<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gawker: Wwd]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gawker.com/tag/wwd</link>
		<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://gawker.superfeedr.com/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" />
		<description><![CDATA[Gawker posts tagged Wwd]]></description>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Faux Charity Fashion's Night Out Only Raised Imaginary Money]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Faux Charity Fashion's Night Out Only Raised Imaginary Money" href="http://gawker.com/plots/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">plots</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Faux Charity Fashion's Night Out Only Raised Imaginary Money" href="http://gawker.com/5359020/faux-charity-fashions-night-out-only-raised-imaginary-money" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Faux Charity Fashion's Night Out Only Raised Imaginary Money" alt="Click here to read Faux Charity Fashion's Night Out Only Raised Imaginary Money" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2009/09/FNO.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Girl, we're <a href="http://gawker.com/5356940/stalking-anna-wintour-a-fashions-night-out-scrapbook/gallery/">still in recovery</a> from <a href="http://gawker.com/5357712/after-fashions-night-out-an-open-letter-to-mary+kate-olsen/gallery/">Fashion's Night Out</a>. Too bad the charitable arm of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged ANNA WINTOUR" title="Click here to read more posts tagged ANNA WINTOUR" href="http://gawker.com/tag/anna-wintour/">Anna Wintour</a>'s Make-People-Like-Me Tour 2009 didn't translate into cash for retailers. But nobody cares because the party was <em>that</em> fierce.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5359020/faux-charity-fashions-night-out-only-raised-imaginary-money" title="Click here to read more about Faux Charity Fashion's Night Out Only Raised Imaginary Money">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5359020/faux-charity-fashions-night-out-only-raised-imaginary-money]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5359020]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[plots]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Andre Leon Talley]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Anna Wintour]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Barbara Walters]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Bette Midler]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Brooks Brothers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Claudio del vecchio]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fashion's night out]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Oscar de la Renta]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Sarah Jessica Parker]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wwd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:21:23 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Moylan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5359020&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Barbara Corcoran, Classic New York Broad]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Barbara Corcoran, Classic New York Broad" href="http://gawker.com/lady-moguls/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">ladymoguls</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Barbara Corcoran, Classic New York Broad" href="http://gawker.com/5311619/barbara-corcoran-classic-new-york-broad" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Barbara Corcoran, Classic New York Broad" alt="Click here to read Barbara Corcoran, Classic New York Broad" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2009/07/custom_1247217123485_BlueShirt.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged BARBARA CORCORAN" title="Click here to read more posts tagged BARBARA CORCORAN" href="http://gawker.com/tag/barbara-corcoran/">Barbara Corcoran</a>, founder of the Corcoran Group and the <em>Today Show</em>'s resident <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged REAL ESTATE" title="Click here to read more posts tagged REAL ESTATE" href="http://gawker.com/tag/real-estate/">real estate</a> expert person, is sort of a living legend in New York. Everyone knows her name. But do you know the secret to her success? Dick jokes!				<a href="http://gawker.com/5311619/barbara-corcoran-classic-new-york-broad" title="Click here to read more about Barbara Corcoran, Classic New York Broad">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5311619/barbara-corcoran-classic-new-york-broad]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5311619]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Lady moguls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Barbara Corcoran]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Mrs. robinson crushes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Women's Wear Daily]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wwd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 10 Jul 2009 05:24:57 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Cajun Boy]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5311619&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Women's Wear Daily Horns In On Our Dirty Headlines]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read &lt;i&gt;Women's Wear Daily&lt;/i&gt; Horns In On Our Dirty Headlines" href="http://gawker.com/wwd/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">wwd</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read &lt;i&gt;Women's Wear Daily&lt;/i&gt; Horns In On Our Dirty Headlines" href="http://gawker.com/5102174/womens-wear-daily-horns-in-on-our-dirty-headlines" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read &lt;i&gt;Women's Wear Daily&lt;/i&gt; Horns In On Our Dirty Headlines" alt="Click here to read &lt;i&gt;Women's Wear Daily&lt;/i&gt; Horns In On Our Dirty Headlines" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/12/blyethespirit.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				 "Hey, why should Gawker be the only ones to use inappropriate and suggestive headlines? We can do it, too!" [<a href="http://www.wwd.com/lifestyle-news/eye/blythe-danner-gives-oral-1878717?src=rss/recentstories/20081204">WWD</a>]				<a href="http://gawker.com/5102174/womens-wear-daily-horns-in-on-our-dirty-headlines" title="Click here to read more about Women's Wear Daily Horns In On Our Dirty Headlines">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5102174/womens-wear-daily-horns-in-on-our-dirty-headlines]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5102174]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Wwd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 04 Dec 2008 18:47:23 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheila]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5102174&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Conde Nast Folds DNR]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Conde Nast Folds &lt;em&gt;DNR&lt;/em&gt;" href="http://gawker.com/great-magazine-die_off/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">greatmagazinedieoff</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Conde Nast Folds &lt;em&gt;DNR&lt;/em&gt;" href="http://gawker.com/5095103/conde-nast-folds-dnr" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Conde Nast Folds &lt;em&gt;DNR&lt;/em&gt;" alt="Click here to read Conde Nast Folds &lt;em&gt;DNR&lt;/em&gt;" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/11/dnr.jpeg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Conde Nast is folding <em>DNR</em>, the men's fashion trade magazine. It's also shuttering its website, <a href="http://www.dnrnews.com/site/index.php">DNRNews.com</a>. The feeble spin is that <em>WWD</em> will pick up the slack by launching "comprehensive, round-the-clock men’s fashion and retail coverage." [#2 of the <a href="">four ways to kill a magazine</a>, for those keeping track]. Points to the PR department for attempting to create an upside. But it's clear that this is evidence of weakness in the fashion category specifically, and more momentum for the scary Great Magazine Die-off in general. The company hasn't announced how many layoffs will go along with <em>DNR</em>'s death, but departing staffers with more details can <a href="mailto:tips@gawker.com">email us</a>.