<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Blender Calls Gawker "Accurate" -- and it's not even Opposite Day! - Gawker Comments]]></title>
		
	    	<lastBuildDate><![CDATA[Thu, 13 Oct 2005 21:34:01 EDT]]></lastBuildDate>
	    	<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 13 Oct 2005 21:34:01 EDT]]></pubDate>
		<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/news/gawker-stalker/blender-calls-gawker-accurate-++-and-its-not-even-opposite-day-130905.php]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Blender Calls Gawker "Accurate" -- and it's not even Opposite Day!]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/news/gawker-stalker/blender-calls-gawker-accurate-++-and-its-not-even-opposite-day-130905.php#c4990]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[Gawker accurate?? Another reason not to read blender. 

More reasons? Why is a music magazine profiling Natalie Portman??? <p>higgins</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[higgins]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[7:130905:c4990]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 13 Oct 2005 21:34:01 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>