, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MARK SANFORD" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MARK SANFORD" href="http://gawker.com/tag/mark-sanford/">Mark Sanford</a>, and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SARAH PALIN" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SARAH PALIN" href="http://gawker.com/tag/sarah-palin/">Sarah Palin</a> have made to our American language.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5312016/your-new-political-scandal-lexicon" title="Click here to read more about Your New Political Scandal Lexicon">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5312016/your-new-political-scandal-lexicon]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5312016]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Sparking things]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[age of vulgarity]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[John Ensign]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mark sanford]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sarah palin]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Scandal]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[the lexicon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:21:19 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pareene]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5312016&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Everybody's Hating Voicemail Now!]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Everybody's Hating Voicemail Now!" href="http://gawker.com/trendwatch/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">trendwatch</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Everybody's Hating Voicemail Now!" href="http://gawker.com/5195739/everybodys-hating-voicemail-now" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Everybody's Hating Voicemail Now!" alt="Click here to read Everybody's Hating Voicemail Now!" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2009/04/custom_1238694085768_phone.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Voicemail is totally dead. It takes too much listening. Is this just some fancy notion, or the truth? Either way, it's a <em>New York Times</em> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/02/fashion/02voicemail.html?pagewanted=1&ref=style">trend story</a>, blammo!				<a href="http://gawker.com/5195739/everybodys-hating-voicemail-now" title="Click here to read more about Everybody's Hating Voicemail Now!">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5195739/everybodys-hating-voicemail-now]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5195739]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[trendwatch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Everybody's Doing It]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Nyt]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[The Future]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[The Youth]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Voicemail]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 02 Apr 2009 13:43:01 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5195739&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Words to Kill So 'Dirty' May Live]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Words to Kill So 'Dirty' May Live" href="http://gawker.com/language/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">language</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Words to Kill So 'Dirty' May Live" href="http://gawker.com/5160890/words-to-kill-so-dirty-may-live" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Words to Kill So 'Dirty' May Live" alt="Click here to read Words to Kill So 'Dirty' May Live" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2009/02/custom_1235667581036_shortz.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Academics remove themselves to ivory towers to puzzle over hard problems. But their isolation sometimes leads to hilarious results &mdash; like the discovery that "bad" and "dirty" are endangered linguistic species.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5160890/words-to-kill-so-dirty-may-live" title="Click here to read more about Words to Kill So 'Dirty' May Live">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5160890/words-to-kill-so-dirty-may-live]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5160890]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[what we need more of is science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:04:49 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Owen Thomas]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5160890&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Democrats Deceiving America With "Words"]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Democrats Deceiving America With &quot;Words&quot;" href="http://gawker.com/rhetoric/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">rhetoric</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Democrats Deceiving America With &quot;Words&quot;" href="http://gawker.com/5099185/democrats-deceiving-america-with-words" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Democrats Deceiving America With &quot;Words&quot;" alt="Click here to read Democrats Deceiving America With &quot;Words&quot;" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/11/deception.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				America hated the first "bailout," according to pollsters. Until pollsters described it without using the term "bailout," which made Americans much more supportive of it. So Barack Obama's multi-billion dollar economy-saving expenditure plans were soon referred to as "stimulus packages," which connotes happy visions of Bush sending everyone checks for a few hundred bucks. But now <i>that</i> isn't good enough for whiny Americans either! So please enjoy your <i>economic recovery program</i>, everyone!				