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5095103/conde-nast-folds-dnr" title="Click here to read more about Conde Nast Folds DNR">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5095103/conde-nast-folds-dnr]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5095103]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Great magazine die-off]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Conde Nast]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[DNR]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wwd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:24:27 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5095103&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[WWD Staff In Uproar Over Being Made To Write Advertorial Fluff]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;WWD&lt;/em&gt; Staff In Uproar Over Being Made To Write Advertorial Fluff" href="http://gawker.com/wwd/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">wwd</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;WWD&lt;/em&gt; Staff In Uproar Over Being Made To Write Advertorial Fluff" href="http://gawker.com/5046124/wwd-staff-in-uproar-over-being-made-to-write-advertorial-fluff" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;WWD&lt;/em&gt; Staff In Uproar Over Being Made To Write Advertorial Fluff" alt="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;WWD&lt;/em&gt; Staff In Uproar Over Being Made To Write Advertorial Fluff" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/09/wwd2.jpeg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				"Fashion Rocks" is Conde Nast's big advertorial extravaganza pegged to Fashion Week, when the magazine company can sell extra ad space to all its fashion advertisers in a fluffy, profile-heavy special supplements. But we hear that the staff of the Conde-owned <em>WWD </em>is currently embroiled in a mini-revolt, after they were ordered to write the copy for the 48-page Fashion Rocks supplement that went out with yesterday's issue. There's no reason an editorial staff should ever be made to write advertorial copy. The most egregious line-crossing of all: a full-page interview in the supplement with Richard Beckman, Conde Nast's <em>own</em> head of marketing.				<a href="http://gawker.com/5046124/wwd-staff-in-uproar-over-being-made-to-write-advertorial-fluff" title="Click here to read more about WWD Staff In Uproar Over Being Made To Write Advertorial Fluff">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5046124/wwd-staff-in-uproar-over-being-made-to-write-advertorial-fluff]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5046124]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Wwd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Chinese wall]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Conde Nast]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fashion rocks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:42:05 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5046124&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Corrections Of The Week: Stalkers, Affairs And WWD]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Corrections Of The Week: Stalkers, Affairs And &lt;i&gt;WWD&lt;/i&gt;" href="http://gawker.com/oops/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">oops</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Corrections Of The Week: Stalkers, Affairs And &lt;i&gt;WWD&lt;/i&gt;" href="http://gawker.com/5002795/corrections-of-the-week-stalkers-affairs-and-wwd" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Corrections Of The Week: Stalkers, Affairs And &lt;i&gt;WWD&lt;/i&gt;" alt="Click here to read Corrections Of The Week: Stalkers, Affairs And &lt;i&gt;WWD&lt;/i&gt;" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/02/ba/c7/small_bac75612553be2ce5513a43e0dfa257b.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<a href="http://gawker.com/assets/images/gawker/2008/02/sosorry.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://gawker.com/assets/images/gawker/2008/02/sosorry.jpg','popup','width=140,height=133,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"></a> The unfortunate forgot-you-were-dead <em>San Antonio Express-News</em> wasn't the only one <a href="http://gawker.com/tag/san-antonio-express_news/">screwing up</a> this week. 				<a href="http://gawker.com/5002795/corrections-of-the-week-stalkers-affairs-and-wwd" title="Click here to read more about Corrections Of The Week: Stalkers, Affairs And WWD">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5002795/corrections-of-the-week-stalkers-affairs-and-wwd]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5002795]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Oops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Corrections of the week]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dana thomas]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wwd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 01 Feb 2008 17:06:56 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maggie]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5002795&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA['Portfolio' Snags 'Newsweek' Fashion Guru, MemoPad Gets Confused]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read 'Portfolio' Snags 'Newsweek' Fashion Guru, MemoPad Gets Confused" href="http://gawker.com/dana-thomas/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">danathomas</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read 'Portfolio' Snags 'Newsweek' Fashion Guru, MemoPad Gets Confused" href="http://gawker.com/350600/portfolio-snags-newsweek-fashion-guru-memopad-gets-confused" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read 'Portfolio' Snags 'Newsweek' Fashion Guru, MemoPad Gets Confused" alt="Click here to read 'Portfolio' Snags 'Newsweek' Fashion Guru, MemoPad Gets Confused" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2011/11/small_2d37601ba51a2d9a943908a5dc103c70.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				 In yet another example of <em>Portfolio's</em> tossing around their coin, the flagging Conde Nast title has now snagged Dana Thomas, the Paris-based <em>Newsweek</em> fashion correspondent. Thomas is the author of <em>Deluxe,</em> an inside look at the decline of the luxury brand, the bestseller of which <a href="http://gawker.com/news/deluxe/">we were big fans</a>. We're guessing Thomas herself wasn't a huge fan of the errors in the<em> WWD </em><a href="http://www.wwd.com/search/article/121895?page=1&amp;query=dana+thomas">MemoPad</a> item about her big move today. Her upcoming book tour is headed to Australia, not Argentina, and if luxury execs have complained about the book's inaccuracies, they're only talking to <em>WWD.</em>				<a href="http://gawker.com/350600/portfolio-snags-newsweek-fashion-guru-memopad-gets-confused" title="Click here to read more about 'Portfolio' Snags 'Newsweek' Fashion Guru, MemoPad Gets Confused">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/350600/portfolio-snags-newsweek-fashion-guru-memopad-gets-confused]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-350600]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[dana thomas]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[memopad]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Mistakes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Portfolio]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wwd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:08:16 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maggie]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=350600&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Fibby 'Interview' Flack Says Editor Sischy Is Quitting After All]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Fibby 'Interview' Flack Says Editor Sischy Is Quitting After All" href="http://gawker.com/spinmeisters/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">spinmeisters</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Fibby 'Interview' Flack Says Editor Sischy Is Quitting After All" href="http://gawker.com/5002521/fibby-interview-flack-says-editor-sischy-is-quitting-after-all" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Fibby 'Interview' Flack Says Editor Sischy Is Quitting After All" alt="Click here to read Fibby 'Interview' Flack Says Editor Sischy Is Quitting After All" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/01/82/a1/small_82a144352b9415a7889faf59a808b782.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				
 WWD is reporting that editor Ingrid Sischy is leaving Interview magazine. Funny that, because 14 days ago, when we <a href="http://gawker.com/5002150/longtime-interview-editor-ingrid-sischy-out-at-magazine">reported the rumor</a> that Sischy was on her way out, whopper-master and Interview spokeslady Rachna Shah said this to the Observer: "The Gawker item is absolutely not true." WWD got a tetch hissy with us via email. "You guys jumped the gun on that," they wrote. Goodness. WWD's <a href="http://www.wwd.com/issue/article/today/121741?page=0">long piece</a> today on Sischy's life and times at Andy Warhol's Interview doesn't mention their original story. To be fair, it's possible that Shah's bosses might have given the flack false information. Not uncommon, but always uncommonly silly. Whoops! The renowned Sischy is leaving the paper after a 23-year tenure, citing partner Sandra Brant's decision to sell her interest in Brant Publications, Interview's parent company. After the jump, Interview's press release on Sischy's departure. At least, that's what we think it is. <strong>UPDATE:</strong> From a partner at consulting firm HLGroup: "Neither the client nor the publicist involved passed on incorrect information. When the question was asked 14 days ago, Ingrid Sischy was in fact on holiday in South Africa. She had not resigned, nor was her intention at that time to resign."
