<![CDATA[Amanda Congdon Would Like to Mutter At You - Gawker Comments]]> <![CDATA[Amanda Congdon Would Like to Mutter At You - Gawker Comments]]> <![CDATA[Amanda Congdon Would Like to Mutter At You]]> @IndianSlipper: You lie. It totally was. Check the side view and I promise you will see my way.

kctomorrow

]]> <![CDATA[Amanda Congdon Would Like to Mutter At You]]> pop17 is better. *yawn*

justinleon

]]> <![CDATA[Amanda Congdon Would Like to Mutter At You]]> Poor Amanda! She's unintentionally painful to watch sometimes, but she's clearly not motivated by promoting herself alone. She does have more to offer, although she, and everyone else, seem to be a bit muddled about what exactly that may be. So, in the meantime, offer boobies! Can't complain about that!

But Amanda hasn't sunk so low (yet) to be sent to that special place of scorn rightfully occupied by that "Star-editor-at-large" idiot, a creature of not even the slightest accomplishments or abilities(except shilling herself), who, like her painfully illiterate poser friends, personifies empty famewhoreism.

Let's let them continue to occupy that special place they richly deserve.

grrad

]]> <![CDATA[Amanda Congdon Would Like to Mutter At You]]> Barf. It's called an L-cut, Amanda. Look into it.

ByTheWhiskersOfKurviTasch

]]> <![CDATA[Amanda Congdon Would Like to Mutter At You]]> Her brother is channeling Tom Cruise in 'Risky Business', which was made around when he was born.
What a tool!

Let's just introduce Amanda to Julia Allison.
They would destroy each other if they touched: Matter -anti-matter.
I'm not sure which one is which, however.

Greasy Thumb Guzik

]]> <![CDATA[Amanda Congdon Would Like to Mutter At You]]> This video needs more tasering. If she was tasered on screen every webisode (say by her bro for instance) I definitely think more people would watch.

cockfightbarmitzvah

]]> <![CDATA[Amanda Congdon Would Like to Mutter At You]]> Sorry to be so clueless but somebody please tell me: is the acting deliberately awful? To be funny or something? Or is this really the best these people could do?

crotchety

]]> <![CDATA[Amanda Congdon Would Like to Mutter At You]]> David-Lynch-style dialogue (and acting)!

T-Gawk

]]> <![CDATA[Amanda Congdon Would Like to Mutter At You]]> Can't hate her. I am a huge boob fan.

belltolls

]]> <![CDATA[Amanda Congdon Would Like to Mutter At You]]> @Tippy and Bad Girl: ha. the news in esperanto. that could work for her

if_i_only_had_a_heart

]]> <![CDATA[Amanda Congdon Would Like to Mutter At You]]> It's like they ran the dialogue and pacing through Babelfish a few times.

Tippy and Bad Girl

]]> <![CDATA[Amanda Congdon Would Like to Mutter At You]]> nice porch, no doubt. on further review, looking a bit broad in the beam.

timeoutofmind

]]> <![CDATA[Amanda Congdon Would Like to Mutter At You]]> @kctomorrow: Damnit! I only clicked because you said "halter top", and it wasn't one.

I'll watch it if it's like naked news.

IndianSlipper

]]> <![CDATA[Amanda Congdon Would Like to Mutter At You]]> No sensy makey.
I adore that she felt the need to clarify "non sexual". It can be confusing for people to see a pretty girl with makeup on, a halter top oh and a DILDO without it being sexual. She must need to make that clarification normally considering she obviously only shops at erotic stores.

kctomorrow

]]> <![CDATA[Amanda Congdon Would Like to Mutter At You]]> edgy! cutting edge! NOT

wow. it's not even wrong

if_i_only_had_a_heart

]]> <![CDATA[Amanda Congdon Would Like to Mutter At You]]> I don't know ... I think it has something to do with Amanda having a big rack and a decent butt. Which means, of course, that I will be watching her, er, sometimes daily.

mordecai1908

]]> <![CDATA[Amanda Congdon Would Like to Mutter At You]]> @VirusWithShoes: Yeah, between the posts on the WSJ list of business visionaries, fluorocarbon food, and this, I've got to say that American's high quality standards seem to be slipping. On a greased glass slope at a 180ยบ angle, with the help of 300 mile an hour tailwinds.

SarahHeartburn

]]> <![CDATA[Amanda Congdon Would Like to Mutter At You]]> @VirusWithShoes: If only oil were more like shit.

Calitri

]]> <![CDATA[Amanda Congdon Would Like to Mutter At You]]> OMG! This is so shit! And is the shitty pictures and shit things happening also coupled with special judder-audio courtesy of shitty Vimeo also happening for anyone else? I made it to 0.37 and had to stop it. Mostly because of all the shit contained in that tiny little shit-box. Shit!

Just when you thought that the world had reached peak-shit, someone discovers a rich, new seam.

VirusWithShoes

]]> <![CDATA[Amanda Congdon Would Like to Mutter At You]]> PS, I would still pound her into next week. For reals.

Buzz Killington

]]> <![CDATA[Amanda Congdon Would Like to Mutter At You]]> Ok, I watched the video, and I still don't undertand why young Jan Levinson has a video blog.

ExecutiveIntern

]]> <![CDATA[Amanda Congdon Would Like to Mutter At You]]> Is she still shilling for DuPont or whatever chemical company that was, in which she didn't see as a conflict of interest because she was a 'new' kind of journalist, who wasn't constrained by such archaic paradigms?

I guess that didn't really work out for her.

Buzz Killington

]]> <![CDATA[Amanda Congdon Would Like to Mutter At You]]> I think she really tears down the fourth wall, destroying preconceived notions of audience/performer I/thou dichotomies in a great maelstrom of swaying cans.

BadUncle

]]> <![CDATA[Amanda Congdon Would Like to Mutter At You]]> I won't watch, on my terms.

shadowy figure

]]> <![CDATA[Amanda Congdon Would Like to Mutter At You]]> Myspace? Friendster?

Soooo edgy!

Steven Gerrard's Gifted Right Foot

]]> <![CDATA[Amanda Congdon Would Like to Mutter At You]]> Shakem for me, Amanda.

TheHonJudgeSmails

]]>