<a href="http://gawker.com/5099185/democrats-deceiving-america-with-words" title="Click here to read more about Democrats Deceiving America With "Words"">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5099185/democrats-deceiving-america-with-words]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5099185]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Rhetoric]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bailout]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Freakoutnomics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Rahm Emanuel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:36:11 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pareene]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5099185&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[What 'Meh' Says About Us]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read What 'Meh' Says About Us" href="http://gawker.com/words/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">words</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read What 'Meh' Says About Us" href="http://gawker.com/5090899/what-meh-says-about-us" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read What 'Meh' Says About Us" alt="Click here to read What 'Meh' Says About Us" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/11/meh_cat.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Meh, the unimpressed expression of "who cares" coined on <em>The Simpsons</em>, has now officially entered the lexicon.  <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27758035/">It's being listed in the <em>Collins English Dictionary</em>!</a>  In these crazy times of war and crumbling economy it could have been some dread-filled "word" like ZOMG that got the honor, or it may have been a Hope and Change rally word like Obamamania (well, all right, that would never happen, but still).  I guess it speaks to a young generation defined not by apathy exactly, but by a sense that we're (they're?) not supposed to be easily impressed, that this dismissive, tarty little word made the list.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5090899/what-meh-says-about-us" title="Click here to read more about What 'Meh' Says About Us">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5090899/what-meh-says-about-us]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5090899]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[meh]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[The Simpsons]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[the youngs]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:16:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5090899&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Celebrities Saying 'Colored' Is Way More Awkward Than When Your Grandfather Says It]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Celebrities Saying 'Colored' Is Way More Awkward Than When Your Grandfather Says It" href="http://gawker.com/words/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">words</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Celebrities Saying 'Colored' Is Way More Awkward Than When Your Grandfather Says It" href="http://gawker.com/5083541/celebrities-saying-colored-is-way-more-awkward-than-when-your-grandfather-says-it" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Celebrities Saying 'Colored' Is Way More Awkward Than When Your Grandfather Says It" alt="Click here to read Celebrities Saying 'Colored' Is Way More Awkward Than When Your Grandfather Says It" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/11/Picture_3_01.png"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				One way to not have an intelligent discussion about race these day is to use the term "colored" to describe black people.  It's antiquated and grampa-ish, like saying "Oriental" or "cripple."  I think you're allowed to say "person of color" but not "colored."  (Right?)  So it's too bad to see that some big-time celebrities are using the term while trying to sound progressive and One Worldy.  Both lesbians and the British alike.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5083541/celebrities-saying-colored-is-way-more-awkward-than-when-your-grandfather-says-it" title="Click here to read more about Celebrities Saying 'Colored' Is Way More Awkward Than When Your Grandfather Says It">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5083541/celebrities-saying-colored-is-way-more-awkward-than-when-your-grandfather-says-it]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5083541]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Daniel Craig]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Lindsay Lohan]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:08:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5083541&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Oh Snap!  Christian Siriano Disses 'Girlicious']]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Oh Snap!  Christian Siriano Disses 'Girlicious'" href="http://gawker.com/words/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">words</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Oh Snap!  Christian Siriano Disses 'Girlicious'" href="http://gawker.com/5028890/oh-snap--christian-siriano-disses-girlicious" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Oh Snap!  Christian Siriano Disses 'Girlicious'" alt="Click here to read Oh Snap!  Christian Siriano Disses 'Girlicious'" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/07/tranny.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				So weird orange rutabaga Blayne, from the new season of <em>Project Runway</em>, likes to nance around the design room saying "girlicious," among other annoying things.  He seems to be reeeeally pushing it as a catchphrase (though, he <a href="http://www.girliciousmusic.com/">didn't coin it</a>).  This has incurred the wrath of last season's fitfully gay catchphrase machine Christian Siriano, who more organically wove "fierce," "tranny," "hot mess," and various combinations of the three into the fabric of the New York fashionista vernacular.  Though, you know, "fierce" was there way before little mister monkey man Siriano came chimping along.  As were the other two.  I guess he just used them  more effectively than people before him, or something.  What fucking ever, he doesn't like Blayne's lame "forced" word and he's not afraid to say so.  Watch a video, from <a href="http://blogs.nypost.com/popwrap/archives/2008/07/siriano_hates_g.html">Popwrap</a>, of Christian doing just that after the jump.  Oh, and that <a href="http://gawker.com/5028631/like-the-designer-himself-christian-sirianos-new-collection-is-tiny-and-strange">new collection of his?</a>  Already sold out.  