				<a href="http://gawker.com/5002521/fibby-interview-flack-says-editor-sischy-is-quitting-after-all" title="Click here to read more about Fibby 'Interview' Flack Says Editor Sischy Is Quitting After All">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5002521/fibby-interview-flack-says-editor-sischy-is-quitting-after-all]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5002521]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Spinmeisters]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Ingrid Sischy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Interview]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Stephanie smith]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[working 'with' the press]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wwd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:27:37 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maggie]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5002521&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Harper's Bazaar Pictures Of Hillary Clinton In A Fancy Frock]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read The Harper's Bazaar Pictures Of Hillary Clinton In A Fancy Frock" href="http://gawker.com/campaign-2008/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">campaign2008</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read The Harper's Bazaar Pictures Of Hillary Clinton In A Fancy Frock" href="http://gawker.com/348047/the-harpers-bazaar-pictures-of-hillary-clinton-in-a-fancy-frock" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read The Harper's Bazaar Pictures Of Hillary Clinton In A Fancy Frock" alt="Click here to read The Harper's Bazaar Pictures Of Hillary Clinton In A Fancy Frock" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/01/small_hbhill copy 1.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				 Before Hillary Clinton showed us that she really <em>does</em> wear her heart on her sleeve (and it's a ladylike sleeve!) she backed out of a <em>Vogue</em> photo shoot because she was afraid of looking too feminine. Editor Anna Wintour was <em><a href="http://wwd.com/memopad/article/121588">irked</a></em><em>. </em>But the Democratic candidate is featured in a February issue of Harper's Bazaar, along with six of the other running candidates. She is not, <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2008/01/hillary_clinton_is_going_to_ge.html"> despite earlier reports</a>, wearing a miniskirt and heels.  After the jump, see the pictures of Clinton in all her high couture glory.				<a href="http://gawker.com/348047/the-harpers-bazaar-pictures-of-hillary-clinton-in-a-fancy-frock" title="Click here to read more about The Harper's Bazaar Pictures Of Hillary Clinton In A Fancy Frock">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/348047/the-harpers-bazaar-pictures-of-hillary-clinton-in-a-fancy-frock]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-348047]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[campaign 2008]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Anna Wintour]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Harper's Bazaar]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[image]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Vogue]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wonkette]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wwd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:50:24 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maggie]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=348047&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Panty-Clad Anna Wintour!]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Panty-Clad Anna Wintour!" href="http://gawker.com/naked-fashion-editors/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">nakedfashioneditors</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Panty-Clad Anna Wintour!" href="http://gawker.com/330740/panty+clad-anna-wintour" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Panty-Clad Anna Wintour!" alt="Click here to read Panty-Clad Anna Wintour!" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2007/12/small_anna wintour stardoll.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<a href="http://wwd.com/memopad/article/120728?page=1">WWD notes</a> that <a href="http://www.stardoll.com/en/">Stardolls</a> has added a <i>Vogue</i> editor Anna Wintour doll to their digital collection&mdash;and Jeff Bercovici at <i>Portfolio</i> notes that she is basically naked. We are going to be Photoshopping outfits on her ALL DAY LONG. (Wintour's doll is much prettier than <a href="http://gawker.com/news/polls/stardolls-poll-results-and-fabulous-prizes-revealed-235411.php">Perez's</a>!)				<a href="http://gawker.com/330740/panty+clad-anna-wintour" title="Click here to read more about Panty-Clad Anna Wintour!">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/330740/panty+clad-anna-wintour]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-330740]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[naked fashion editors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Anna Wintour]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Photoshop]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Portfolio]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[stardolls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Vogue]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wwd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 06 Dec 2007 10:25:15 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Choire]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=330740&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[
Reporter Jeff Bercovici, who got his start...]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
									</div>
				Reporter Jeff Bercovici, who got his start (as far as we're concerned!) at <i>WWD</i>, is leaving <i>Radar</i> for... wait for it... <i>Portfolio</i>! To BLOG. Enjoy blogging, blogsy! Blog it up! Though he'll stay at <i>Radar</i> as a contributing editor.				<a href="http://gawker.com/283406/" title="Click here to read more about 
Reporter Jeff Bercovici, who got his start...">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/283406/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-283406]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[on reporting]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Jeff Bercovici]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Portfolio]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Radar]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wwd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 27 Jul 2007 15:41:31 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Choire]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=283406&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[
You've got to hand it to the Post: Buried...]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
									</div>
				You've got to hand it to the <i>Post</i>: Buried at the bottom of this item about Marc Jacobs (who, we're told, once was some kind of designer or something?) is this classic disclaimer: "We didn't call Jacobs for comment because the last time we did, his rep leaked the story to <i>WWD</i>." [<A href=http://www.nypost.com/seven/07262007/gossip/pagesix/unquiet_envy_pagesix_.htm>NYP</a>]				<a href="http://gawker.com/282653/" title="Click here to read more about 
You've got to hand it to the Post: Buried...">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/282653/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-282653]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[don't mess with page six]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Marc Jacobs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Page Six]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wwd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 26 Jul 2007 09:23:51 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[abalk]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=282653&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA['WWD' Stands By Story, Won't Run It Again]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read 'WWD' Stands By Story, Won't Run It Again" href="http://gawker.com/feuds/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">feuds</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read 'WWD' Stands By Story, Won't Run It Again" href="http://gawker.com/279619/wwd-stands-by-story-wont-run-it-again" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read 'WWD' Stands By Story, Won't Run It Again" alt="Click here to read 'WWD' Stands By Story, Won't Run It Again" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2007/07/small_SP32-20070718-070706.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				This editor's note concerning a recent Jacob Bernstein profile of Hollywood gossip Nikki Finkke ran in today's <i>Women's Wear Daily</i>. According to Keith Kelly, <i>WWD</i> won't repost the story because "there is a legal question about whether one blanket 'yes you can tape [the conversation]' covered all subsequent follow-up interviews." Our immediate reaction was <i>on what planet</i>? But the planet is California. So we guess it's a cautionary tale for New Yorkers interviewing Californians. Or anyone interviewing Nikki Finke. <b>Update</b>: The whole story <a href="http://www.mcnblogs.com/thehotblog/archives/2007/07/twice_the_crazy.html#more">is online elsewhere</a>.				<a href="http://gawker.com/279619/wwd-stands-by-story-wont-run-it-again" title="Click here to read more about 'WWD' Stands By Story, Won't Run It Again">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/279619/wwd-stands-by-story-wont-run-it-again]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-279619]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Feuds]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Jacob Bernstein]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Nikki Finke]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wwd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Jul 2007 10:00:08 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[abalk]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=279619&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Us Weekly's Brand Is Truth]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Us Weekly's Brand Is Truth" href="http://gawker.com/tabloid-media/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">tabloidmedia</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Us Weekly's Brand Is Truth" href="http://gawker.com/257733/us-weeklys-brand-is-truth" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Us Weekly's Brand Is Truth" alt="Click here to read Us Weekly's Brand Is Truth" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2007/05/small_vinceproposes.