<![CDATA[Media Bubble: YOU Will Probably Not Be Cond Nast's Publisher of the Year - Gawker Comments]]> <![CDATA[Media Bubble: YOU Will Probably Not Be Cond Nast's Publisher of the Year - Gawker Comments]]> <![CDATA[Media Bubble: YOU Will Probably Not Be Cond Nast's Publisher of the Year]]> So, is Conrad a Gawker commenter? There's nobody I can think of as long-winded as him except the Earl Grey, and that would be far too hilarious.

raincoaster

]]> <![CDATA[Media Bubble: YOU Will Probably Not Be Cond Nast's Publisher of the Year]]> You can already tell that Time is looking to cut costs from the favicon they're now using, which was apparently designed in 1997 on MS Paint. And yes, I know it takes a huge loser to take note of Time's favicon at 9:45 in the morning, but c'mon, this shit is hideous.

If you're going to host a famous gay as your lead blogger, you have to think fashion-friendly, people.

Gawker's "slightly used maxi pad" look, on the other hand, is quite fetching.

t.a.m.s.y.

]]>