How rude, tranny. You got it, girlicious.  Cowatranny!  Or, um, Eat my hot mess.  Ew.  Wait.  Um, one more.  Life is like a box of trannies.  Does that work? 				<a href="http://gawker.com/5028890/oh-snap--christian-siriano-disses-girlicious" title="Click here to read more about Oh Snap!  Christian Siriano Disses 'Girlicious'">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5028890/oh-snap--christian-siriano-disses-girlicious]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5028890]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Christian Siriano]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Project Runway]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[The Gays]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:48:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5028890&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The 20 Words You Can't Say on Cellphone TV]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read The 20 Words You Can't Say on Cellphone TV" href="http://gawker.com/words/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">words</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read The 20 Words You Can't Say on Cellphone TV" href="http://gawker.com/397348/the-20-words-you-cant-say-on-cellphone-tv" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read The 20 Words You Can't Say on Cellphone TV" alt="Click here to read The 20 Words You Can't Say on Cellphone TV" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/06/small_censored.png"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Just as the <a href="http://gawker.com/tag/clips/?i=396796&t=7-moments-of-george-carlin-greatness">late, great George Carlin</a> had his wonderful 7 Words You Can't Say on Television bit, comedian Max Silvestri now knows of 20 or so words that one just cannot say on Verizon's VCast cellphone television programming.  Silvestri (of the delightful <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPsUmhqncAg">Gabe and Max's Internet Thing</a>) <a href="http://www.maxsilvestri.com/index.php/2008/06/27/the-20-words-you-cant-say-on-web-20-avision/">attempted to say the word "choad"</a> on a podcast that was to be distributed to mobile companies.  Curious as to why that word, out of so many, was singled out, he went in search of Information.  He was eventually given a detailed list of inappropriate content and verbiage that will be censored, including the ultimate list of 20  "Level 0" no-no words that can never, under any circumstances slip from the lips on VCast.  That list includes the obvious "n-word" variations (but, apparently, other racial slurs are A-OK?) and the typical group of naughty <em>sexual</em> terminology.  Makes sense, fair enough.  But um, why make the "cornhole"/"corn-hole" distinction?  And what in green acres is a "Ruby Red Bag"?  Oh, it's <a href="http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/FCC-03-234A1.html">this.</a>  Check out the full list after the jump, and perhaps add your own colorful words in the comments!				<a href="http://gawker.com/397348/the-20-words-you-cant-say-on-cellphone-tv" title="Click here to read more about The 20 Words You Can't Say on Cellphone TV">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/397348/the-20-words-you-cant-say-on-cellphone-tv]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-397348]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[George Carlin]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[naughty, naughty]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Swears]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:48:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=397348&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Blogging Clichés That Must Die]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Blogging Clichés That Must Die" href="http://gawker.com/words/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">words</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Blogging Clichés That Must Die" href="http://gawker.com/365426/blogging-cliches-that-must-die" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Blogging Clichés That Must Die" alt="Click here to read Blogging Clichés That Must Die" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/03/small_burn-her-shes-a-blog.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Yes, there was one in the headline! Good job. Clichés are so tempting to bloggers because we have <i>so much great stuff to write</i> and we want to get it out right away. And using words like "internets" makes us feel like part of a superior in-crowd, even if that's a crowd that includes Adam Sandler. Gawker <a href="http://gawker.com/news/blogs/bad-lingo-blogmedia-clichs-222162.php">banned the worst phrases</a> over a year ago, but since then we've found much more. This time we're also adding <i>good</i> clichés, like "sad."				<a href="http://gawker.com/365426/blogging-cliches-that-must-die" title="Click here to read more about Blogging Clichés That Must Die">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/365426/blogging-cliches-that-must-die]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-365426]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Bloggers]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 07 Mar 2008 19:00:24 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick Douglas]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=365426&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Journos Excited by Long Words]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Journos Excited by Long Words" href="http://gawker.com/journalismism/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">journalismism</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Journos Excited by Long Words" href="http://gawker.com/362074/journos-excited-by-long-words" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Journos Excited by Long Words" alt="Click here to read Journos Excited by Long Words" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/02/small_bigwords-thumb.gif"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				There is a charming story that Malcolm Gladwell has told <i>over and over again</i> about how he used to try to <a href="http://gawker.com/358275/malcolm-gladwells-newspaper-daze">sneak funny phrases</a> into the newspaper he worked for, back