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				A two-page spread in this week's <em>Us Weekly</em> calling out other magazines for fabricating stories has their competitors scoffing. "I find it amusing that <em>Us Weekly</em> and [editor in chief] Janice Min thinks they are above all else in the celebrity category of weekly gossip magazines. How can she point fingers when Page Six had to run a retraction from picking up her stories in the last year?" a <em>Star</em> spokesman asked <em>WWD</em> today. "We don't say that we don't make mistakes; that is the nature of any news gathering operation. What we don't do is wholesale fabricate stories to sell magazines," a Wenner spokesman responded.  No, never! But fabricating controversy is another story, apparently, as a peek at the 2-page spread in question, headlined "Creative Writing: All The News That's Fake!" reveals. 				<a href="http://gawker.com/257733/us-weeklys-brand-is-truth" title="Click here to read more about Us Weekly's Brand Is Truth">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/257733/us-weeklys-brand-is-truth]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-257733]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[tabloid media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[glass houses]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Lies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Us Weekly]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wwd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 04 May 2007 11:00:20 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emily Gould]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=257733&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Does Cindy Adams Hate Rupert Murdoch?]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Does Cindy Adams Hate Rupert Murdoch?" href="http://gawker.com/cindy-adams/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">cindyadams</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Does Cindy Adams Hate Rupert Murdoch?" href="http://gawker.com/254772/does-cindy-adams-hate-rupert-murdoch" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Does Cindy Adams Hate Rupert Murdoch?" alt="Click here to read Does Cindy Adams Hate Rupert Murdoch?" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2007/04/small_cindysweater.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Rosie O'Donnell's raunchy emceeing had the ladies at the N.Y. Women in Communications luncheon hiding under their tables in homophobic, offended shame!  Either that, or she had everyone in stitches. It depends whether you ask Richard Johnson or Cindy Adams.  The Page Six overlord made sure to mention the "17 sweet-faced high school girls who won scholarships to pursue their dreams of careers in media," whose virgin ears were ostensibly traumatized when Rosie "concluded a rant about Donald Trump by grabbing her crotch and shouting, 'Eat me!'" But his gossiping colleague Cindy had a different take: "In elegant clothes instead of her usual sweatshirt, newly smart-looking Rosie O'Donnell emceed. Hilarious."  How to make sense of it all?  Well, WWD mentions that "emcee Rosie O'Donnell skewer[ed] Rupert Murdoch, who presented an award to Cindy Adams, and the <em>New York Post </em>at every opportunity." Hot! Cindy Adams is a dangerous dissident trying to take down the <em>Post </em>from within! <span class = "byline">&mdash;Emily</span>				<a href="http://gawker.com/254772/does-cindy-adams-hate-rupert-murdoch" title="Click here to read more about Does Cindy Adams Hate Rupert Murdoch?">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/254772/does-cindy-adams-hate-rupert-murdoch]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-254772]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Cindy Adams]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[New York Post]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Page Six]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Richard Johnson]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Rosie O'Donnell]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wwd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:01:20 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emily Gould]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=254772&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Marc Jacobs Back In Rehab]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Marc Jacobs Back In Rehab" href="http://gawker.com/marc-jacobs/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">marcjacobs</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Marc Jacobs Back In Rehab" href="http://gawker.com/243573/marc-jacobs-back-in-rehab" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Marc Jacobs Back In Rehab" alt="Click here to read Marc Jacobs Back In Rehab" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2007/03/small_marc.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				 Designer and tastemaker Marc Jacobs flew directly to a drug and alcohol rehabilitation facility in Arizona the day after showing his Louis Vuitton collection in Paris, <em>WWD</em> reports.  "Marc made the right decision," said Jacobs' longtime business partner Robert Duffy "He'd been sober for seven years. When he relapsed, he wanted to deal with it right away ... Obviously, our prayers are with him."  "Great, now the bags are going to be even more expensive," a stylish friend of ours ... um, prayed.  				<a href="http://gawker.com/243573/marc-jacobs-back-in-rehab" title="Click here to read more about Marc Jacobs Back In Rehab">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/243573/marc-jacobs-back-in-rehab]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-243573]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Marc Jacobs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wwd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:48:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emily Gould]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=243573&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Bill Keller Explains His New Passion For Fashion]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Bill Keller Explains His New Passion For Fashion" href="http://gawker.com/wwd/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">wwd</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Bill Keller Explains His New Passion For Fashion" href="http://gawker.com/240681/bill-keller-explains-his-new-passion-for-fashion" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Bill Keller Explains His New Passion For Fashion" alt="Click here to read Bill Keller Explains His New Passion For Fashion" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2007/03/small_billkeller.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				 Okay, so <em>Times</em> executive editor Bill Keller doesn't <em>really</em> <a href="http://gawker.com/news/bill-keller/stylecom-snubs-bill-keller-240385.php">fetishize Nicolas Ghesqui

re's inventive prints</a>. "I'm a fan of blue jeans and T-shirts," he told WWD yesterday.  So what was he doing in the front row at Balenciaga?  Something to do with "a new level of editorial marketing amid stiff competition for readers and ad dollars," WWD surmises. Keller addressed <i>Times</i> critic Cathy Horyn's recent banning from Dolce & Gabbana (and her rumored <a href="http://www.wwd.com/memopad/article/113327">pending ban from Vera Wang</a>): "I always think that's self-defeating when they shut out the journalists." Well put, sir!  He'll be wearing a deconstructed feathered corset by the end of the week, we just know it. This is just like his Baghdad tour, only less dangerous!				<a href="http://gawker.com/240681/bill-keller-explains-his-new-passion-for-fashion" title="Click here to read more about Bill Keller Explains His New Passion For Fashion">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/240681/bill-keller-explains-his-new-passion-for-fashion]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-240681]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Wwd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Bill Keller]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[style.com]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 01 Mar 2007 11:25:42 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emily Gould]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=240681&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Gillian Hearst-Shaw Is Nepotastic!]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Gillian Hearst-Shaw Is Nepotastic!" href="http://gawker.com/gillian-hearst_shaw/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">gillianhearstshaw</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Gillian Hearst-Shaw Is Nepotastic!" href="http://gawker.com/239145/gillian-hearst+shaw-is-nepotastic" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Gillian Hearst-Shaw Is Nepotastic!" alt="Click here to read Gillian Hearst-Shaw Is Nepotastic!" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2007/02/small_gillianhearstshaw.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				 What do you do when your <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lydia_Hearst">sister</a> got all the model-pretty genes and your <a href="http://www.gawker.com/news/melissa-berkelhammer/debutard-derby-social-reality-show-213317.php">'socialite' reality show </a>never got produced?  Well, if you're Gillian Hearst-Shaw, you go into the family business.  According to WWD, the socialite has been "quietly working" as an editorial assistant at Town & Country's semiannual wedding and quarterly travel magazines&mdash;her family has an ownership stake in, natch&mdash;since early January. "Not only do I get to learn and work, I also get to learn and work at a family company," Hearst-Shaw cooed to WWD.  But will her assistanting duties get in the way of her wedding plans?  (Hearst was given a "blindingly huge diamond engagement ring" last weekend in the Berkshires by her lawyer boyfriend Christian Simonds).  We hope not! She tells WWD that charges of nepotism just make her want to "work that much harder" to prove that she deserves her job.  You go, girl!				<a href="http://gawker.com/239145/gillian-hearst+shaw-is-nepotastic" title="Click here to read more about Gillian Hearst-Shaw Is Nepotastic!">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/239145/gillian-hearst+shaw-is-nepotastic]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-239145]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gillian hearst-shaw]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Socialites]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wwd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:20:35 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emily Gould]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=239145&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA['Stuff' Lagerfeld Joke Offends Chunkies, Cat People]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read 'Stuff' Lagerfeld Joke Offends Chunkies, Cat People" href="http://gawker.com/karl-lagerfeld/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">karllagerfeld</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read 'Stuff' Lagerfeld Joke Offends Chunkies, Cat People" href="http://gawker.com/236956/stuff-lagerfeld-joke-offends-chunkies-cat-people" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read 'Stuff' Lagerfeld Joke Offends Chunkies, Cat People" alt="Click here to read 'Stuff' Lagerfeld Joke Offends Chunkies, Cat People" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2007/02/small_karlskinny.