<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[How Magazine Editors Look After Their Own - Gawker Comments]]></title>
		
	    	<lastBuildDate><![CDATA[Sat, 22 Mar 2008 06:30:59 EDT]]></lastBuildDate>
	    	<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 22 Mar 2008 06:30:59 EDT]]></pubDate>
		<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5004321/how-magazine-editors-look-after-their-own]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[How Magazine Editors Look After Their Own]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5004321/how-magazine-editors-look-after-their-own#c4823089]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>I get the cover art. He's imploding and now we're all supposed to believe it. Except he isn't. At all.</p> <p>munkles</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[munkles]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[7:5004321:c4823089]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 22 Mar 2008 06:30:59 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[How Magazine Editors Look After Their Own]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5004321/how-magazine-editors-look-after-their-own#c4822820]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Every time I pick Esquire up (like, at the doctor's office) I'm surprised at just how good it is, IN PARTS. There's a whole lot of crap in there, too, but it is one magazine that aspires to Smart, not Intellectual, not Snarky, not Flash. Smart. We do need more of that.</p> <p><a href="http://raincoaster.com">raincoaster</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[raincoaster]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[7:5004321:c4822820]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 22 Mar 2008 03:22:51 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[How Magazine Editors Look After Their Own]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5004321/how-magazine-editors-look-after-their-own#c4821119]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Pretty obvious Esquire isn't going to win this one. Too bad. It's a hell of a lot better magazine than some of the others nominated. Men's Health? Popular Mechanics? Gimme a break. And the New York Times Magazine? It is the single most boring and pretentious "magazine" in the solar system.</p> <p>SecureLocation</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[SecureLocation]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[7:5004321:c4821119]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 21 Mar 2008 22:41:55 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[How Magazine Editors Look After Their Own]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5004321/how-magazine-editors-look-after-their-own#c4821025]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4819587">cassandra</a>: If they win we all lose.</p> <p>dankfu</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[dankfu]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[7:5004321:c4821025]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 21 Mar 2008 22:34:25 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[How Magazine Editors Look After Their Own]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5004321/how-magazine-editors-look-after-their-own#c4819587]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>This is only a problem if Esquire wins.</P> <p>cassandra</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[cassandra]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[7:5004321:c4819587]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 21 Mar 2008 20:10:35 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[How Magazine Editors Look After Their Own]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5004321/how-magazine-editors-look-after-their-own#c4818242]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4815949">Cheap Shot</a>: I hear you, but I still try to avoid saying it at all cost. I had IV and was enjoying it until I left it in the seat back on a flight. It was perfect for a short subway commute.</p>
<p>@<a href="#c4816075">Juancho</a>: Yeah that was so dull. He's in a funk. Maybe he needs to go back out on the road with a shitty cover band to recover some edge.</p>
<p>@<a href="#c4816102">Go Like Hell Machine</a>: I tend to skip the features in most issues, but the Clooney one was actually pretty good. The guy treats the interview like I would - simply discussing all the rumors surrounding him. He's got great perspective still, and a good sense of humor.</p> <p><a href="n/a">fiveinchtaint</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[fiveinchtaint]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[7:5004321:c4818242]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 21 Mar 2008 18:32:28 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[How Magazine Editors Look After Their Own]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5004321/how-magazine-editors-look-after-their-own#c4816102]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4815239">fiveinchtaint</a>: He's still pretty good, and they've had a couple other good articles in the last 5 or 6 issues (I'm thinking in particular of the one about <i>To Catch A Predator</i>).  But they could use some energy.</p> <p><a href="http://golikehellmachine.tumblr.com/">Go Like Hell Machine</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Go Like Hell Machine]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[7:5004321:c4816102]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:50:24 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[How Magazine Editors Look After Their Own]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5004321/how-magazine-editors-look-after-their-own#c4816075]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P><I>Esquire</I> doesn't have the same punch it had even a year ago, but for features and general reporting, they're still head and shoulders above <I>GQ</I>.</P>
<P>@<A href="http://gawker.com/5004321/how-magazine-editors-look-after-their-own#c4815043">BullfightsOnAcid</A>: They're over as of this year, anyway.</P>
<P>@<A href="http://gawker.com/5004321/how-magazine-editors-look-after-their-own#c4815239">fiveinchtaint</A>: Tell me about it, I thought April Fool's had come early with him covering <I>The McLaughlin Report</I> last month.</P> <p><a href="http://braincloudpictures.blogspot.com">Juancho</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Juancho]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[7:5004321:c4816075]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:49:39 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[How Magazine Editors Look After Their Own]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5004321/how-magazine-editors-look-after-their-own#c4815949]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4815239">fiveinchtaint</a>: Don't be ashamed to say 'snark'. I feel like Gawker get's the credit for literally inventing it anyhow so why be ashamed?<br>
As for Klosterman, I enjoyed his latest book 'IV', which basically included alot of his Esquire pieces. I think of him more as a philosopher if anything and if he's lacking in humor maybe he isn't getting laid?</p> <p>Cheap Shot</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cheap Shot]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[7:5004321:c4815949]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:45:10 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[How Magazine Editors Look After Their Own]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5004321/how-magazine-editors-look-after-their-own#c4815239]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>I know there are a lot of folks here who are over Klosterman, but I still look forward to his pieces each month. This month's is a bit serious and doesn't have the usual sarcasm (including footnotes), which seems to be a trend - decreasing humor. Is he getting crotchety? Is he becoming the Emily Gould of Esquire? Can't stomach the (fuck I hate to say it) snark anymore?</p> <p><a href="n/a">fiveinchtaint</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[fiveinchtaint]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[7:5004321:c4815239]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:18:58 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[How Magazine Editors Look After Their Own]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5004321/how-magazine-editors-look-after-their-own#c4815190]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4814982">MyCubeHas3Sides</a>: I don't think the omnipresent enter OR exit.</p> <p><a href="http://inothernews.tumblr.com">In Other News...</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[In Other News...]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[7:5004321:c4815190]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:17:16 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[How Magazine Editors Look After Their Own]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5004321/how-magazine-editors-look-after-their-own#c4815166]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Oooh, now fill the room with smoke and you have intrigue!</p> <p><a href="http://inothernews.tumblr.com">In Other News...</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[In Other News...]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[7:5004321:c4815166]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:16:38 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[How Magazine Editors Look After Their Own]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5004321/how-magazine-editors-look-after-their-own#c4815146]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>The nomination is a reported fiction. In fact, they received no nods and currently have an associate editor from WWE Magazine crafting their own "award."</p> <p><a href="http://editorialiste.blogspot.com/">mitchel_stevens</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[mitchel_stevens]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[7:5004321:c4815146]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:15:40 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[How Magazine Editors Look After Their Own]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5004321/how-magazine-editors-look-after-their-own#c4815043]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>The only thing I looked forward to from Esquire was the annual Dubious Achievement Awards. But then Cracked.com came along and now does the same thing daily.</p> <p>BullfightsOnAcid</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[BullfightsOnAcid]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[7:5004321:c4815043]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:11:32 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[How Magazine Editors Look After Their Own]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5004321/how-magazine-editors-look-after-their-own#c4814982]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>"Enterted" = Enter Tedsez?</p> <p><a href="http://www.mycubehasthreesides.blogspot.com">MyCubeHas3Sides</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[MyCubeHas3Sides]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[7:5004321:c4814982]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:09:03 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>