when he was a journalist and not yet a personality. Turns out <i>everyone's</i> done it! Michael Scherer, currently with <i>Time</i>, explains that when he was working at an unnamed newspaper bureau in Easthampton, Mass, he and his "colleague" would try to sneak "obscure 10-dollar word[s]" into their copy. The best he ever did was "dun." But the dude who wrote noted Scrabble champion William F. Buckley's obit for the <i>Times</i> got his Roget's on and used "Sesquipedalian" in an A1 headline. <i>Jesus</i>, journalists need hobbies. What happened to drinking and fucking again? [<a href="http://www.time-blog.com/swampland/2008/02/nyt_a1_sesquipedalian.html">Swampland</a>]				<a href="http://gawker.com/362074/journos-excited-by-long-words" title="Click here to read more about Journos Excited by Long Words">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/362074/journos-excited-by-long-words]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-362074]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[journalismism]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[everything is old]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[games people play]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[William F. Buckley]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:56:51 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pareene]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=362074&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New Words Of 2007 Make Us Feel Old And Dumb (Or Smart)]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read New Words Of 2007 Make Us Feel Old And Dumb (Or Smart)" href="http://gawker.com/me-talk-pretty/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">metalkpretty</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read New Words Of 2007 Make Us Feel Old And Dumb (Or Smart)" href="http://gawker.com/337275/new-words-of-2007-make-us-feel-old-and-dumb-or-smart" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read New Words Of 2007 Make Us Feel Old And Dumb (Or Smart)" alt="Click here to read New Words Of 2007 Make Us Feel Old And Dumb (Or Smart)" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2007/12/small_23buzzwords.span.600.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				One reason getting older isn't so bad is that at the end of every year, one gets to watch as the <i>Times</i> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/23/weekinreview/23buzzwords.html?_r=1&8dpc&oref=slogin">trots out words coined in the year previous,</a> courtesy of <a href="http://gawker.com/news/grant-barrett/">Gawker pal</a> <a href="http://www.doubletongued.org/index.php/grantbarrett/">Grant Barrett</a>.  Who really can complain of an increased risk of prostate cancer, a few more wrinkles and a lack of stamina while words like "gorno" "life-stream" and "mobisode" made the passage of time worth it? On the other hand, none of these words mean what they sound like they mean. 				<a href="http://gawker.com/337275/new-words-of-2007-make-us-feel-old-and-dumb-or-smart" title="Click here to read more about New Words Of 2007 Make Us Feel Old And Dumb (Or Smart)">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/337275/new-words-of-2007-make-us-feel-old-and-dumb-or-smart]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-337275]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[me talk pretty]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Christmas teeth! Radiant brains! Apple deaf!]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Neologisms]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[neolojisms]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 24 Dec 2007 10:00:54 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Stein]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=337275&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[William Safire Takes On the Blacks, Rejects NYT Style Guide]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read William Safire Takes On the Blacks, Rejects NYT Style Guide" href="http://gawker.com/making-a-statement/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">makingastatement</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read William Safire Takes On the Blacks, Rejects NYT Style Guide" href="http://gawker.com/261897/william-safire-takes-on-the-blacks-rejects-nyt-style-guide" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read William Safire Takes On the Blacks, Rejects NYT Style Guide" alt="Click here to read William Safire Takes On the Blacks, Rejects NYT Style Guide" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2007/05/small_Safire.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				In tomorrow's "On Language" column (not yet online), the linguist William Safire concludes that "In borrowing, as speakers of Standard English do, cool words and phrases from hip-hop and rap ('You the man!' 'You go, girl!'), we should recognize the savvy sociopolitical methods behind its dialectical formulations." Which is to say, those people/rappers are not just making random sounds after all. What brought about this revelation? An e-mail from an English professor at Florida Gulf Coast University, who thought it was pretty funny that her students were using phrases like "back in the day" and "old school" in reference to things like the first-generation iPod. Intrigued, Safire took the ball and ran it all the way down, tapping not one, not two, but three "serious students of hip-hopese" to explain the phenomenon.				<a href="http://gawker.com/261897/william-safire-takes-on-the-blacks-rejects-nyt-style-guide" title="Click here to read more about William Safire Takes On the Blacks, Rejects NYT Style Guide">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/261897/william-safire-takes-on-the-blacks-rejects-nyt-style-guide]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-261897]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[making a statement]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[William Safire]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[words as power]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 19 May 2007 17:11:25 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[lneyfakh]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=261897&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