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Newish <em>Stuff</em> editor Dan Bova's first editor's letter is a sendup of Chanel designer/vampire-grampy Karl Lagerfeld. According to WWD, Bova "wrote the editor's letter of his first full issue in the supposed voice of Karl Lagerfeld, focusing mostly on what Bova fabricates is the designer's taste for eating cats."  We suppose this is what Dan is getting at when he says that Stuff is making a "concerted effort to go upscale," but we're unconvinced. We're talking about the author of the <a href="http://www.powerhousebooks.com/titless05/karllagerfelddiet.html">Karl Lagerfeld Diet </a>here, the man who <a href="http://nymag.com/fashion/06/spring/15746/index1.html">once said</a> that his "only ambition in life" is to fit into size 28 jeans.  You think he'd really be caught dead ingesting a calorie-crammed, full-fat feline?				<a href="http://gawker.com/236956/stuff-lagerfeld-joke-offends-chunkies-cat-people" title="Click here to read more about 'Stuff' Lagerfeld Joke Offends Chunkies, Cat People">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/236956/stuff-lagerfeld-joke-offends-chunkies-cat-people]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-236956]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Karl Lagerfeld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dan bova]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Stuff]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wwd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 15 Feb 2007 11:42:55 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emily Gould]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=236956&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[How Is This Socialite Different From All Other Socialites?]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read How Is This Socialite Different From All Other Socialites?" href="http://gawker.com/claire-bernard/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">clairebernard</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read How Is This Socialite Different From All Other Socialites?" href="http://gawker.com/233626/how-is-this-socialite-different-from-all-other-socialites" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read How Is This Socialite Different From All Other Socialites?" alt="Click here to read How Is This Socialite Different From All Other Socialites?" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2007/02/small_claire bernard.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Our feverish excitement about Fash Week has led us to peek into some darker nooks and crannies of the internet than usual; here's a nugget we turned up about socialite Claire Bernard, who mingled with <a href="http://gawker.com/news/tinsley-mortimer/today-in-tinz-still-rocking-the-sally-hansen-nails-at-fash-week-bash-233552.php">the 'Tinz</a> et al at that One Scottsdale/Vogue Italia party last night. <blockquote> Meanwhile, One Scottsdale, the latest luxury mega-mall, celebrated Fashion Week far from its Arizona home&mdash;like any good tourist&mdash;with drinks at Amy Sacco's Bette. Amongst the crowd, co-hosts Tinsley Mortimer and Theodora Richards greeted friends like Annie Churchill and Claire Bernard (taking a night off from doing homework for her MFA at Columbia).</blockquote>  We flipped through the <a href="https://directory.columbia.edu/people/search?filter.searchTerm=claire%20bernard">student directory</a>, and sure enough, Claire's on her way to becoming a bona fide Writer with a capital W!  We can only hope that she'll heed Cary Tennis's words of wisdom, and not rely on her writing to support her.				<a href="http://gawker.com/233626/how-is-this-socialite-different-from-all-other-socialites" title="Click here to read more about How Is This Socialite Different From All Other Socialites?">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/233626/how-is-this-socialite-different-from-all-other-socialites]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-233626]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[claire bernard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Columbia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fashion Week]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mfa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wwd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 02 Feb 2007 16:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emily Gould]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=233626&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Get Ready To Look At The Look Book Book]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Get Ready To Look At The Look Book Book" href="http://gawker.com/wwd/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">wwd</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Get Ready To Look At The Look Book Book" href="http://gawker.com/231791/get-ready-to-look-at-the-look-book-book" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Get Ready To Look At The Look Book Book" alt="Click here to read Get Ready To Look At The Look Book Book" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2007/01/gypsy.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				  Well, this is the best news we've heard from <em>WWD</em> since . . . well, since the item before it, about how Jessica Joffe was picked to star in new Uniqlo ads because they're all about "interesting, creative people not changed by the media."  Annnyway, they also report that <em>New York Magazine'</em>s cherished Look Book feature is soon going to be transmuted into a collectible coffee-table book that we can all own!  But what will differentiate the Look Book Book from, you know, the Look Book? <blockquote>A spokeswoman said the book would offer"many of our best-loved 'Look Bookers,' many new faces, plus quite a few never-before-published detail shots of both." Amy Larocca's interviews will be in the mix, as well as stories of what happened to interviewees after they appeared in the magazine. </blockquote>  Finally, we'll learn where Mica de Jesus's family parks their gypsy caravan!  				<a href="http://gawker.com/231791/get-ready-to-look-at-the-look-book-book" title="Click here to read more about Get Ready To Look At The Look Book Book">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/231791/get-ready-to-look-at-the-look-book-book]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-231791]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Wwd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gypsies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Looking At The Look Book]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[New York Magazine]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:50:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emily Gould]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=231791&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[David Remnick Thought Dries Van Noten's Parka Dresses Were "Bo-ring!"]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read David Remnick Thought Dries Van Noten's Parka Dresses Were &quot;Bo-ring!&quot;" href="http://gawker.com/david-remnick/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">davidremnick</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read David Remnick Thought Dries Van Noten's Parka Dresses Were &quot;Bo-ring!&quot;" href="http://gawker.com/229610/david-remnick-thought-dries-van-notens-parka-dresses-were-bo+ring" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read David Remnick Thought Dries Van Noten's Parka Dresses Were &quot;Bo-ring!&quot;" alt="Click here to read David Remnick Thought Dries Van Noten's Parka Dresses Were &quot;Bo-ring!&quot;" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2007/01/small_david remnick.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				 Today we learn, via <em>WWD</em>, that <em>New Yorker</em> editor David Remnick has a softer side. It's very soft.  One might say it's made of a combination of tulle, peau de soie, and the gently-worn edges of a massive pile of ad dollars:  just in time for Paris fashion week, Remnick has "suddenly  . . . found a love of fashion."  In a move that an "insider" calls "a little odd," he's throwing a massive Nast-funded shindig on Monday to laud the arrival of new fashion editor Susan Morrison.  The quotes Remnick gave WWD did seem uncharacteristically bouncy: <blockquote>It's a meet-and-greet, and I think a lot of those people don't know me at all or the magazine as much as I'd like. It's something I've never done before. I thought it would be a fun and interesting trip to make." He's also going to check out a "bunch of shows" during his Sunday-through-Wednesday jaunt.</blockquote>  Also, of an upcoming New Yorker conference: <blockquote>It's not an opportunity for ceo X to talk about the ceo's company and give an annual report of their company. Bo-ring!</blockquote> We're finding the new fashionista David kind of endearing, actually.  				<a href="http://gawker.com/229610/david-remnick-thought-dries-van-notens-parka-dresses-were-bo+ring" title="Click here to read more about David Remnick Thought Dries Van Noten's Parka Dresses Were "Bo-ring!"">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/229610/david-remnick-thought-dries-van-notens-parka-dresses-were-bo+ring]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-229610]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[David Remnick]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[The New Yorker]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wwd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 18 Jan 2007 10:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emily Gould]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=229610&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Olsen Twin Tells: Distinguishing MK From A]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Olsen Twin Tells: Distinguishing MK From A" href="http://gawker.com/star/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">star</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Olsen Twin Tells: Distinguishing MK From A" href="http://gawker.com/225510/olsen-twin-tells-distinguishing-mk-from-a" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Olsen Twin Tells: Distinguishing MK From A" alt="Click here to read Olsen Twin Tells: Distinguishing MK From A" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2007/01/small_mk or a.