just like my broadcast classes at the j-school back in the day. long boring shots of the subway station, crappy editing and jump shots, self obsessed discussions on the steps, and a healthy dose of sexual tension.

when i watched the intro i kept thinking -- hey, that's my footage. then i realized *everyone* with a video camera who went to columbia shot the same stuff.

if only i was still a student.

bkkbaby

I'm personally glad that creative yet untalented undergrads have access to something like this. In my day, they did "public art" and in Winnipeg, that meant mimes.

Wrap your brains around that: Winnipeg mimes.

raincoaster

So glad CTV didn't exist in my day.

I guess there really aren't better things for the liberal arts majors to do than hang out on the steps and make fun of engineering students for being so busy.

kjc9

Hey...part one starts out pretty good and thenzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

lefty

Thank you all, now I do not have to subject myself to an actual viewing. That's 10 minutes of my left that I can actually keep.

VoicefromAfar

why did i just watch that? something is very, very wrong with me.

and, um, gospel music for the opening? yeah, makes sense, there were a lot of black folks in the cast....

Lolagyrl

I want to poke my own eyes out. Like St. Lucy or something. Man, I've seen better movies come out of my 6 year old's summer camp.

who_does_she_hope_to_be

It's nice to see that Ivy league schools can create the same unwatchable junk that city and community college schools can.

Oh, and the first 40 seconds of intro--which is the intro--is some of the worst video editing I have seen in years. Kudos, Columbia!

SpyMagician

WHEREAS: Douchebag feels scathing and a bit retro but cool, and Fucktard seems badass and slightly silly, twatwaffle just lacks that certain je ne sais quoi.

It just seems . . . douchebaggish.

HipsterPit

God, that was painful. Even the promise of amateur lesbian porn couldn't get me farther than 1:37 into Part 2.

Clarence Rosario