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				We enjoyed <em>Star</em>'s cover story on Mary Kate Olsen's reanorexia as much as or possibly more than most people &mdash; "HER EATING COACH IS GONE" is a great name for a post-hardcore band, by the way &mdash; but we couldn't help but notice that some of the pictures of "Mary Kate" looked suspiciously full-bodied and &mdash; how to put this? &mdash; differently nosejobbed than the others.   Today, WWD confirmed our suspicions: according to their publicist, the twin in at least one of the pictures is indeed Ashley, not Mary Kate.  We guess those tricky twins confuse the <em>Star</em> photo department by periodically switching off haircolors, but we rely on other clues to distinguish one from the other.  We thought we'd help out the <em>Star</em> photo editors with a handy list of our personal Olsen twin "tells" &mdash; subtle clues that reliably determine which platform-booted, layered-looked lady is the rexy twin and which is the relatively healthy-looking fraternal counterpart. 				<a href="http://gawker.com/225510/olsen-twin-tells-distinguishing-mk-from-a" title="Click here to read more about Olsen Twin Tells: Distinguishing MK From A">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/225510/olsen-twin-tells-distinguishing-mk-from-a]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-225510]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Star]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Ashley Olsen]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mary kate olsen]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wwd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 02 Jan 2007 18:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emily Gould]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=225510&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Media Bubble: All The Critics Love U In New York]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Media Bubble: All The Critics Love U In New York" href="http://gawker.com/prince/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">prince</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Media Bubble: All The Critics Love U In New York" href="http://gawker.com/225009/media-bubble-all-the-critics-love-u-in-new-york" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Media Bubble: All The Critics Love U In New York" alt="Click here to read Media Bubble: All The Critics Love U In New York" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2006/12/small_prince.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<li>The artist currently known as Prince is "in talks to develop a musically themed magazine." We can't w8 2 read it!  [<a href="http://www.wwd.com/issue/article/111664">WWD</a>]				<a href="http://gawker.com/225009/media-bubble-all-the-critics-love-u-in-new-york" title="Click here to read more about Media Bubble: All The Critics Love U In New York">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/225009/media-bubble-all-the-critics-love-u-in-new-york]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-225009]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Prince]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[etp]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fishbowlny]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Huffpo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Jossip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Radar]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wwd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 29 Dec 2006 08:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emily Gould]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=225009&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Media Bubble: The Devil Is Actually Kind of Lame and Boring]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Media Bubble: The Devil Is Actually Kind of Lame and Boring" href="http://gawker.com/media-bubble/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">mediabubble</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Media Bubble: The Devil Is Actually Kind of Lame and Boring" href="http://gawker.com/224735/media-bubble-the-devil-is-actually-kind-of-lame-and-boring" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Media Bubble: The Devil Is Actually Kind of Lame and Boring" alt="Click here to read Media Bubble: The Devil Is Actually Kind of Lame and Boring" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2006/12/small_coles.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<li>Fashion magazine editor in chief documentary fever has risen to such a pitch that there are even cameras following around <em>Marie Claire's</em> Joanna Coles.  Where will it end, <em>Life& Style</em>?? [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/28/fashion/28ROW.html?_r=1&ref=media&oref=slogin">NYT</a>]				<a href="http://gawker.com/224735/media-bubble-the-devil-is-actually-kind-of-lame-and-boring" title="Click here to read more about Media Bubble: The Devil Is Actually Kind of Lame and Boring">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/224735/media-bubble-the-devil-is-actually-kind-of-lame-and-boring]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-224735]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Media Bubble]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Bonnie Fuller]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fishbowlny]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Huffington Post]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[joanna coles]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Jossip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Marie Claire]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[poynter]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tristram shandy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wwd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 28 Dec 2006 08:50:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emily Gould]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=224735&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New Shiloh Pix To Help Cambodia, Uh, Somehow]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read New Shiloh Pix To Help Cambodia, Uh, Somehow" href="http://gawker.com/wwd/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">wwd</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read New Shiloh Pix To Help Cambodia, Uh, Somehow" href="http://gawker.com/221769/new-shiloh-pix-to-help-cambodia-uh-somehow" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read New Shiloh Pix To Help Cambodia, Uh, Somehow" alt="Click here to read New Shiloh Pix To Help Cambodia, Uh, Somehow" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2006/12/small_shiloh_family.JPG"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				The contested 'exclusivity' of the new shots of Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie's "natural-born" offspring (way to give Z and Mad even more issues, <em>Daily News</em>!) doesn't really interest us that much, but in case it interests you, here you have it:  <em>Hello!</em> (a UK publication, natch) claimed that it had a World Exclusive, when in fact it only had US rights.  <em>People</em> actually has US rights, which is why their ed in chief, Larry Hackett, was holding up the photos on the Today show yesterday.  Neither publication <em>really</em> wanted the shots leaked all over the internet, but whatcha gonna do.  				<a href="http://gawker.com/221769/new-shiloh-pix-to-help-cambodia-uh-somehow" title="Click here to read more about New Shiloh Pix To Help Cambodia, Uh, Somehow">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/221769/new-shiloh-pix-to-help-cambodia-uh-somehow]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-221769]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Wwd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Angelina Jolie]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Brad PItt]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Hello!]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Shiloh]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 14 Dec 2006 08:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emily Gould]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=221769&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Today in Obvious: Fabian Basabe is a Liar]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Today in Obvious: Fabian Basabe is a Liar" href="http://gawker.com/fabian-basabe/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">fabianbasabe</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Today in Obvious: Fabian Basabe is a Liar" href="http://gawker.com/220403/today-in-obvious-fabian-basabe-is-a-liar" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Today in Obvious: Fabian Basabe is a Liar" alt="Click here to read Today in Obvious: Fabian Basabe is a Liar" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2006/12/small_fabianboys.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				More fun at the expense of washed-up former 'It Boy' Fabian Basabe:  today, <em>WWD</em> takes a closer look at the website for Fabian's charitable organization, which has the remarkably ambitious (and remarkably vague) goal of "promot[ing] universal cooperation, and advanc[ing] human achievement through support programs in such areas as medicine, education, research and service."  That sentence rings a little bit false, sure, but not as false as this sentence in Basabe's bio: <blockquote>"Fabian, who once was named one of Gotham's most eligible bachelors, is now happily married and focused on his charity work and television career while still contributing as a celebrity features editor to <em>Glamour</em> and <em>Gotham</em> magazine."</blockquote> Hmmm, really?  A celebrity features editor at two major magazines?  How does he find the time, in between bouts of posing for pictures with musclebound men and getting all philanthropic?  The fishiness of this assertion was confirmed by a Glamour spokeswoman, who told <em>WWD</em>, "A celebrity features editor? No, he is not a celebrity features editor. He wrote one story."   				<a href="http://gawker.com/220403/today-in-obvious-fabian-basabe-is-a-liar" title="Click here to read more about Today in Obvious: Fabian Basabe is a Liar">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/220403/today-in-obvious-fabian-basabe-is-a-liar]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-220403]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Fabian Basabe]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Lies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wwd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 08 Dec 2006 11:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emily Gould]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=220403&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Fabian Basabe's Low-Born Origins Revealed]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Fabian Basabe's Low-Born Origins Revealed" href="http://gawker.com/fabian-basabe/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">fabianbasabe</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Fabian Basabe's Low-Born Origins Revealed" href="http://gawker.com/220051/fabian-basabes-low+born-origins-revealed" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Fabian Basabe's Low-Born Origins Revealed" alt="Click here to read Fabian Basabe's Low-Born Origins Revealed" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2006/12/small_fabian.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				 In WWD's Memo Pad today, we found out for sure where old-news closeted homo/socialtard Fabian came from, which had been a source of rampant speculation for people with waaaaay too much time on their hands: <blockquote>In the past, Basabe has said his father is a telephone mogul from Ecuador. The reality is, his father (also named Fabian) is a Bal Harbour, Fla., hotel owner with two failed restaurants who's been in and out of court in Florida for his apparent inability to pay bills on time . . . In 2001, Basabe Sr. filed for bankruptcy, which his son later said was part of the family's "business strategy."  The business strategy must have been tough to implement; Basabe Sr. was still facing new lawsuits in 2004. </blockquote> Hey there, Socialite Rankles: you can stop knocking yourselves out flipping through the <a href="http://www.socialiterank.com/?p=672">Ecuadorian Social Book.</a> But please, don't stop making bigoted cracks about how "you need to earn at least $20 an hour" to be registered in it &mdash; that kind of thing is why we looove you.				<a href="http://gawker.com/220051/fabian-basabes-low+born-origins-revealed" title="Click here to read more about Fabian Basabe's Low-Born Origins Revealed">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/220051/fabian-basabes-low+born-origins-revealed]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-220051]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Fabian Basabe]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[socialite rank]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wwd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 07 Dec 2006 11:50:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emily Gould]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=220051&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA['WWD': Don't Believe the Hype]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read 'WWD': Don't Believe the Hype" href="http://gawker.com/wwd/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">wwd</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read 'WWD': Don't Believe the Hype" href="http://gawker.com/208402/wwd-dont-believe-the-hype" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read 'WWD': Don't Believe the Hype" alt="Click here to read 'WWD': Don't Believe the Hype" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2006/10/small_SP32-20061018-092927.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Some interesting news from today's <i>WWD</i>:				<a href="http://gawker.com/208402/wwd-dont-believe-the-hype" title="Click here to read more about 'WWD': Don't Believe the Hype">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/208402/wwd-dont-believe-the-hype]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-208402]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Wwd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vogue living]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Oct 2006 10:40:27 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[abalk2]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=208402&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Remainders: Steve Jobs Will Devour This Town]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Remainders: Steve Jobs Will Devour This Town" href="http://gawker.com/apple/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">apple</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Remainders: Steve Jobs Will Devour This Town" href="http://gawker.com/186922/remainders-steve-jobs-will-devour-this-town" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Remainders: Steve Jobs Will Devour This Town" alt="Click here to read Remainders: Steve Jobs Will Devour This Town" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2006/07/small_applecube.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				&#8226; <i>Another</i> Apple Store in Manhattan? Are you fucking kidding us? [<a href="http://www.curbed.com/archives/2006/07/12/apple_ousts_nine_west_in_west_34th_showdown.php">Curbed</a>]				<a href="http://gawker.com/186922/remainders-steve-jobs-will-devour-this-town" title="Click here to read more about Remainders: Steve Jobs Will Devour This Town">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/186922/remainders-steve-jobs-will-devour-this-town]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-186922]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Ann Coulter]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Conde Nast]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fairchild]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Johnny Weir]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Spin]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wwd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 12 Jul 2006 19:20:54 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jessica]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=186922&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Si Won't Air-Condition Fairchild Stepkids?]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
									</div>
				This showed up in the inbox last night, and, while we can't quite believe it's true, we're also a touch intrigued:				<a href="http://gawker.com/178001/si-wont-air+condition-fairchild-stepkids" title="Click here to read more about Si Won't Air-Condition Fairchild Stepkids?">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/178001/si-wont-air+condition-fairchild-stepkids]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-178001]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Conde Nast]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fairchild Publications]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Summer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wwd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 02 Jun 2006 12:55:23 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=178001&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Peter Braunstein Legitimately a Sick Fuck]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Peter Braunstein Legitimately a Sick Fuck" href="http://gawker.com/peter-braunstein/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">peterbraunstein</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Peter Braunstein Legitimately a Sick Fuck" href="http://gawker.com/177930/peter-braunstein-legitimately-a-sick-fuck" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Peter Braunstein Legitimately a Sick Fuck" alt="Click here to read Peter Braunstein Legitimately a Sick Fuck" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2006/06/small_scarypeter.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				In today's most excruciatingly obvious news, a scan of former <i>WWD</i> staffer Peter Braunstein's brain has revealed that &mdash; surprise! &mdash; he's mental. Images reveal that Braunstein has frontal lobe deficiencies consistent with schizophrenia, which should help his legal team bolster his insanity defense. So sayeth the expert:				<a href="http://gawker.com/177930/peter-braunstein-legitimately-a-sick-fuck" title="Click here to read more about Peter Braunstein Legitimately a Sick Fuck">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/177930/peter-braunstein-legitimately-a-sick-fuck]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-177930]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Peter Braunstein]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Metro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wwd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 02 Jun 2006 10:06:42 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jessica]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=177930&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[How to Unleash Your Inner Bonnie]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read How to Unleash Your Inner Bonnie" href="http://gawker.com/bonnie-fuller/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">bonniefuller</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read How to Unleash Your Inner Bonnie" href="http://gawker.com/144720/how-to-unleash-your-inner-bonnie" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read How to Unleash Your Inner Bonnie" alt="Click here to read How to Unleash Your Inner Bonnie" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2005/12/20051222bonnie.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Bonnie Fuller's advice tome, (deep breath) <I>The Joys of Much Too Much: Go for the Big Life &mdash; The Great Career, The Perfect Guy, and Everything Else You've Ever Wanted (Even If You're Afraid You Don't Have What It Takes)</I>, is headed to a bookstore near you this spring, and in today's <I>WWD</I> Jeff Bercovici takes a first look.				<a href="http://gawker.com/144720/how-to-unleash-your-inner-bonnie" title="Click here to read more about How to Unleash Your Inner Bonnie">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/144720/how-to-unleash-your-inner-bonnie]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-144720]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Bonnie Fuller]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wwd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:22:19 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=144720&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Breaking: Peter Braunstein Arrested]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
									</div>
				The details are scarce, but at least it's official: Tennessee authorities have arrested former <i>Women's Wear Daily</i> reporter and sexual assault suspect Peter Braunstein. About fucking time. 				<a href="http://gawker.com/143728/breaking-peter-braunstein-arrested" title="Click here to read more about Breaking: Peter Braunstein Arrested">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/143728/breaking-peter-braunstein-arrested]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-143728]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Peter Braunstein]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Metro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Village Voice]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[W]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wwd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 16 Dec 2005 17:02:13 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jessica]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=143728&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Braunstein's Victim Calls Media-Fightin' Lawyer]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
									</div>
				While former <i>Women's Wear Daily</i> reporter and "allegedly suspected" sexual predator Peter Braunstein is believed to be traipsing about the wilds of the upper midwest, his victim has been doing her best to go on with her life. The woman, a former <i>W</i> employee who Braunstein is believed to have molested for 12 hours on Halloween, has hired lawyer Lynda Goldman to "to encourage the media to behave in a responsible manner so that this victim isn
t victimized further." Ooooh &mdash; <i>a personal watchdog</i>. Totes smooth. Says Goldman:				<a href="http://gawker.com/141520/braunsteins-victim-calls-media+fightin-lawyer" title="Click here to read more about Braunstein's Victim Calls Media-Fightin' Lawyer">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/141520/braunsteins-victim-calls-media+fightin-lawyer]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-141520]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Peter Braunstein]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Metro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Village Voice]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[W]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wwd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 07 Dec 2005 10:29:25 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jessica]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=141520&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Peter Braunstein on a Mission From God]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
									</div>
				More details are emerging about former <i>Women's Wear Daily</i> reporter Peter Braunstein's quality time spent in Ohio, where he allegedly fled after being suspected of sexually assaulting a former co-worker. Apparently Braunstein, while posing as a Hollywood location scout, had dinner on November 7 with a Cleveland bar owner:				<a href="http://gawker.com/141229/peter-braunstein-on-a-mission-from-god" title="Click here to read more about Peter Braunstein on a Mission From God">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/141229/peter-braunstein-on-a-mission-from-god]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-141229]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Peter Braunstein]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Metro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Village Voice]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[W]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wwd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 06 Dec 2005 10:02:50 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jessica]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=141229&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Peter Braunstein Emerges in Land of Cleves]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
									</div>
				Finally some news this weekend on former <i>Women's Wear Daily</i> reporter Peter Braunstein, who's been on the run since allegedly sexually assaulting a former co-worker on Halloween. According the several eyewitness accounts, Braunstein fled to Cleveland a few days after the incident, where he posed as a location scout of <i>Nip/Tuck</i> and told others he was a retired Los Angeles cop. Under the aliases Peter Bronson, Peter Brown, and Peter Grant, P-Bra's Cleveland adventure included stays at cheap hotels, smoking pot, blowing rails, and hitting the strip clubs. So unfair how the bad guys have all the fun.				<a href="http://gawker.com/140922/peter-braunstein-emerges-in-land-of-cleves" title="Click here to read more about Peter Braunstein Emerges in Land of Cleves">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/140922/peter-braunstein-emerges-in-land-of-cleves]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-140922]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Peter Braunstein]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Metro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Village Voice]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[W]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wwd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 05 Dec 2005 09:33:58 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jessica]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=140922&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Craigslist Predictions for Peter Braunstein's Doppel-Poster]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
									</div>
				After<a href="http://gawker.com/news/peter-braunstein/craigslist-predictions-for-peter-braunstein-138578.php"> three</a> <a href="http://gawker.com/news/peter-braunstein/craigslist-predictions-for-peter-braunstein-part-ii-139303.php">annoyingly</a> <a href="http://gawker.com/news/peter-braunstein/craigslist-predictions-for-peter-braunstein-part-iii-139945.php">creepy</a> Craigslist postings on the whereabouts of sexual assault suspect and former <i>Women's Wear Daily</i> reporter Peter Braunstein (the author of which made a shadowy appearance on Fox News), we find the following to be nothing short of fantastic:				<a href="http://gawker.com/140425/craigslist-predictions-for-peter-braunsteins-doppel+poster" title="Click here to read more about Craigslist Predictions for Peter Braunstein's Doppel-Poster">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/140425/craigslist-predictions-for-peter-braunsteins-doppel+poster]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-140425]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Peter Braunstein]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Craigslist]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Metro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Village Voice]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[W]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wwd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 01 Dec 2005 12:04:15 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jessica]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=140425&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Craigslist Predictions for Peter Braunstein, Part III]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Craigslist Predictions for Peter Braunstein, Part III" href="http://gawker.com/peter-braunstein/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">peterbraunstein</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Craigslist Predictions for Peter Braunstein, Part III" href="http://gawker.com/139945/craigslist-predictions-for-peter-braunstein-part-iii" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Craigslist Predictions for Peter Braunstein, Part III" alt="Click here to read Craigslist Predictions for Peter Braunstein, Part III" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2005/11/braunsteinnew.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Another day, and yet another Craigslist post ruminating on the state of suspected fake fireman and former <i>Women's Wear Daily</i> staffer Peter Braunstein, who has inexplicably been on the loose since Halloween. As before, the author of this item seems suspiciously insightful and inanely detailed &mdash; so much so that, of course, we have to wonder if the writer might be uncomfortably close to Braunstein himself. To add to the shudder factor, the author has been emailing Gawker to alert us to his or her new works, presumably so that we draw attention to the screeds by posting them.				<a href="http://gawker.com/139945/craigslist-predictions-for-peter-braunstein-part-iii" title="Click here to read more about Craigslist Predictions for Peter Braunstein, Part III">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/139945/craigslist-predictions-for-peter-braunstein-part-iii]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-139945]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Peter Braunstein]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Craigslist]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Metro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Village Voice]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[W]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wwd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 29 Nov 2005 14:36:53 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jessica]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=139945&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Peter Braunstien, 'New York' Cover Boy]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Peter Braunstien, 'New York' Cover Boy" href="http://gawker.com/peter-braunstein/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">peterbraunstein</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Peter Braunstien, 'New York' Cover Boy" href="http://gawker.com/139541/peter-braunstien-new-york-cover-boy" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Peter Braunstien, 'New York' Cover Boy" alt="Click here to read Peter Braunstien, 'New York' Cover Boy" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2005/11/firefiend.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				It was only a matter of time before <i>New York's</i> resident axe-lady Vanessa Grigoriadis (who, we might add, <a href="http://gawker.com/news/nicole-richie/gawker-poll-results-the-truth-about-nicole-richies-diamonds-138755.php">did not ghostwrite</a> Nicole Richie's book) got on the Peter Braunstein bus &mdash; and when she did, by God, she took the wheel and drove that bus straight to Cape fucking Fear. The cover story reveals the disturbing extent to which the alleged fireman/molester and former <i>Women's Wear Daily</i> writer harbored his obsessions but, ultimately, doesn't tell us anything we didn't already know. Dude's a sick puppy &mdash; here's a gazillion words on the matter.				<a href="http://gawker.com/139541/peter-braunstien-new-york-cover-boy" title="Click here to read more about Peter Braunstien, 'New York' Cover Boy">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/139541/peter-braunstien-new-york-cover-boy]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-139541]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Peter Braunstein]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Metro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[New York Magazine]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Village Voice]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[W]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wwd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 28 Nov 2005 08:46:12 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jessica]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=139541&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

